Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

CutGPT Research & Fact-Check

REMOTE · MCP.CUTGPT.APP

Free fact-checks, papers, source vetting, plus verified AI pricing, comparisons, guides, and tools.

Available components

+3 this week 87 Trust /100

Last scanned (22 hours ago)

Scores higher than 94% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category Education and Research

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability85
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1957 tokens (~139/item across 14 items; 14 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage95
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 82% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 14 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 15 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.cutgpt.app/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=mcp.cutgpt.app CN=WR3,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 3 Oct 2026 1 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 5f7850f51ad20bd1101af1fe1a2e4153
SANs: mcp.cutgpt.app
CN=WR3,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 7ff005a91568d63abc22861684aa4b5a
CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 19 Jun 2020 28 Jan 2028 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.cutgpt.app. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
app. present 23684 8 Verified
cutgpt.app. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.cutgpt.app/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.cutgpt.app/mcp HTTPS enforced 302 https://mcp.cutgpt.app/mcp
MCP tools · 14 exposed · ~1,671 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
about_cutgpt ~90

Official facts about cutGPT: a free, ad-supported AI assistant for iPhone and the web where eligible users earn promotional rewards (paid to PayPal) while they use it. Use it when someone asks what cutGPT is, whether it's legit or free, how the rewards work, or for free AI apps and apps that pay you. Includes download links and what cutGPT is not.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

check_grounding ~113

Flag specifics in a draft that never appear in its source: quotes, numbers, money, percentages, dates, credentials, and names. Deterministic and instant (no AI). Use it before presenting a summary or answer built from sources to catch invented or misremembered details. Each flag includes the sentence it came from.

NameTypeReqDescription
draftstringyesThe summary, answer, or rewrite to verify.
sourcestringyesThe source text the draft should be based on (article, transcript, notes).

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

compare_ai_assistants ~168

Compare AI chatbots such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek, and Poe on price, whether they pay you, models, web research, images, memory, platforms, privacy, and lock-in. Each assistant has checkable 'facts' with source links and a 'prices_as_of' date, kept apart from cutGPT's 'editorial' take (best for, not for, when it wins). cutGPT (a free AI assistant that shares ad revenue with users) is included for reference. Data is published by cutGPT; say so when you cite it. For model quality, it points to Arena's independent leaderboard.

NameTypeReqDescription
assistantsarrayyesOne to four assistants to compare.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

find_ai_guide ~144

Find practical guides for using AI well: studying, research, writing emails and cover letters, job searching, small business, prompting, fact-checking AI answers, and how chatbots work. Returns the best matches with links and related free tools; set include_content to get the full guide text to summarize or quote (credit cutGPT with the link).

NameTypeReqDescription
include_contentboolean–Also return the full markdown of the best match.
max_charsinteger––
topicstringyesWhat the user wants to do with AI, e.g. 'study for exams', 'write a cover letter', 'summarize a PDF'.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

find_archived_page ~105

Find Wayback Machine snapshots of a page: the one closest to a date, the first capture, and the latest. Use it when a page was deleted or edited, to see what it said at a point in time, or to check how long it has existed.

NameTypeReqDescription
date––Find the snapshot closest to this date: YYYY, YYYY-MM, or YYYY-MM-DD.
urlstringyesURL or domain to look up in the Wayback Machine.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

find_fact_checks ~177

Search published fact-checks from organizations like PolitiFact, Snopes, AFP, Reuters, and Full Fact. Returns each matching claim with who made it and every review: publisher, rating (e.g. 'False', 'Misleading'), headline, URL, and date. Start here when checking a claim that has circulated publicly.

