Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Lacuna Research MCP

PYPI · LACUNA-RESEARCH-MCP · 2 COMPONENTS

Search Lacuna's ML research graph for papers, directions, authors, venues, and hypotheses.

−2 this week 88 Trust /100

Last scanned (12 hours ago)

Scores higher than 90% of PyPI servers

Category Education and Research

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Runs setuptools.build_meta at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • 1 of 31 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency97
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to tiptreesystems/lacuna-research-mcp). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 1 days ago).Pass
  • Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability58
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2558 tokens (~196/item across 13 items; 13 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management90
  • Stability observed for 27 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 13 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 14 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (16)

  • Malware scan
  • Known CVEs
  • Install scripts
  • Dependency health
  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 6 Nov 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 5 Nov 26 −14
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 4 Nov 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 3 Nov 26 −14
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Package version: 0.6.7 → 0.6.8 functional
  • 2 Nov 26 −4
    • Stability: pass → 0.77 functional
  • 30 Oct 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 29 Oct 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 28 Oct 26 +2
    • Stability: fail → pass ▲ security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 6 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/lacuna-research-mcp@0.6.8

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem pypi
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo tiptreesystems/lacuna-research-mcp
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/tiptreesystems/lacuna-research-mcp/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/tags/v0.6.8
Rekor log index 3657458478
Predicate type PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1
Subject digest sha256:d3e01e166ae1e7e5fc052b9257c2f7e18a059f936ef751af1344c392a4e0a6d9

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend Known build tool setuptools.build_meta

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 31 packages
Packages resolved 31
No linked repository 1
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 13 exposed · ~2,319 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_author_context ~222

Fetch agent-oriented context for a Lacuna author. Author profiles describe research output (papers, directions, impact). A free-text `affiliation` field may be present but can be incomplete or outdated and may not represent current employment; the corpus has no biography or employment history, so do not infer those from this data. view selects the response shape: - "context" (default, recommended): Lacuna's compact author context — capped readable papers and an `impact_directions` list (named research directions) in place of the raw numeric `impact_clusters` telemetry, with the duplicated nested author record dropped server-side. - "full": the bounded full-shape author context (raw `impact_clusters`, nested author record; server collections are capped at 100). Set include_neighbors=True to include similar authors as named, linkable records. Neighbor computation may add significant server latency.

NameTypeReqDescription
author_id_or_urlstringyes–
include_neighborsboolean––
viewstring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_author_directions ~44

Fetch one page of an author's named research directions.

NameTypeReqDescription
author_id_or_urlstringyes–
limitinteger––
offsetinteger––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_author_neighbors ~46

Fetch one ranked page of neighboring/similar Lacuna authors.

NameTypeReqDescription
author_id_or_urlstringyes–
limitinteger––
offsetinteger––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_author_papers ~48

Fetch one page of an author's papers, ordered from newest to oldest.

NameTypeReqDescription
author_id_or_urlstringyes–
limitinteger––
offsetinteger––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_direction ~138

Fetch a Lacuna research direction/cluster. Use a numeric cluster ID (for example 25005) or a direction URL ending in that number. view selects the response shape (`context` typically contains the fields `full` provides plus the agent-oriented summary content): - "context" (default, recommended): compact agent-oriented summary with summary_markdown, capped papers/authors/related_directions, and truncation markers. - "full": raw upstream cluster record only. Cheaper than context when you only need basic cluster metadata.

NameTypeReqDescription
cluster_id_or_url–yes–
viewstring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_direction_papers ~145

Fetch paginated papers associated with a Lacuna research direction/cluster. view selects the per-paper shape: - "compact" (default, recommended): citation-ready rows (id, url, title, year, venue, a few authors, abstract snippet). Drops the raw upstream info blob and levels.cluster internals that otherwise dominate the payload. - "full": the complete upstream paper records. Much larger; use only when you need the raw metadata (openalex/dblp/arxiv ids, etc.).

NameTypeReqDescription
cluster_id_or_url–yes–
limitinteger––
pageinteger––
viewstring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_hypothesis ~146

Fetch a generated novel ML/AI research proposal from Lacuna. Use after search_lacuna(search_type="hypothesis") to inspect a proposal. view selects the response shape: - "context" (default, recommended): compact single-fetch proposal context — summary_markdown, abstract, and linked directions, with the raw upstream record (whose markdown duplicates summary_markdown) dropped server-side. - "full": the server's version record, including version history and signal counts. Proposal bodies are in versions[].markdown. Use only when you need versions or signals.

NameTypeReqDescription
hypothesis_id_or_urlstringyes–
viewstring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_institution_authors ~76

Fetch one page of authors affiliated with a Lacuna institution. Results are ordered by paper count. Use authors_total, authors_returned, authors_offset, and authors_truncated to page through the complete list.

NameTypeReqDescription
institution_key_or_urlstringyes–
limitinteger––
offsetinteger––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_institution_context ~111

Fetch agent-oriented context for a Lacuna institution. view selects the response shape: - "context" (default, recommended): compact institution context — capped top authors with the duplicated institution block dropped server-side. - "full": the complete institution context shape (duplicated institution record and a bounded author list with explicit truncation metadata). Use get_institution_authors to page through the complete author list.

