Probative legal-marketing data
REMOTE · PROBATIVEGROWTH.COM
Open US legal-marketing datasets with sources and DOIs, one server per dataset. CC BY 4.0.
Available components
Last scanned (10 hours ago)
Scores higher than 64% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Marketing and SEO
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 22273 tokens (~107/item across 208 items; 24 tools + 184 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management33
- Stability observed for 10 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage86
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 49% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 24 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 26 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
- Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Checks we ran (14)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
- Capabilities
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
- Tool “get_state_market_brief” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 3 Nov 26 +1
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- 2 Nov 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- New resource “proof-ledger” functional
- New resource “legal-hiring-demand-changes” functional
- New resource “legal-hiring-demand-index” functional
- 1 Nov 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “get_benchmark” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 19296 → 22173 ▼ functional
- New resource “search-demand-changes” functional
- New resource “population-change-index” functional
- New resource “population-change-changes” functional
- New resource “osha-enforcement-index” functional
- New resource “osha-enforcement-changes” functional
- New resource “noncitizen-population-index” functional
- New resource “noncitizen-population-changes” functional
- New resource “union-membership-index” functional
- New resource “legal-profession-figures-index” functional
- New resource “marriage-divorce-index” functional
- New resource “mortgage-delinquency-changes” functional
- New resource “mortgage-delinquency-index” functional
- New resource “union-membership-changes” functional
- New resource “serp-landscape-index” functional
- New resource “serp-landscape-changes” functional
- New resource “search-demand-index” functional
- New resource “marriage-divorce-changes” functional
- New resource “ad-costs-changes” functional
- New resource “ad-costs-index” functional
- New resource “certified-specialists-changes” functional
- New resource “certified-specialists-index” functional
- New resource “demand-per-law-office-changes” functional
- New resource “demand-per-law-office-index” functional
- New resource “flood-claims-changes” functional
- New resource “flood-claims-index” functional
- New resource “law-firm-websites-changes” functional
- New resource “law-firm-websites-index” functional
- New resource “legal-profession-figures-changes” functional
- “get_benchmark” added an optional parameter “public_table” cosmetic
- “get_benchmark” added an optional parameter “v5_table” cosmetic
- “cite” reworded the description of “dataset” cosmetic
- “data_compare” reworded the description of “dataset” cosmetic
- “data_search” reworded the description of “datasets” cosmetic
- “whats_new” reworded the description of “datasets” cosmetic
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Schema quality: 15860 → 19296 ▼ functional
- New resource “tx-nonsubscribers-changes” functional
- New resource “wc-benefits-index” functional
- New resource “wc-benefits-changes” functional
- New resource “fair-housing-index” functional
- New resource “hospital-safety-changes” functional
- New resource “hospital-safety-index” functional
- New resource “irs-databook-changes” functional
- New resource “irs-databook-index” functional
- New resource “legal-aid-orgs-changes” functional
- New resource “legal-aid-orgs-index” functional
- New resource “mine-accidents-changes” functional
- New resource “mine-accidents-index” functional
- New resource “mortgage-lending-changes” functional
- New resource “mortgage-lending-index” functional
- New resource “practice-official-changes” functional
- New resource “practice-official-index” functional
- New resource “tx-nonsubscribers-index” functional
- New resource “aviation-accidents-changes” functional
- New resource “aviation-accidents-index” functional
- New resource “boating-accidents-changes” functional
- New resource “boating-accidents-index” functional
- New resource “charge-deadlines-changes” functional
- New resource “charge-deadlines-index” functional
- New resource “court-fees-changes” functional
- New resource “court-fees-index” functional
- New resource “eviction-laws-changes” functional
- New resource “eviction-laws-index” functional
- New resource “fair-housing-changes” functional
- New resource “attorneys-changes” functional
- New resource “attorneys-index” functional
- New resource “crime-data-changes” functional
- New resource “crime-data-index” functional
- New resource “product-recalls-changes” functional
- New resource “product-recalls-index” functional
- Server version: 1.5.0 → 1.5.1 functional
- Server version: 1.4.0 → 1.5.0 functional
- “whats_new” added an optional parameter “practice” cosmetic
- “whats_new” added an optional parameter “state” cosmetic
