Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp

PYPI · ITSOC-MCP

Read-only MCP server over a local log-analysis backend; a client that computes no verdicts.

Available components

0 this week 66 Trust /100

Last scanned (9 hours ago)

Scores higher than 63% of PyPI servers

Category Security

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security50
  • Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Runs setuptools.build_meta at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • 0 of 28 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency19
Schema Quality & AI Usability84
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 750 tokens (~107/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (15)

  • Known CVEs
  • Install scripts
  • Dependency health
  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Checks we could not complete (1)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • Malware scan in Supply Chain SecurityMalware scan not yet available for this package.

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
  • 4 Nov 26 0
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 31 Oct 26 +15
    • Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
  • 30 Oct 26 0
    • Provenance: fail → unverified ▼ security
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 29 Oct 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 26 Oct 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 24 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 23 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/itsoc-mcp@0.1.0

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem pypi
Reason No attestation published

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend Known build tool setuptools.build_meta

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 28 packages
Packages resolved 28
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~750 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
analyze_log ~118

Run the project's existing analysis over a local log file OR an http(s) URL and return a run summary (run_id, severity counts, lines parsed/unparsed, unrecognized flag, detector sha256). Verdicts are rule-owned by the frozen detector; this only relays them. An unrecognized format returns '0 lines parsed', never a fake all-clear.

NameTypeReqDescription
compareboolean–Also run the rules-vs-LLM comparison pass.
sourcestringyesA local file path or an http(s) URL to analyze.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

explain_finding ~98

Advisory LLM explanation for ONE finding via the existing /api/explain endpoint. The explanation is ADVISORY only — it never changes, suppresses, or escalates the rule verdict. Prose is redacted by default. An unreachable model is an honest error, never a made-up explanation.

NameTypeReqDescription
finding_idstringyesFinding id from get_findings.
run_idstring–Optional; must be the active run.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

export_run ~106

Export the ACTIVE run via /api/export (csv|html|xml|json|md). When idle the backend returns 409 and this relays it honestly — never an empty file. The export carries raw log text, so content is withheld by default (size + sha256 returned); set ITSOC_MCP_TRUSTED_LOCAL=1 to receive it inline.

NameTypeReqDescription
formatstring–Export format.
run_idstring–Optional; must be the active run.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_evidence ~105

Real evidence lines + rule predicate + timeline for ONE finding in the active run. Raw log lines and timeline labels pass through the console/redact.py egress choke point and are REDACTED by default; set ITSOC_MCP_TRUSTED_LOCAL=1 for raw text. Evidence is verbatim source (masked), never fabricated.

NameTypeReqDescription
finding_idstringyesFinding id from get_findings.
run_idstring–Optional; must be the active run.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_findings ~146

Filtered findings for the ACTIVE run, with rule-owned severity, rule_id, and derived MITRE tags. Filter by severity/rule/host and limit. Host/title are redacted by default (entity-bearing text). A non-current run_id is an honest error — this server does not switch the active run.

NameTypeReqDescription
hoststring–host substring filter.
limitinteger–max findings (default 50).
rulestring–rule_id substring filter.
run_idstring–Optional; must be the active run. Omit to use it.
severitystring–CRITICAL|HIGH|MEDIUM|LOW filter (exact).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_runs ~48

List saved analysis runs from the backend's run history (read-only). Returns run_id, label, finding count, and the current run. Empty when there are no runs — never a fabricated entry.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

threat_intel_lookup ~129

OFFLINE STIX->MITRE lookup for one IPv4 address, reusing the project's existing offline threat-intel code (no network egress). Match + severity come from threat_intel/threat_detector.py; MITRE tags are derived. No bundle configured -> honest n/a; no match -> honest 'no match', never a fake all-clear. Bundle path via arg or ITSOC_STIX_BUNDLE.

NameTypeReqDescription
bundle_pathstring–Optional local STIX bundle path (overrides ITSOC_STIX_BUNDLE).
ipstringyesIPv4 address to look up.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp server?

io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx itsoc-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · itsoc-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add ankit512-itsoc-mcp -- uvx itsoc-mcp
Common questions

What is the io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp server?

io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp. Read-only MCP server over a local log-analysis backend; a client that computes no verdicts. This page covers its PyPI package (itsoc-mcp).

Is the io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp server safe to use?

io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp scores 66 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp server expose?

io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp exposes 7 tools: analyze_log, list_runs, get_findings, get_evidence, explain_finding, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 750 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp server still maintained?

io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp server under?

io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp server?

VerifyMCP ran 15 checks on io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp, covering Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health, Source repository and 11 more. One item could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about io.github.Ankit512/itsoc-mcp: Malware scan. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to a PyPI package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.