Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Lacuna Research MCP

REMOTE · LACUNA.TIPTREESYSTEMS.COM · 2 COMPONENTS

Search Lacuna's ML research graph for papers, directions, authors, venues, and hypotheses.

+3 this week 76 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 hours ago)

Scores higher than 66% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Education and Research

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability56
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2820 tokens (~216/item across 13 items; 13 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management77
  • Stability observed for 23 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 13 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 14 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • Tool “get_institution_authors” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “get_institution_context” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Server version: 0.6.4 → 0.6.9 functional
  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://lacuna.tiptreesystems.com/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=tiptreesystems.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 5 Nov 2026 3 Feb 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 684d78fb40e62e13f81536dd9d268c
SANs: tiptreesystems.com, *.tiptreesystems.com, *.dev.tiptreesystems.com, dev.tiptreesystems.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of lacuna.tiptreesystems.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
tiptreesystems.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://lacuna.tiptreesystems.com/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://lacuna.tiptreesystems.com/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://lacuna.tiptreesystems.com/api/mcp
MCP tools · 13 exposed · ~2,581 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_author_context ~230

Fetch agent-oriented context for a Lacuna author. Author profiles describe research output (papers, directions, impact). A free-text `affiliation` field may be present but can be incomplete or outdated and may not represent current employment; the corpus has no biography or employment history, so do not infer those from this data. view selects the response shape: - "context" (default, recommended): Lacuna's compact author context — capped readable papers and an `impact_directions` list (named research directions) in place of the raw numeric `impact_clusters` telemetry, with the duplicated nested author record dropped server-side. - "full": the bounded full-shape author context (raw `impact_clusters`, nested author record; server collections are capped at 100). Set include_neighbors=True to include similar authors as named, linkable records. Neighbor computation may add significant server latency.

NameTypeReqDescription
author_id_or_urlstringyes–
include_neighborsboolean––
viewstring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_author_directions ~44

Fetch one page of an author's named research directions.

NameTypeReqDescription
author_id_or_urlstringyes–
limitinteger––
offsetinteger––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_author_neighbors ~46

Fetch one ranked page of neighboring/similar Lacuna authors.

NameTypeReqDescription
author_id_or_urlstringyes–
limitinteger––
offsetinteger––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_author_papers ~48

Fetch one page of an author's papers, ordered from newest to oldest.

NameTypeReqDescription
author_id_or_urlstringyes–
limitinteger––
offsetinteger––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_direction ~145

Fetch a Lacuna research direction/cluster. Use a numeric cluster ID (for example 25005) or a direction URL ending in that number. view selects the response shape (`context` typically contains the fields `full` provides plus the agent-oriented summary content): - "context" (default, recommended): compact agent-oriented summary with summary_markdown, capped papers/authors/related_directions, and truncation markers. - "full": raw upstream cluster record only. Cheaper than context when you only need basic cluster metadata.

NameTypeReqDescription
cluster_id_or_url–yes–
viewstring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_direction_papers ~149

Fetch paginated papers associated with a Lacuna research direction/cluster. view selects the per-paper shape: - "compact" (default, recommended): citation-ready rows (id, url, title, year, venue, a few authors, abstract snippet). Drops the raw upstream info blob and levels.cluster internals that otherwise dominate the payload. - "full": the complete upstream paper records. Much larger; use only when you need the raw metadata (openalex/dblp/arxiv ids, etc.).

NameTypeReqDescription
cluster_id_or_url–yes–
limitinteger––
pageinteger––
viewstring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_hypothesis ~151

Fetch a generated novel ML/AI research proposal from Lacuna. Use after search_lacuna(search_type="hypothesis") to inspect a proposal. view selects the response shape: - "context" (default, recommended): compact single-fetch proposal context — summary_markdown, abstract, and linked directions, with the raw upstream record (whose markdown duplicates summary_markdown) dropped server-side. - "full": the server's version record, including version history and signal counts. Proposal bodies are in versions[].markdown. Use only when you need versions or signals.

NameTypeReqDescription
hypothesis_id_or_urlstringyes–
viewstring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_institution_authors ~158

Fetch one page of authors who list a Lacuna institution on their papers. Each author appears because published papers list this institution as one of their affiliations. This is a record of research output, not a staff directory: it may be incomplete or out of date and does not show current employment. Each entry has the author's name, Lacuna page and paper count; there are no contact details or other personal data. Results are ordered by paper count. Use authors_total, authors_returned, authors_offset, and authors_truncated to page through the complete list.

NameTypeReqDescription
institution_key_or_urlstringyes–
limitinteger––
offsetinteger––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_institution_context ~192

Fetch agent-oriented context for a Lacuna institution (a university, lab or company). The context summarizes the institution's research output: its paper and author counts and the authors who publish most often under it. Affiliations come from the author affiliations listed on published papers, not from staff directories, and may be incomplete or out of date. The response has no contact details, biographies or employment records. view selects the response shape: - "context" (default, recommended): compact institution context — capped top authors with the duplicated institution block dropped server-side. - "full": the complete institution context shape (duplicated institution record and a bounded author list with explicit truncation metadata). Use get_institution_authors to page through the complete author list.

