Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Life Scenario

REMOTE · LIFESCENARIO.AI

For parents and teachers: SEL trait guides, practice scenarios, what-to-say guides (ages 6-14).

Available components

+1 this week 87 Trust /100

Last scanned (4 hours ago)

Scores higher than 94% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Education and Research

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security83
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 665 tokens (~166/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 31 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Oct 26 +1
    • Tool “get_what_to_say” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Server version: 1.2.2 → 1.3.0 functional
  • 17 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://lifescenario.ai/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=lifescenario.ai CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 8 Oct 2026 6 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 5714394239f98542ed3279a8c8fe4462d86
SANs: lifescenario.ai
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC secure

Validation of lifescenario.ai. — Secure

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
ai. present 1814, 3799 8, 8 Verified
lifescenario.ai. present 2371 13 Verified
lifescenario.ai. Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-eval' 'unsafe-inline' https://*.supabase.co https://va.vercel-scripts.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://analytics.ahrefs.com https://challenges.cloudflare.com https://r.wdfl.co; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; img-src 'self' data: https: blob:; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; connect-src 'self' https://*.supabase.co wss://*.supabase.co https://va.vercel-scripts.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://*.analytics.google.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://analytics.ahrefs.com https://api.getrewardful.com; media-src 'self' blob:; frame-src 'self' https://challenges.cloudflare.com; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; upgrade-insecure-requests;
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://lifescenario.ai/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://lifescenario.ai/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://lifescenario.ai/api/mcp
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~558 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
find_practice_situation ~243

Finds up to 3 public Life Scenario practice scenarios for a real-life situation a child is facing (for example: left out at recess, peer pressure, cheating in a group chat, parents arguing, a new school). Returns each scenario's title, a short excerpt, the ages it is written for, the traits it practises, a link the adult can open to try it together with the child without an account and, when one is published, the parent page or what-to-say guide about the same situation. match_quality is "close" (the scenarios are about this situation) or "loose" (they only touch it and may not fit). An empty or loose result means only that no public scenario fits. Returns authored practice scenarios only, never other children's answers. Topics involving risk of harm, or medical or legal questions, return status "not_covered" with no guide or practice link.

NameTypeReqDescription
ageinteger–Optional child age (6–14). Scenarios written for this age are ranked first.
situationstringyesThe situation in everyday words, e.g. "friends pressure him to laugh at another kid".
NameTypeReqDescription
how_it_worksstring––
match_qualitystring–close = the scenarios are about this situation; loose = they only touch it and may not fit. Absent when there are no matches.
matchesarrayyesUp to 3 practice scenarios; empty when no public scenario fits or the topic is not covered.
notestring––
statusstring–Present only when the topic is not covered: no guide or practice link is returned.
topic_areastring–With status not_covered: the kind of topic that was recognised.
urgent_helpstring–With status not_covered, for topics involving risk of harm: where to get urgent help, in the wording published in Life Scenario's guides.

No examples provided.

get_site_overview ~54

Factual overview of Life Scenario: what the SEL practice game for children aged 6–14 does, what it is not, how child safety is handled, what this server can and cannot see, and key links.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
about_this_serverstring––
companystring––
linksobject––
namestringyes–
safetystring––
traitsstring––
websitestringyes–
what_it_isstringyes–
what_it_is_notstring––

No examples provided.

get_what_to_say ~207

Finds the published Life Scenario page for parents that best matches a topic (for example: "nobody will play with me", "being teased", "a friend wants to copy my child's homework"): a "What to say" guide or a scenario page (one situation, with example replies by age), whichever is closer. Returns its short answer, the key lines a child can say, its URL and, when it has one, a practice_url: a practice scenario on a similar situation that the adult can open with the child without signing up. If no guide or scenario page on that topic is published, returns status "no_article_yet" and, when a public practice scenario is about the same situation, that scenario. Topics involving risk of harm, or medical or legal questions, return status "not_covered" with no guide or practice link.

NameTypeReqDescription
topicstringyesThe topic or the words the child used, e.g. "left out at recess".
NameTypeReqDescription
for_agesstring––
guides_hubstring–The list of all published what-to-say guides. Present with status no_article_yet.
how_it_worksstring––
key_scriptsarray–Lines a child can say, at most 8.
match_qualitystring–Present with a guide or scenario page, and with nearest_practice_situation.
more_atstring–The page, which has all of its lines. Present only when it has more than 8.
nearest_practice_situationobject–A public practice scenario about the same situation. Present only with status no_article_yet, and only when one fits closely.
notestring––
page_typestring–Present with an answer: a /what-to-say guide, or a /scenarios page about one situation (its short answer is the page's introduction and advice for parents, its key_scripts the page's example replies…
practice_notestring–What the practice link is, and the ages the scenario is written for when narrower than the guide's or page's.
practice_urlstring–A practice scenario on a similar situation; opens without an account. Present only when the guide or page has one.
reviewed_bystring–Name and credentials of the page's reviewer. Present only when the page has a named reviewer.
short_answerstring––
statusstring–Absent when a guide or scenario page is returned.
titlestring––
topic_areastring–With status not_covered: the kind of topic that was recognised.
updatedstring|null––
urgent_helpstring–Where to get urgent help: the wording of the guide's own section of that name, or, with status not_covered, the same published wording for topics involving risk of harm.
urlstring––

No examples provided.

list_traits ~54

Lists the 15 social and emotional learning (SEL) traits Life Scenario practises, each with a plain-language description and the everyday skills it covers. For questions about what a trait means for a child aged 6–14.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
traitsarrayyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Life Scenario MCP server?

Life Scenario is a hosted endpoint at https://lifescenario.ai/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · lifescenario.ai

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http ai-lifescenario-info 'https://lifescenario.ai/api/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Life Scenario MCP server?

Life Scenario is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as ai.lifescenario/info. For parents and teachers: SEL trait guides, practice scenarios, what-to-say guides (ages 6-14). This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://lifescenario.ai/api/mcp).

Is the Life Scenario MCP server safe to use?

Life Scenario scores 87 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Life Scenario MCP server expose?

Life Scenario exposes 4 tools: list_traits, find_practice_situation, get_what_to_say, get_site_overview. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 558 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Life Scenario MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Life Scenario without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Life Scenario MCP server still maintained?

Life Scenario is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.