Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

com.soofidigital/website-grader

REMOTE · GRADER.SOOFIDIGITAL.COM

Grade any website out of 100 for speed, SEO, trust and lead capture, with plain-English fixes.

+3 this week 75 Trust /100

Last scanned (49 minutes ago)

Scores higher than 64% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Marketing and SEO

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability77
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 365 tokens (~182/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management57
  • Stability observed for 17 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://grader.soofidigital.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=soofidigital.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 17 Oct 2026 15 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 b1829f94cadcd34c136a9be688b5635c
SANs: soofidigital.com, grader.soofidigital.com, *.grader.soofidigital.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of grader.soofidigital.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
soofidigital.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://grader.soofidigital.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://grader.soofidigital.com/mcp Inconclusive 405
MCP tools · 2 exposed · ~294 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
audit_website ~128

Grades a public website out of 100 (A–F) across speed & mobile (including Google's live PageSpeed mobile test), Google visibility (SEO), trust & security, and lead capture. Returns every problem ranked by impact with a plain-English fix, what already works, and a link to a shareable full report. Use when the user asks to audit, grade, check, review or analyse a website, its SEO, speed or conversion. Takes 10–40 seconds.

NameTypeReqDescription
urlstringyesThe website address, e.g. example.com or https://example.com/page

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

request_help ~166

Sends the user's request for help fixing their website to Soofi Digital's team, who will contact them by email or WhatsApp. Only use when the user explicitly asks for help or for Soofi Digital to contact them, and only with contact details the user has given you for this purpose. Confirm the details with the user before sending.

NameTypeReqDescription
businessstring–Optional business name
emailstringyesThe user's email address
messagestring–Optional: what they want help with, in their words
namestringyesThe user's name
phonestring–Optional WhatsApp/phone number with country code, e.g. +1 555 123 4567
websitestringyesThe website they want help with

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the com.soofidigital/website-grader MCP server?

com.soofidigital/website-grader is a hosted endpoint at https://grader.soofidigital.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · grader.soofidigital.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-soofidigital-website-grader 'https://grader.soofidigital.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the com.soofidigital/website-grader MCP server?

com.soofidigital/website-grader is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.soofidigital/website-grader. Grade any website out of 100 for speed, SEO, trust and lead capture, with plain-English fixes. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://grader.soofidigital.com/mcp).

Is the com.soofidigital/website-grader MCP server safe to use?

com.soofidigital/website-grader scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the com.soofidigital/website-grader MCP server expose?

com.soofidigital/website-grader exposes 2 tools: audit_website, request_help. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 294 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the com.soofidigital/website-grader MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to com.soofidigital/website-grader without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the com.soofidigital/website-grader MCP server still maintained?

com.soofidigital/website-grader is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.