Probative legal-market research
REMOTE · PROBATIVEGROWTH.COM
US legal-market research by county and practice: demand, lawyer supply, ad rules. Sources, DOIs.
Available components
Last scanned (3 hours ago)
Scores higher than 60% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Marketing and SEO
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability72
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1512 tokens (~137/item across 11 items; 9 tools + 2 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management23
- Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage89
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 60% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 9 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 11 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
- New tool “get_practice_market” functional
- 30 Oct 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- The server changed its declared name: com.probativegrowth/legal-marketing-data → com.probativegrowth/legal-markets security
- Tool “compare_markets” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “demand_trend” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “market_profile” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “resolve” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “supply_gap” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 1060 → 1415 ▼ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- Server version: 1.5.0 → 1.5.1 functional
- Server version: 1.4.0 → 1.5.0 functional
- New tool “rank_markets” functional
- New tool “supply_trend” functional
- “resolve” reworded the description of “text” cosmetic
- 29 Oct 26 70
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://probativegrowth.com/mcp/markets
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=probativegrowth.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 28 Oct 2026 | 26 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 718290a1728078813422adc74ca22bb |
| SANs: probativegrowth.com, mta-sts.probativegrowth.com, *.mta-sts.probativegrowth.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of probativegrowth.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| probativegrowth.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://probativegrowth.com/mcp/markets | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://probativegrowth.com/mcp/markets | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://probativegrowth.com/mcp/markets |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare_markets Compare up to 10 markets ~96
The same practice-area figures for up to 10 states or counties side by side to compare, plus per-100. Not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| detail | string | – | – |
| lang | string | – | – |
| places | array | yes | States (TX, Florida) or counties (48201, "Cook County, IL") |
| practice | string | yes | Practice id (personal-injury, truck-accidents, employment-law… |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
demand_trend Rising or falling demand ~150
The time series each linked demand dataset holds for a state or county. Answers "are filings going up or down". Not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dataset | string | – | Only this dataset id or measure key (optional) |
| direction | string | – | – |
| kind | string | – | – |
| lang | string | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| minValue | number | – | Leave out changes whose larger value is below this |
| place | string | yes | A state (CA), a county FIPS (06037) or "County, ST" |
| practice | string | yes | Practice id (personal-injury, truck-accidents, employment-law… |
| sort | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_practice_market Google search volume and search-ad bid bands for one practice ~97
Google search volume (monthly searches for a lawyer, in English and Spanish, with the top queries and the month-by-month series) and the Google Ads top-of-page bid band…
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| lang | string | – | – |
| practice | string | yes | Practice or niche id (personal-injury, truck-accidents… |
| state | string | yes | Two-letter state code (TX), a state name, DC, or US for the… |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
market_profile Market profile for one place and practice ~128
All the figures, the whole picture, of one state or county and one practice area from the linked open datasets. Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| county | string | – | Optional county: five-digit FIPS (48201) or name ("Harris") |
| detail | string | – | – |
| dimensions | array | – | Only these dimensions (default all) |
| lang | string | – | – |
| practice | string | yes | Practice id (personal-injury, truck-accidents, employment-law… |
| state | string | yes | Two-letter state code (TX), a state name, or DC |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
rank_markets Rank states or counties by demand ~157
Ranks the states (state "US") or one state's counties by one demand count for the practice. A count, not a score. Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| lang | string | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| metric | string | – | Optional demand measure key (e.g.… |
| minValue | number | – | Leave out units whose count is below this (small counts make… |
| per100k | boolean | – | Rank by the count per 100,000 residents instead of the count |
| practice | string | yes | Practice id (personal-injury, truck-accidents, employment-law… |
| state | string | yes | Two-letter state code to rank its counties, or US to rank the… |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
resolve Resolve a place or practice to keys ~58
Turns a place and/or practice phrase into the keys every other tool takes. Only for turning words into keys; the other tools answer the questions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | string | yes | A place and/or practice phrase, EN or ES ("Condado de Los… |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
rules_check Ad rules for a state and practice ~88
The lawyer advertising rules (filing, required content, waiting periods, claims, referral, language, recording, texting, privacy). Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| lang | string | – | – |
| practice | string | yes | Practice id (personal-injury, truck-accidents, employment-law… |
| state | string | yes | Two-letter state code (TX), a state name, or DC |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
supply_gap Where demand per lawyer is high ~151
Ranks the states (state "US") or one state's counties by demand for each law office. No composite score. Not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| lang | string | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| metric | string | – | Optional demand measure key from options (e.g.… |
| minDemand | number | – | Leave out units whose demand count is below this (small counts… |
| practice | string | yes | Practice id (personal-injury, truck-accidents, employment-law… |
| state | string | yes | Two-letter state code to rank its counties, or US to rank the… |
| top | integer | – | Rank only the N units with the most demand (e.g. 25) |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
supply_trend Rising or falling lawyer supply ~148
The time series of lawyer supply (private law offices, and any other supply count with two periods) for a state or county. Results are not legal advice.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dataset | string | – | Only this dataset id or measure key (optional) |
| direction | string | – | – |
| lang | string | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| minValue | number | – | Leave out changes whose larger value is below this |
| place | string | yes | A state (CA), a county FIPS (06037) or "County, ST" |
| practice | string | yes | Practice id (personal-injury, truck-accidents, employment-law… |
| sort | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Probative legal-market research MCP server?
Probative legal-market research is a hosted endpoint at https://probativegrowth.com/mcp/markets, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · probativegrowth.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-probativegrowth-legal-markets 'https://probativegrowth.com/mcp/markets'
What is the Probative legal-market research MCP server?
Probative legal-market research is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.probativegrowth/legal-markets. US legal-market research by county and practice: demand, lawyer supply, ad rules. Sources, DOIs. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://probativegrowth.com/mcp/markets).
Is the Probative legal-market research MCP server safe to use?
Probative legal-market research scores 73 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Probative legal-market research MCP server expose?
Probative legal-market research exposes 9 tools: resolve, market_profile, supply_gap, compare_markets, get_practice_market, and 4 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,073 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Probative legal-market research MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Probative legal-market research without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Probative legal-market research MCP server still maintained?
Probative legal-market research is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.