- “cite” reworded the description of “dataset” cosmetic
- “data_compare” reworded the description of “dataset” cosmetic
- “data_search” reworded the description of “datasets” cosmetic
- “whats_new” reworded the description of “datasets” cosmetic
- 29 Oct 26 +1
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Schema quality: 11492 → 15860 ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 47% → 52% ▲ functional
- New resource “state-civil-rights-changes” functional
- New resource “business-applications-changes” functional
- New resource “business-applications-index” functional
- New resource “county-income-changes” functional
- New resource “county-income-index” functional
- New resource “device-events-changes” functional
- New resource “device-events-index” functional
- New resource “drug-events-changes” functional
- New resource “drug-events-index” functional
- New resource “evictions-changes” functional
- New resource “evictions-index” functional
- New resource “federal-filings-county-changes” functional
- New resource “federal-filings-county-index” functional
- New resource “firm-web-census-changes” functional
- New resource “firm-web-census-index” functional
- New resource “green-cards-changes” functional
- New resource “green-cards-index” functional
- New resource “ny-attorneys-changes” functional
- New resource “ny-attorneys-index” functional
- New resource “ny-workers-comp-changes” functional
- New resource “ny-workers-comp-index” functional
- New resource “rail-casualties-changes” functional
- New resource “rail-casualties-index” functional
- New resource “state-civil-rights-index” functional
- New resource “state-wage-claims-changes” functional
- New resource “state-wage-claims-index” functional
- New resource “toxic-releases-changes” functional
- New resource “toxic-releases-index” functional
- New resource “unemployment-changes” functional
- New resource “unemployment-index” functional
- New resource “uscis-offices-changes” functional
- New resource “uscis-offices-index” functional
- New resource “va-spending-changes” functional
- New resource “va-spending-index” functional
- New resource “warn-layoffs-changes” functional
- New resource “warn-layoffs-index” functional
- “cite” reworded the description of “dataset” cosmetic
- “data_compare” reworded the description of “dataset” cosmetic
- “data_search” reworded the description of “datasets” cosmetic
- “whats_new” reworded the description of “datasets” cosmetic
- 28 Oct 26 −1
We did not load change detail this far back for this component, so this day may have recorded more than is shown.
- Tool “cite” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “compare_states” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_state_rules” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “fetch” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_ad_filing_requirements” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_ad_platform_policies” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_attorney_fee_caps” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_benchmark” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_ca_court_filings” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_rule” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_spanish_demand_supply” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “calculate_fee_cap” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “check_ad_elements” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool coverage: 79% → 47% ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 4092 → 11492 ▼ functional
- First check of Capabilities: pass functional
- New tool “get_state_market_brief” functional
- “data_search” added an optional parameter “response_format” cosmetic
- “check_ad_elements” added an optional parameter “response_format” cosmetic
- “cite” added an optional parameter “response_format” cosmetic
- “compare_states” added an optional parameter “response_format” cosmetic
- “data_compare” added an optional parameter “response_format” cosmetic
- “data_lookup” added an optional parameter “response_format” cosmetic
- “get_ad_filing_requirements” added an optional parameter “response_format” cosmetic
- “get_ad_platform_policies” added an optional parameter “response_format” cosmetic
- “get_attorney_fee_caps” added an optional parameter “response_format” cosmetic
- “get_benchmark” added an optional parameter “response_format” cosmetic
- “get_ca_court_filings” added an optional parameter “response_format” cosmetic
- “get_rule” added an optional parameter “response_format” cosmetic
- “get_spanish_demand_supply” added an optional parameter “response_format” cosmetic
- “calculate_fee_cap” added an optional parameter “response_format” cosmetic
- “cite” reworded the description of “dataset” cosmetic
- “compare_states” reworded the description of “topic” cosmetic
- “data_compare” reworded the description of “dataset” cosmetic
- “data_lookup” reworded the description of “dataset” cosmetic
- “get_ad_platform_policies” reworded the description of “area” cosmetic
- “get_ad_platform_policies” reworded the description of “cursor” cosmetic
- “get_ad_platform_policies” reworded the description of “platform” cosmetic
- “get_attorney_fee_caps” reworded the description of “jurisdiction” cosmetic