NameTypeReqDescription
institution_key_or_urlstringyes–
viewstring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_paper ~358

Fetch a Lacuna paper by artifact id or paper URL. include_resources adds linked resources (code repositories, datasets, models, and demos) in context and full views by default. Pass False to omit them; other views ignore this option. Pass a resource entry's id to get_resource for further details. view selects the response shape. `context` requests Lacuna's compact agent-oriented context by default, while the four single-field views (blog/figures/concepts/neighbors) return isolated sub-resources: - "context" (default, recommended): agent-oriented summary with summary_markdown, authors, and a small figure preview. Start here for almost everything. Available versions are included when present; to read another version, use its artifact ID from the returned version list. - "full": raw upstream paper record. Cheaper than context when you only need basic metadata. - "preview": compact card with unique fields `excerpt`, `excerpt_kind`, `bookmarked`. Use for citation-style display. - "blog": just the summary_markdown content, without the rest of the context envelope. - "figures": just the figures list. - "concepts": just the concepts list. - "neighbors": just the related-papers list. figure_limit (context view only) caps the figure preview (server default 3). Pass 0 to suppress figure previews while keeping a `figures_truncated` signal.

NameTypeReqDescription
artifact_id_or_urlstringyes–
figure_limit–––
include_resourcesboolean––
viewstring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_resource ~165

Fetch a Lacuna research resource (code repository, dataset, model, or demo). Accepts a resource artifact ID (art_...) or a Lacuna resource URL containing that ID (/resource/<slug>/art_...). The response includes the external url, a summary, facets (tasks, modalities, size, license, access), provider metrics, a README/card excerpt, `publications` (linked papers with paper_id, title, venue, year, and relationship such as dataset_for or code_for), related research directions, and other resources mentioned by this one. Pass a publication's paper_id to get_paper to read the paper and its reported results.

NameTypeReqDescription
resource_id_or_urlstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_venue_context ~192

Fetch agent-oriented context for a Lacuna venue, optionally scoped to a year. Venue keys are opaque hashes (e.g. "d7bf22905bd6"), never human-readable names like "icml". Find the key first via search_lacuna(search_type="venue") or pass a /venue/... page URL. view selects the response shape: - "context" (default, recommended): compact venue context — capped top authors, non-placeholder top clusters, and a recent-activity slice (the requested `year` is always included), with the duplicated venue block and full year histogram dropped server-side. - "full": the complete venue context (full year histogram, all top authors/ clusters, duplicated venue record).

NameTypeReqDescription
venue_key_or_urlstringyes–
viewstring––
year–––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

search_lacuna ~703

Search Lacuna's ML/AI corpus for papers, research directions, authors, venues, institutions, novel research hypotheses, and research resources (code repositories, datasets, models, and demos linked to papers). For novel ML/AI research ideas, use search_type="hypothesis", then get_hypothesis on promising results. search_type accepts all, cluster, paper, author, institution, venue, hypothesis, or resource. Use paper for literature and get_paper to read a result. Use other sources for biographies, news, and non-research web content. Resources: search_type="resource" searches GitHub repositories, Hugging Face datasets/models, and Zenodo records that Lacuna has linked to at least one paper. To find benchmark or evaluation datasets, use search_type="resource" with resource_kind="dataset" (for example query "image classification benchmark" or a dataset name like "ImageNet"). resource_kind accepts codebase, dataset, model, or demo (one value or a list); provider accepts github, huggingface, or zenodo. Both filters require search_type "resource" or "all" (with either filter set, only resources are returned). Each result has an external `url`, a Lacuna `context_url`, and `linked_paper_count`; call get_resource on its id to list the linked papers (with their relationship to the resource), then get_paper on those papers for reported results and numbers. Resource search does not support date_from/date_to, venue, year sorting, or semantic ranking. ranking_profile accepts: - default / lexical (default): production ranking; relevance-sorted paper searches combine lexical and semantic retrieval when fields is unset. - semantic: conceptual paper retrieval; supported for paper and all. - bm25_title_abstract / bm25: lexical paper matching over those fields. sort accepts relevance (default), year_desc, or year_asc. Semantic ranking cannot use year sorting; constrain re…

NameTypeReqDescription
author_id_or_url–––
date_from–––
date_to–––
fields–––
limitinteger––
offsetinteger––
provider–––
querystringyes–
ranking_profile–––
resource_kind–––
search_typestring––
sortstring––
venue–––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Lacuna Research MCP server?

Lacuna Research MCP is a hosted endpoint at https://lacuna.tiptreesystems.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · lacuna.tiptreesystems.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http tiptreesystems-lacuna-research-mcp 'https://lacuna.tiptreesystems.com/api/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Lacuna Research MCP server?

Lacuna Research MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.tiptreesystems/lacuna-research-mcp. Search Lacuna's ML research graph for papers, directions, authors, venues, and hypotheses. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://lacuna.tiptreesystems.com/api/mcp).

Is the Lacuna Research MCP server safe to use?

Lacuna Research MCP scores 76 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Lacuna Research MCP server expose?

Lacuna Research MCP exposes 13 tools: search_lacuna, get_hypothesis, get_direction, get_direction_papers, get_paper, and 8 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 2,581 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Lacuna Research MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Lacuna Research MCP without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Lacuna Research MCP server still maintained?

Lacuna Research MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.