PanelCompare
REMOTE · PANELCOMPARE.COM
SMM panel prices, trust scores and uptime: who is cheapest for each social media service
Available components
Last scanned (15 hours ago)
Scores higher than 64% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Marketing and SEO
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 664 tokens (~110/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management23
- Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage92
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 75% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 29 Oct 26 +49
- Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- HSTS header: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
- First check of Judged manipulation: pass security
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- First check of Schema quality: fail functional
- First check of Tool coverage: 75 functional
- First check of Destructive annotations: pass functional
- First check of Schema quality: pass functional
- First check of Schema quality: good functional
- 28 Oct 26 23
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://panelcompare.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=panelcompare.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 4 Nov 2026 | 2 Feb 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 8ad0822fe64b889b13fe10e218b32162 |
| SANs: panelcompare.com, *.panelcompare.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of panelcompare.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| panelcompare.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), interest-cohort=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://panelcompare.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://panelcompare.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://panelcompare.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare_service_prices Compare prices for one service ~139
Who sells one service (e.g. Instagram followers, TikTok views, Spotify plays) and at what price per 1,000, cheapest first, with the market price index for it: median, quartiles and the quotable cheapest/dearest. Use list_services for valid platform and service slugs.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| minTrust | number | – | – |
| platform | string | yes | e.g. "instagram" |
| quotableOnly | boolean | – | Leave out single-order packages and listings priced 10x+ below the median (usually mis-filed). |
| service | string | yes | e.g. "followers" |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_panel Get one SMM panel ~95
One SMM panel's full profile on PanelCompare: trust and component scores with how much evidence backs them, uptime, features, payment methods, supply chain, and its cheapest listing for each service it sells, each with the market median for comparison. Use the slug from search_panels.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| services | integer | – | How many services to list. |
| slug | string | yes | Panel slug, e.g. "justanotherpanel". |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_price_index SMM price index ~73
The latest daily price index: for every service, the median, quartiles and quotable cheapest/dearest price per 1,000 across all panels, with how many panels sell it. Optionally one platform only.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| platform | string | – | Platform slug, e.g. "youtube". Omit for all. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_services List services ~53
The canonical services PanelCompare tracks (platform and service slugs, unit, reference price range), optionally for one platform.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| platform | string | – | Platform slug, e.g. "tiktok". Omit for all. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
market_stats SMM panel market totals ~31
Totals across the index: panels tracked, platforms, canonical services, listings, and the cheapest quotable rate.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_panels Search SMM panels ~186
Find SMM panels (wholesale social-media-marketing resellers) tracked by PanelCompare, ranked by score, price, trust or uptime, optionally filtered by platform, payment method, feature or minimum trust score. Returns each panel with its trust score (0-100), overall score (0-10), 30-day uptime and its PanelCompare page.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| feature | string | – | A feature the panel must offer. |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| minTrust | number | – | Minimum trust score. |
| payment | string | – | Payment method slug, e.g. "paypal", "crypto", "usdt". |
| platform | string | – | Platform slug the panel must sell, e.g. "instagram", "tiktok", "youtube". |
| query | string | – | Name or domain, e.g. "justanotherpanel". |
| sort | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the PanelCompare MCP server?
PanelCompare is a hosted endpoint at https://panelcompare.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · panelcompare.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-panelcompare-panelcompare 'https://panelcompare.com/mcp'
What is the PanelCompare MCP server?
PanelCompare is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.panelcompare/panelcompare. SMM panel prices, trust scores and uptime: who is cheapest for each social media service. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://panelcompare.com/mcp).
Is the PanelCompare MCP server safe to use?
PanelCompare scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the PanelCompare MCP server expose?
PanelCompare exposes 6 tools: search_panels, get_panel, compare_service_prices, get_price_index, list_services, market_stats. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 577 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the PanelCompare MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to PanelCompare without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the PanelCompare MCP server still maintained?
PanelCompare is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.