- “get_attorney_fee_caps” reworded the description of “program” cosmetic
- “get_benchmark” reworded the description of “query” cosmetic
- “get_benchmark” reworded the description of “table” cosmetic
- “get_ca_court_filings” reworded the description of “county” cosmetic
- “get_ca_court_filings” reworded the description of “group” cosmetic
- “get_rule” reworded the description of “topic” cosmetic
- “get_spanish_demand_supply” reworded the description of “area” cosmetic
- “calculate_fee_cap” reworded the description of “award_usd” cosmetic
- “calculate_fee_cap” reworded the description of “jurisdiction” cosmetic
- “calculate_fee_cap” reworded the description of “program” cosmetic
- “calculate_fee_cap” reworded the description of “stage” cosmetic
- “check_ad_elements” reworded the description of “ad_text” cosmetic
- “get_benchmark” dropped the optional parameter “detail” cosmetic
- “check_ad_elements” dropped the optional parameter “detail” cosmetic
- “cite” dropped the optional parameter “detail” cosmetic
- “compare_states” dropped the optional parameter “detail” cosmetic
- “data_compare” dropped the optional parameter “detail” cosmetic
- “data_lookup” dropped the optional parameter “detail” cosmetic
- “get_ad_filing_requirements” dropped the optional parameter “detail” cosmetic
- “get_ad_platform_policies” dropped the optional parameter “detail” cosmetic
- “get_attorney_fee_caps” dropped the optional parameter “detail” cosmetic
- “get_state_rules” dropped the optional parameter “detail” cosmetic
- “data_search” dropped the optional parameter “detail” cosmetic
- “get_ca_court_filings” dropped the optional parameter “detail” cosmetic
- “get_rule” dropped the optional parameter “detail” cosmetic
- “get_spanish_demand_supply” dropped the optional parameter “detail” cosmetic
- “calculate_fee_cap” dropped the optional parameter “detail” cosmetic
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://probativegrowth.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=probativegrowth.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 28 Oct 2026 | 26 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 718290a1728078813422adc74ca22bb |
| SANs: probativegrowth.com, mta-sts.probativegrowth.com, *.mta-sts.probativegrowth.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of probativegrowth.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | DS published | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| probativegrowth.com. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://probativegrowth.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://probativegrowth.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://probativegrowth.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
calculate_fee_cap Calculate the legal limit on an attorney fee ~118
The most a lawyer may charge, in dollars, on one award, settlement or past-due benefit under a legal fee cap.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| award_usd | number | yes | The award, settlement or past-due benefits in US dollars (the… |
| jurisdiction | string | yes | Two-letter state code, DC, or US for federal programs (Social… |
| program | string | yes | – |
| response_format | string | – | – |
| stage | string | – | Optional: the stage, e.g. "administrative" or "litigation"… |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
check_ad_elements Which state ad rules an ad touches ~118
Which of one state's lawyer ad rules an ad touches, from what it contains (testimonials, past results, expert claims, actors, Spanish, AI) or its text. Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ad_text | string | – | Optional ad copy, script or landing-page text, scanned for… |
| elements | array | – | What the ad contains. Leave out to rely on ad_text only. |
| response_format | string | – | – |
| state | string | yes | Two-letter code (TX) or DC; full names also work |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
cite How to cite ~134
How to cite a dataset, a state or one record: the citation sentence, credit line, DOI and URL to cite. CC BY 4.0 asks for credit and a link.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dataset | string | – | A dataset id, e.g. rules, ad-costs, attorneys, aviation-accidents, bankruptcy. list_datasets lists every id. |
| id | string | – | Other datasets: the record id |
| response_format | string | – | – |
| state | string | – | rules only: two-letter code, or DC |
| topic | string | – | rules only: topic key, e.g. filing |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
compare_states Compare one rule across states ~83
Which states do what: one ad-rule topic (e.g. the waiting period before contacting accident victims, texting, filing) side by side across states, or all 50 and DC. Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| response_format | string | – | – |
| states | array | – | Two-letter codes. Leave out for every jurisdiction. |
| topic | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
data_compare Compare keys in a dataset ~97
Compare up to 10 states, counties or other keys of one dataset side by side, e.g. lawyer pay or bar pass rates in two states. Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dataset | string | yes | A dataset id, e.g. ad-costs, attorneys, aviation-accidents, bankruptcy, bar-pipeline. list_datasets lists every id. |