NameTypeReqDescription
institution_key_or_urlstringyes–
viewstring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_paper ~340

Fetch a Lacuna paper by artifact id or paper URL. include_resources adds linked resources (code repositories, datasets, models, and demos) in context and full views by default. Pass False to omit them; other views ignore this option. Pass a resource entry's id to get_resource for further details. view selects the response shape. `context` requests Lacuna's compact agent-oriented context by default, while the four single-field views (blog/figures/concepts/neighbors) return isolated sub-resources: - "context" (default, recommended): agent-oriented summary with summary_markdown, authors, and a small figure preview. Start here for almost everything. Available versions are included when present; to read another version, use its artifact ID from the returned version list. - "full": raw upstream paper record. Cheaper than context when you only need basic metadata. - "preview": compact card with unique fields `excerpt`, `excerpt_kind`, `bookmarked`. Use for citation-style display. - "blog": just the summary_markdown content, without the rest of the context envelope. - "figures": just the figures list. - "concepts": just the concepts list. - "neighbors": just the related-papers list. figure_limit (context view only) caps the figure preview (server default 3). Pass 0 to suppress figure previews while keeping a `figures_truncated` signal.

NameTypeReqDescription
artifact_id_or_urlstringyes–
figure_limit–––
include_resourcesboolean––
viewstring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_resource ~156

Fetch a Lacuna research resource (code repository, dataset, model, or demo). Accepts a resource artifact ID (art_...) or a Lacuna resource URL containing that ID (/resource/<slug>/art_...). The response includes the external url, a summary, facets (tasks, modalities, size, license, access), provider metrics, a README/card excerpt, `publications` (linked papers with paper_id, title, venue, year, and relationship such as dataset_for or code_for), related research directions, and other resources mentioned by this one. Pass a publication's paper_id to get_paper to read the paper and its reported results.

NameTypeReqDescription
resource_id_or_urlstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_venue_context ~185

Fetch agent-oriented context for a Lacuna venue, optionally scoped to a year. Venue keys are opaque hashes (e.g. "d7bf22905bd6"), never human-readable names like "icml". Find the key first via search_lacuna(search_type="venue") or pass a /venue/... page URL. view selects the response shape: - "context" (default, recommended): compact venue context — capped top authors, non-placeholder top clusters, and a recent-activity slice (the requested `year` is always included), with the duplicated venue block and full year histogram dropped server-side. - "full": the complete venue context (full year histogram, all top authors/ clusters, duplicated venue record).

NameTypeReqDescription
venue_key_or_urlstringyes–
viewstring––
year–––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

search_lacuna ~662

Search Lacuna's ML/AI corpus for papers, research directions, authors, venues, institutions, novel research hypotheses, and research resources (code repositories, datasets, models, and demos linked to papers). For novel ML/AI research ideas, use search_type="hypothesis", then get_hypothesis on promising results. search_type accepts all, cluster, paper, author, institution, venue, hypothesis, or resource. Use paper for literature and get_paper to read a result. Use other sources for biographies, news, and non-research web content. Resources: search_type="resource" searches GitHub repositories, Hugging Face datasets/models, and Zenodo records that Lacuna has linked to at least one paper. To find benchmark or evaluation datasets, use search_type="resource" with resource_kind="dataset" (for example query "image classification benchmark" or a dataset name like "ImageNet"). resource_kind accepts codebase, dataset, model, or demo (one value or a list); provider accepts github, huggingface, or zenodo. Both filters require search_type "resource" or "all" (with either filter set, only resources are returned). Each result has an external `url`, a Lacuna `context_url`, and `linked_paper_count`; call get_resource on its id to list the linked papers (with their relationship to the resource), then get_paper on those papers for reported results and numbers. Resource search does not support date_from/date_to, venue, year sorting, or semantic ranking. ranking_profile accepts: - default / lexical (default): production ranking; relevance-sorted paper searches combine lexical and semantic retrieval when fields is unset. - semantic: conceptual paper retrieval; supported for paper and all. - bm25_title_abstract / bm25: lexical paper matching over those fields. sort accepts relevance (default), year_desc, or year_asc. Semantic ranking cannot use year sorting; constrain recency with date_from/date_to instead. date_from and date_to are inclusive YYYY, YYYY-MM, or YYYY-MM-DD bounds. a…

NameTypeReqDescription
author_id_or_url–––
date_from–––
date_to–––
fields–––
limitinteger––
offsetinteger––
provider–––
querystringyes–
ranking_profile–––
resource_kind–––
search_typestring––
sortstring––
venue–––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Lacuna Research MCP server?

Lacuna Research MCP runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx lacuna-research-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · lacuna-research-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add tiptreesystems-lacuna-research-mcp -- uvx lacuna-research-mcp
Common questions

What is the Lacuna Research MCP server?

Lacuna Research MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.tiptreesystems/lacuna-research-mcp. Search Lacuna's ML research graph for papers, directions, authors, venues, and hypotheses. This page covers its PyPI package (lacuna-research-mcp).

Is the Lacuna Research MCP server safe to use?

Lacuna Research MCP scores 88 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 6 November 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Lacuna Research MCP server expose?

Lacuna Research MCP exposes 13 tools: search_lacuna, get_hypothesis, get_direction, get_direction_papers, get_paper, and 8 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 2,319 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Lacuna Research MCP server still maintained?

Lacuna Research MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 6 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Lacuna Research MCP server under?

Lacuna Research MCP declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Lacuna Research MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 16 checks on Lacuna Research MCP, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 12 more. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to a PyPI package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.