Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

TutorPing

REMOTE · TUTORPING.AI

Find and book independent tutors, or find students asking for a tutor in your subject.

Available components

+1 this week 85 Trust /100

Last scanned (40 minutes ago)

Scores higher than 91% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Education and Research

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1031 tokens (~128/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
  • Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage88
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 63% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 −1
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 1 Nov 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://tutorping.ai/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=jeanie.dev CN=WR3,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 1 Nov 2026 30 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 369c2cab6572a3f412d80087922fb156
SANs: jeanie.dev, consumidor.sidneinardini.com.br, deep.stg-native.plugo.co.jp, sovereignwealtharchitecture.com, www.sizzle.pt, somunahotel.com, theretowhere.com, oragschedule.com, pollysul.com.br, api.dps-ims.lecien.com, wesleyarcade.com, sunylyons.com and 88 more
CN=WR3,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 7ff005a91568d63abc22861684aa4b5a
CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 19 Jun 2020 28 Jan 2028 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d
CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 1 Sept 1998 28 Jan 2028 RSA 2048 SHA1-RSA 40000000001154b5ac394

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of tutorping.ai. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
ai. present 1814, 3799 8, 8 Verified
tutorping.ai. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31556926

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://tutorping.ai/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://tutorping.ai/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://tutorping.ai/mcp
MCP tools · 8 exposed · ~928 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
ask_tutorping ~74

Ask anything about TutorPing, finding a tutor, or finding tutoring students that the other tools don't cover, in plain words. Returns which TutorPing tool or page fits, plus contact details. Do not include personal information.

NameTypeReqDescription
askedForstring–Who the question is for
questionstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_tutor ~33

Full public profile for one TutorPing tutor (by slug from search_tutors).

NameTypeReqDescription
slugstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_tutor_availability ~43

Open session times for a tutor, in the tutor's timezone. Use before request_booking.

NameTypeReqDescription
daysinteger––
slugstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

how_to_get_leads ~29

Explains how a tutor gets student leads from TutorPing and connects their own AI assistant.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

request_booking ~134

Book a student into one of a tutor's open slots (from get_tutor_availability). The tutor and the student both get a confirmation email. Confirm the time, name, and email with the user before calling.

NameTypeReqDescription
datestringyesYYYY-MM-DD
slugstringyes–
studentEmailstringyes–
studentNamestringyes–
subjectstring––
timestringyesHH:MM, 24h, tutor's timezone — must match an open slot
typestring–"trial" only if the tutor offers a free trial

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

request_tutor ~299

Submit a request for TutorPing to match a student with a tutor, when search_tutors finds no fit or the user prefers to be matched. TutorPing replies by email within 1 business day with tutor options. Collect what the student needs, then confirm the details AND get the user's explicit agreement that TutorPing may share the request and contact details with matching tutors before calling. Ask only for a first name, never a child's full name.

NameTypeReqDescription
budgetPerHournumber–USD per hour
consentbooleanyesThe user agreed TutorPing may share this request and contact details with matching tutors
emailstringyesWhere TutorPing should send tutor options
levelstring–e.g. "11th grade", "college", "adult beginner"
locationstring–City or area for in-person; omit if online only
notesstring–Goals, current scores, anything a tutor should know
onlineboolean–true if online sessions are fine
phonestring––
schedulestring–e.g. "weekday evenings, test on Dec 6"
studentFirstNamestring––
subjectstringyese.g. "SAT math", "AP Chemistry", "piano"
tutorRefstring–tutorRef of a profile from search_tutors the user liked; TutorPing asks that tutor first

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_tutors ~232

Find independent tutors on TutorPing by subject, student level, and location. Returns tutors with a public page (subject, level, location, rate, reviews, page link, whether they can be booked directly), how many matching tutors TutorPing has in total with their profiles minus names (request_tutor matches the student with one, optionally a chosen tutorRef), and free TutorPing AI Tutors for the subject (clearly AI, not people; a chat link for help right now). Use for students or parents looking for a tutor (SAT/ACT, math, science, languages, music, and more). If no listed tutor fits, use request_tutor and TutorPing will match one. Always tell the user that an AI tutor is AI.

NameTypeReqDescription
levelstring–e.g. "high school", "college"
locationstring–City or area, e.g. "NYC". Omit for online tutors anywhere.
maxHourlyRatenumber–USD per hour
subjectstring–e.g. "SAT", "chemistry", "piano"

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

tutoring_demand ~84

How many people online recently asked for a tutor in a subject (from Reddit and other communities TutorPing monitors), in total. Useful for tutors deciding whether there is demand for their subject. The requests themselves are only shared with TutorPing tutors.

NameTypeReqDescription
daysinteger––
subjectstringyese.g. "SAT", "organic chemistry", "piano"

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the TutorPing MCP server?

TutorPing is a hosted endpoint at https://tutorping.ai/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · tutorping.ai

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http ai-tutorping-tutorping 'https://tutorping.ai/mcp'
Common questions

What is the TutorPing MCP server?

TutorPing is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as ai.tutorping/tutorping. Find and book independent tutors, or find students asking for a tutor in your subject. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://tutorping.ai/mcp).

Is the TutorPing MCP server safe to use?

TutorPing scores 85 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the TutorPing MCP server expose?

TutorPing exposes 8 tools: search_tutors, request_tutor, get_tutor, get_tutor_availability, request_booking, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 928 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the TutorPing MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to TutorPing without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the TutorPing MCP server still maintained?

TutorPing is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.