Starlecta influencer tools
REMOTE · STARLECTA.COM
Instagram influencer lookup, compare, AI search, account check, Trend Cloud, Brand of the Day.
Available components
Last scanned (15 hours ago)
Scores higher than 64% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Marketing and SEO
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security83
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 748 tokens (~106/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management20
- Stability observed for 6 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage94
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 82% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
- Tool coverage: 55% → 82% ▲ functional
- “search_influencers” reworded the description of “category” cosmetic
- “search_influencers” reworded the description of “er_measured” cosmetic
- “search_influencers” reworded the description of “followers_max” cosmetic
- “search_influencers” reworded the description of “followers_min” cosmetic
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 0
- Tool “ai_search_influencers” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “ai_search_influencers” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “audit_influencer” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “lookup_influencer” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 90 → 106 ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 90 → 103 ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 50% → 55% ▲ functional
- Server version: 1.0.0 → 1.1.0 functional
- New tool “brand_of_the_day” functional
- Tool “audit_influencer” changed its title: Instagram account check → Global Account Check cosmetic
- 31 Oct 26 +1
- Tool “ai_search_influencers” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 414 → 543 ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 44% → 50% ▲ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- New tool “audit_influencer” functional
- 30 Oct 26 70
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://starlecta.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=starlecta.com | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 28 Oct 2026 | 26 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 6161d2e407ffc3a810b6d61ec8394b53f35 |
| SANs: *.starlecta.com, starlecta.com | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of starlecta.com. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | DS published | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| starlecta.com. | DS published | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| starlecta.com. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | frame-ancestors 'none' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), payment=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://starlecta.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://starlecta.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://starlecta.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
ai_search_influencers AI search for influencers ~138
One sentence in Turkish or English (2 to 200 characters), read as filters and niche words; the best candidates are then scored for relevance (detailed mode, about 30 seconds). Returns the count and up to two strong matches as open cards, each with the niches that matched (cards are ordered by relevance, then measured engagement, then followers; no score is returned); sometimes one or none. The ranking field tells how they were chosen. An optional safety object (flagged true, reason filtered or sensitive_condition) says details were withheld for privacy or safety; it never repeats the words.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| sentence | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
audit_influencer Global Account Check ~99
Reads one public Instagram account live and returns dated, counted metrics: followers, engagement rate over the latest items with n, average likes and comments, median Reel plays, posting frequency, Stories seen now, last post. Public accounts with 10,000+ followers. Not a score. Limited daily. Accounts Starlecta tracks every day show more in lookup_influencer.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| handle | string | yes | Instagram handle, with or without @ |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
brand_of_the_day Brand of the Day ~119
The brand or shopping platform of the day on Instagram in Turkey: last week's creators and contents against the week before, share of the conversation against its rivals, the head-to-head with rivals (Reel plays, likes and comments, average creator quality) and who it reached (gender, age, city, two top interests). Aggregate figures only; no creator is named. Optional day (YYYY-MM-DD) returns an earlier day. No key needed.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| day | string | – | A day, YYYY-MM-DD; the latest day when omitted |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
compare_influencers Compare two influencers ~59
Two influencers side by side on the same method and dates: followers, engagement rate and an engagement band.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | string | yes | Instagram handle, with or without @ |
| b | string | yes | Instagram handle, with or without @ |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
lookup_influencer Look up an influencer ~62
Public card of one Instagram influencer Starlecta tracks every day: tier, category, rounded followers and the measured engagement rate with its date. Status is open, tracked or not_listed.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| handle | string | yes | Instagram handle, with or without @ |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_influencers Search influencers by filters ~119
Count of matching influencers and up to two open cards. Filters: category code, tier (nano, micro, macro, mega), follower bounds, measured engagement only.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Category code: one of the listed values |
| er_measured | boolean | – | Only influencers whose engagement rate is measured |
| followers_max | integer | – | Upper follower bound: one of the listed values |
| followers_min | integer | – | Lower follower bound: one of the listed values; below followers_max |
| tier | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trend_cloud Trend Cloud ~45
What influencers share in the last 7 days: rising hashtags with post counts, and the most shared products, platforms and brands with share counts. Aggregate counts only; no key needed.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Starlecta influencer tools MCP server?
Starlecta influencer tools is a hosted endpoint at https://starlecta.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · starlecta.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-starlecta-influencer-tools 'https://starlecta.com/mcp'
What is the Starlecta influencer tools MCP server?
Starlecta influencer tools is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.starlecta/influencer-tools. Instagram influencer lookup, compare, AI search, account check, Trend Cloud, Brand of the Day. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://starlecta.com/mcp).
Is the Starlecta influencer tools MCP server safe to use?
Starlecta influencer tools scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Starlecta influencer tools MCP server expose?
Starlecta influencer tools exposes 7 tools: lookup_influencer, compare_influencers, search_influencers, ai_search_influencers, trend_cloud, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 641 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Starlecta influencer tools MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Starlecta influencer tools without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Starlecta influencer tools MCP server still maintained?
Starlecta influencer tools is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Starlecta influencer tools MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Starlecta influencer tools, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.