| keys | array | yes | – |
| response_format | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
data_lookup Look up one key in a dataset ~91
Figures for one state, county or other key from one open dataset, e.g. limitation periods, lawyers per resident, bankruptcy filings, law firms, court backlogs. Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dataset | string | yes | – |
| key | string | yes | The key, e.g. TX, google-ads, 19100, MDL-2738 |
| response_format | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
data_search Search the datasets ~104
Find records by words across the open datasets when you do not know the key, e.g. "nursing home abuse" or "legal services price index". Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| datasets | array | – | Dataset ids, e.g. ad-costs, attorneys, aviation-accidents, bankruptcy, bar-pipeline. list_datasets lists every id. |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
| response_format | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
fetch Fetch one legal-marketing record ~57
The full text of one record found with search (ids like rules:TX:filing, opinions:ny-nysba-1306 or benchmarks:speed-to-sign). Not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | An id from search |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_ad_filing_requirements Bar ad filing requirements and fees for one state ~68
Whether a state's bar requires lawyers to file or submit ads for review, which ads, when. Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| response_format | string | – | – |
| state | string | yes | Two-letter code (TX) or DC; full names (Texas) also work |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_ad_platform_policies Ad-platform policies for law-firm ads ~132
What Google Ads, Local Services Ads, Microsoft, Meta, LinkedIn, YouTube and ChatGPT ads allow for law-firm ads: eligibility, verification, targeting, creative. Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| area | string | – | – |
| cursor | string | – | The nextCursor from the previous page; leave out for the first… |
| limit | integer | – | Records per page (1 to 25) |
| platform | string | – | – |
| query | string | – | Words to match, e.g. "bail bonds" or "verification" |
| response_format | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_attorney_fee_caps Legal limits on attorney fees in one jurisdiction ~90
The fee-cap rules (percent and dollar limits on attorney fees) for one state or federal program: workers' comp, med-mal, contingency, SSDI, FTCA, VA. Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| jurisdiction | string | yes | Two-letter state code, DC, or US for federal programs; full… |
| program | string | – | – |
| response_format | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_benchmark Law-firm marketing benchmarks ~96
Anonymized law-firm marketing benchmarks (ad costs, call outcomes, speed to sign), as bands, tiers and rounded values with the methods page to cite.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| public_table | string | – | – |
| query | string | – | Optional words to keep only matching rows, e.g. "hour" or… |
| response_format | string | – | – |
| table | string | – | – |
| v5_table | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_ca_court_filings California court filings in one county ~92
California only: cases filed in one county's superior court (or CA for the whole state) in fiscal year 2024-25, by case type, with the prior year. Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| county | string | yes | County name ("Los Angeles", "san-diego") or CA for the… |
| group | string | – | – |
| response_format | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_rule One lawyer advertising rule in one state ~85
One state's lawyer advertising rule on one topic, e.g. can a firm text leads, record intake calls, pay referral fees, what disclaimer every ad must include. Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| response_format | string | – | – |
| state | string | yes | Two-letter code (TX), or DC. Full names (Texas) also work. |
| topic | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_spanish_demand_supply Spanish-language legal demand and lawyer supply in one area ~80
Spanish speakers with limited English per Spanish-speaking lawyer in one US state, DC, the US or a metro area (Census ACS). Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| area | string | yes | A state code (TX), DC, US, a metro code (26420), or a metro… |
| response_format | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_state_market_brief Law-firm market brief for one state ~81
Every public number about marketing a law firm in one state or DC, joined from seven open datasets. Each figure carries its source and check date. Not a forecast. Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| response_format | string | – | – |
| state | string | yes | Two-letter code (TX) or DC; full names (Texas) also work |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_state_rules Lawyer advertising rules for one state ~80
Every lawyer advertising rule for one US state or DC in one call: filing, disclaimers, waiting periods, claims, referrals, language, recording, texting, privacy. Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| response_format | string | – | – |