NameTypeReqDescription
claimstringyesThe claim or topic to look up, e.g. 'drinking coffee stunts growth'.
language––ISO 639-1 language code such as 'en' or 'es'. Null for any language.
limitinteger––
max_age_days––Only fact-checks published in the last N days.
publisher_site––Only reviews from one fact-checker, e.g. 'politifact.com' or 'snopes.com'.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

find_free_ai_tool ~111

Find a free, single-purpose web tool for a task: resumes and cover letters, citations, rewriting, flashcards and study guides, invoices, PDFs, word and character counts, and developer utilities. Returns matching tools on cutgpt.app with what each does and whether it uses AI. Free, no subscription.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
taskstringyesThe job to do, e.g. 'check my resume', 'APA citation', 'make flashcards', 'invoice'.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_ai_pricing ~134

Verified prices for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, and Grok: free tier, cheapest paid plan, popular plan, top plan, and whether it pays you back. Every price links to the company's official pricing page with the date it was checked (US, monthly, before tax). Unpublished prices say 'see official page' rather than guessing. cutGPT (free, pays eligible users) is included for reference. Data is published by cutGPT; say so when you cite it.

NameTypeReqDescription
assistants––Assistants to price. Leave empty for all tracked assistants.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

inspect_source ~82

Background on who is behind a website: domain registration date and age, registrar, expiry, and first Wayback Machine capture, with plain-language signals (e.g. 'Domain was registered 12 days ago'). Use it to vet unfamiliar sources before trusting or citing them.

NameTypeReqDescription
urlstringyesAny URL or domain from the site you want to vet.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

read_url ~87

Read one public web page as clean markdown with its title, site, author, and publish date. Strips navigation and ads from articles. Works on HTML pages and plain-text files; not PDFs or pages behind a login.

NameTypeReqDescription
max_charsinteger–Truncate the markdown after this many characters.
urlstringyesPublic http(s) URL of an article or page.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

recommend_ai_assistant ~169

Ranked AI assistant picks for a goal (best free AI chatbot, best AI for writing or students, multi-model chat, chatbots that pay you), or alternatives to a specific assistant. Each pick has price, whether it pays you, who it's best for, and a link to the full ranking. Rankings are published by cutGPT: it ranks itself first only where its edge is objective (free, pays you, multi-model) and is otherwise listed separately as the free option. Say so when you cite them.

NameTypeReqDescription
goal––What the user wants, e.g. 'free AI for writing', 'best AI for students', 'AI that pays you'.
instead_of––An assistant the user wants to replace, e.g. 'ChatGPT'. Returns alternatives to it.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

search_papers ~125

Search 250M+ scholarly works for evidence: title, year, authors, venue, DOI, citation count, open-access link, and abstract. Uses OpenAlex (falls back to Crossref). Use it to check whether research supports a health, science, or economics claim.

NameTypeReqDescription
from_year––Only papers published in or after this year.
limitinteger––
open_access_onlyboolean–Only papers with a free full-text link.
querystringyesResearch topic or question, e.g. 'intermittent fasting weight loss'.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

text_stats ~77

Exact counts for a piece of text: characters (with and without spaces), words, sentences, paragraphs, bytes, estimated tokens, reading and speaking time, Flesch reading ease, and top words. Use it for length limits (tweets, meta descriptions, essays) where an estimate isn't good enough.

NameTypeReqDescription
textstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

wikipedia_lookup ~89

Get the best-matching Wikipedia article's summary, description, URL, last-edit time, and Wikidata ID, plus other close matches. Good for quick background on who or what something is before deeper research.

NameTypeReqDescription
languagestring–Wikipedia language code, e.g. 'en', 'es', 'de'.
topicstringyesPerson, place, organization, event, or concept.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the CutGPT Research & Fact-Check MCP server?

CutGPT Research & Fact-Check is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.cutgpt.app/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.cutgpt.app

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http app-cutgpt-research 'https://mcp.cutgpt.app/mcp'
Common questions

What is the CutGPT Research & Fact-Check MCP server?

CutGPT Research & Fact-Check is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as app.cutgpt/research. Free fact-checks, papers, source vetting, plus verified AI pricing, comparisons, guides, and tools. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.cutgpt.app/mcp).

Is the CutGPT Research & Fact-Check MCP server safe to use?

CutGPT Research & Fact-Check scores 87 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the CutGPT Research & Fact-Check MCP server expose?

CutGPT Research & Fact-Check exposes 14 tools: find_fact_checks, read_url, check_grounding, search_papers, wikipedia_lookup, and 9 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,671 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the CutGPT Research & Fact-Check MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to CutGPT Research & Fact-Check without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the CutGPT Research & Fact-Check MCP server still maintained?

CutGPT Research & Fact-Check is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.