Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

GoMobSec

PYPI · GOMOBSEC-MCP · 2 COMPONENTS

Scan Android and iOS apps for security issues: findings, MASVS mapping and pentest reports.

67 Trust /100

Last scanned (5 hours ago)

Scores higher than 65% of PyPI servers

Category Security

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security50
  • Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • 1 of 31 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to UsamaSarwar121/gomobsec-mcp). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 2 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability79
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 608 tokens (~76/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management17
  • Stability observed for 5 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (15)

  • Known CVEs
  • Install scripts
  • Dependency health
  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Checks we could not complete (1)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • Malware scan in Supply Chain SecurityMalware scan not yet available for this package.

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 2 Nov 26 −14
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Stability: unverified → 0.07 ▲ functional
    • Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.2.1 functional
  • 1 Nov 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 31 Oct 26 65

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/gomobsec-mcp@0.2.1

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem pypi
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo UsamaSarwar121/gomobsec-mcp
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/UsamaSarwar121/gomobsec-mcp/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/tags/v0.2.1
Rekor log index 3643659450
Predicate type PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1
Subject digest sha256:16ff96a8c6b0b2f2b96dfcffea86020112a77c4c93516366367acd6d35586216

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend Known build tool hatchling.build

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 31 packages
Packages resolved 31
No linked repository 1
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 8 exposed · ~474 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
download_report ~92

Download the full report of a completed scan — DOCX (pentest report), XLSX, JSON or SARIF (for code-scanning tools) — into the GoMobSec download folder (GOMOBSEC_DOWNLOAD_DIR, default ~/Downloads/gomobsec). Never overwrites an existing file. Returns the saved path.

NameTypeReqDescription
formatstring––
scan_idstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

get_findings ~87

Findings of a completed scan: severity, title, CWE, MASVS category, CVSS, location and description, most severe first. Optionally filter by severity. False positives are left out unless include_false_positives is true.

NameTypeReqDescription
include_false_positivesboolean––
limitinteger––
scan_idstringyes–
severity–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

get_scan ~31

Status of one scan and, once complete, its findings count by severity.

NameTypeReqDescription
scan_idstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

get_usage ~22

How many scans the account has used this month against its plan limit.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

list_scans ~31

List the account's most recent scans, newest first (1-50).

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

start_scan ~119

Upload a local Android (.apk, .xapk, .apks, .apkm) or iOS (.ipa) app to GoMobSec and start a security scan. Uses one scan from the account's plan — confirm with the user first. 'quick' and 'static' work on every plan; 'full' (static + dynamic) needs a paid plan. Returns the scan id; follow it with wait_for_scan.

NameTypeReqDescription
file_pathstringyes–
project_name–––
scan_modestring––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

wait_for_scan ~72

Wait until a scan finishes (or the timeout passes, 1-60 minutes), reporting progress, then return its status and findings count. Scans can take longer than one wait; call it again if the scan is still running.

NameTypeReqDescription
scan_idstringyes–
timeout_minutesinteger––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

whoami ~20

Show which GoMobSec account is connected and its plan.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the GoMobSec MCP server?

GoMobSec runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx gomobsec-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · gomobsec-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add usamasarwar121-gomobsec-mcp -- uvx gomobsec-mcp
Common questions

What is the GoMobSec MCP server?

GoMobSec is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.UsamaSarwar121/gomobsec-mcp. Scan Android and iOS apps for security issues: findings, MASVS mapping and pentest reports. This page covers its PyPI package (gomobsec-mcp).

Is the GoMobSec MCP server safe to use?

GoMobSec scores 67 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the GoMobSec MCP server expose?

GoMobSec exposes 8 tools: whoami, get_usage, list_scans, get_scan, get_findings, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 474 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the GoMobSec MCP server still maintained?

GoMobSec is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the GoMobSec MCP server under?

GoMobSec declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the GoMobSec MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 15 checks on GoMobSec, covering Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health, Source repository and 11 more. One item could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about GoMobSec: Malware scan. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to a PyPI package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.