| state | string | yes | Two-letter code (TX), or DC. Full names (Texas) also work. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
list_datasets List the datasets ~61
Every public dataset on this server: what it covers, its version, DOI, license (CC BY 4.0), credit line, last-checked date, the page to cite, its files and its tools.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| response_format | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
list_mdl_dockets Federal MDL dockets by actions pending ~138
Federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) dockets from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's monthly pending-dockets reports, largest first. Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cursor | string | – | The nextCursor from the previous page; leave out for the first… |
| docket | string | – | One docket, e.g. MDL-2738 or 2738; returns its monthly history |
| limit | integer | – | Records per page (1 to 25) |
| query | string | – | Words in the docket title or court, e.g. "hernia mesh" |
| response_format | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
list_rule_changes Confirmed changes to the rules ~58
Recent confirmed changes to state lawyer advertising rules only, newest first, with the date, state, rules touched and primary source of each.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| response_format | string | – | – |
| since | string | – | Only changes on or after this day |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
search Search the legal-marketing records ~55
Id search for deep-research clients: returns ids, titles and URLs to read with fetch; the named tools answer one question directly.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | For example "Texas ad filing" or "pay per lead ethics opinion" |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
search_ethics_opinions Bar ethics opinions on lawyer marketing ~179
Bar ethics opinions (ABA and state) on lawyer marketing, e.g. pay-per-lead, Google reviews, AI chatbots, referral fees, social media. Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cursor | string | – | The nextCursor from the previous page; leave out for the first… |
| in_force_only | boolean | – | Leave out opinions marked withdrawn or superseded |
| limit | integer | – | Records per page (1 to 25) |
| query | string | – | Words to match, e.g. "Google reviews" or "pay per lead" |
| response_format | string | – | – |
| state | string | – | Two-letter code, DC, or ABA for the American Bar Association |
| topic | string | – | One of 27 values, e.g. advertising-general, fee-sharing, trade-names |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
search_rules Search the lawyer advertising rules ~70
Keyword search across all rule text, for a word or claim such as "expert" or "guaranteed results". Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | For example "Florida filing fee" or "expert" |
| response_format | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
whats_new What changed ~115
What changed lately in any of the datasets (or only the `datasets` named), newest first, with the date and source of each. Optional `since` (YYYY-MM-DD).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| datasets | array | – | Dataset ids, e.g. rules, ad-costs, attorneys, aviation-accidents, bankruptcy. list_datasets lists every id. |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| practice | string | – | – |
| response_format | string | – | – |
| since | string | – | – |
| state | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Probative legal-marketing data MCP server?
Probative legal-marketing data is a hosted endpoint at https://probativegrowth.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · probativegrowth.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-probativegrowth-legal-marketing-data 'https://probativegrowth.com/mcp'
What is the Probative legal-marketing data MCP server?
Probative legal-marketing data is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.probativegrowth/legal-marketing-data. Open US legal-marketing datasets with sources and DOIs, one server per dataset. CC BY 4.0. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://probativegrowth.com/mcp).
Is the Probative legal-marketing data MCP server safe to use?
Probative legal-marketing data scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Probative legal-marketing data MCP server expose?
Probative legal-marketing data exposes 24 tools: list_datasets, cite, data_lookup, get_benchmark, data_search, and 19 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 2,282 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Probative legal-marketing data MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Probative legal-marketing data without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Probative legal-marketing data MCP server still maintained?
Probative legal-marketing data is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Probative legal-marketing data MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 14 checks on Probative legal-marketing data, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 10 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.