Tech.eu Funding Explorer
REMOTE · FUNDING.TECH.EU
Search European tech funding rounds, companies, investors and exits — sourced, EUR-normalized.
Available components
Last scanned (14 hours ago)
Scores higher than 94% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 7 Nov 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1111 tokens (~138/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage96
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 88% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 6 Nov 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 29 Oct 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- “market_map” reworded the description of “period” cosmetic
- 28 Oct 26 0
- Tool “market_map” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 15 Sept 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- 1 Sept 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Schema quality: 116 → 130 ▼ functional
- New tool “list_changes” functional
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 7 Nov 2026 · Probed https://funding.tech.eu/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=funding.tech.eu | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 16 Sept 2026 | 15 Dec 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 59d3cc081b1e5ca21e1c437ce85a1ec1362 |
| SANs: funding.tech.eu | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of funding.tech.eu. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| eu. | DS published | 35926 | 8 | Verified |
| tech.eu. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; form-action 'self'; img-src 'self' data: https:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://va.vercel-scripts.com; connect-src 'self' https://va.vercel-scripts.com https://*.vercel-insights.com https://vitals.vercel-insights.com; font-src 'self' data:; frame-src 'self'; manifest-src 'self' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), browsing-topics=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://funding.tech.eu/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://funding.tech.eu/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://funding.tech.eu/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
find_companies ~62
Find companies by name (case-insensitive substring). Returns id, location and verified funding totals; pass the id to get_company for the full profile.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | Company name or fragment, e.g. "Theker", "mistral" |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_company ~64
Full company profile: description, location, sectors, every funding round with stage/amount/investors, named backers, exit if any. Figures are source-linked on the company page URL.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | Company id from find_companies or search_rounds |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_investor ~84
Investor profile: deal count, companies backed, stage mix, portfolio and recent deals.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| compact | boolean | – | Lean profile to save context: top 15 portfolio companies by €, top co-investors, no year-by-year breakdown |
| name | string | yes | Investor display name, e.g. "Accel" or "High-Tech Gründerfonds (HTGF)" |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_changes ~206
Incremental sync: what was ADDED or REMOVED since a timestamp. Use this — not repeated search_rounds calls — when you keep a local copy in step with the dataset. Sorted oldest-first by ingestion time, so `nextCursor` is resumable: store the last one and start there next run. Reports additions and removals only; the source tables have no modification timestamp, so a silent edit to an existing row is not reported (re-read that record by id when you need its current state). Exits are not available here — that table has no ingestion timestamp.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| after | string | – | Opaque nextCursor from a previous call |
| limit | number | – | Max results (default 25, cap 100) |
| since | string | yes | Start of the window: a date (YYYY-MM-DD) or the ISO timestamp your last sync ended at |
| type | string | – | What to sync — "rounds" (default) or "companies" |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
market_map ~122
Aggregate the European funding picture for a period in ONE call: totals (disclosed €, split into equity / debt / grant €, rounds, companies, investors, exits), concentration, and breakdowns by country, sector and stage — with provenance (disclosed %, high-confidence %, ECB reconciliation Δ). Beats paging every round to sum client-side. Defaults to the current year.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| period | string | – | A year ("2026"), half-year ("2026-h1"), quarter ("2026-q1") or month ("2026-01"); defaults to the current year |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_exits ~141
European tech exits and M&A (acquisitions, IPOs), newest first with a nextCursor. Filter by date window and by the exited company's country (use it for "European exits"). Most deal values are undisclosed — valueEur is null in ~65% of exits.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| after | string | – | Opaque nextCursor from a previous call |
| country | string | – | Exited company country, e.g. "UK", "Germany", "France" |
| from | string | – | Earliest exit date, YYYY-MM-DD |
| limit | number | – | – |
| to | string | – | Latest exit date, YYYY-MM-DD |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_investors ~81
Search investors (entity-resolved: name variants are merged). Sortable by deal count or company count.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | number | – | – |
| query | string | – | Investor name or fragment, e.g. "accel" |
| sort | string | – | – |
| type | string | – | Investor type filter, e.g. "Venture Capital" |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_rounds ~206
Search European tech funding rounds (cited, EUR-normalized at the ECB rate on the round date). Returns newest first with a `nextCursor` for pagination.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| after | string | – | Opaque nextCursor from a previous call |
| country | string | – | Country filter, e.g. "UK", "Germany", "France", "Türkiye" |
| from | string | – | Earliest round date, YYYY-MM-DD |
| limit | number | – | Max results (default 25, cap 100) |
| minAmountEur | number | – | Only rounds of at least this many EUR |
| sector | string | – | Sector filter (canonical), e.g. "AI", "Fintech", "Healthtech", "Software", "Cleantech", "Energy" |
| stage | string | – | Stage filter, e.g. "Seed", "Series A", "Debt", "Grant" |
| to | string | – | Latest round date, YYYY-MM-DD |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Tech.eu Funding Explorer MCP server?
Tech.eu Funding Explorer is a hosted endpoint at https://funding.tech.eu/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · funding.tech.eu
claude mcp add --transport http eu-tech-funding-funding-explorer 'https://funding.tech.eu/api/mcp'
What is the Tech.eu Funding Explorer MCP server?
Tech.eu Funding Explorer is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as eu.tech.funding/funding-explorer. Search European tech funding rounds, companies, investors and exits, sourced, EUR-normalized. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://funding.tech.eu/api/mcp).
Is the Tech.eu Funding Explorer MCP server safe to use?
Tech.eu Funding Explorer scores 87 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Tech.eu Funding Explorer MCP server expose?
Tech.eu Funding Explorer exposes 8 tools: search_rounds, find_companies, get_company, search_investors, get_investor, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 966 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Tech.eu Funding Explorer MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Tech.eu Funding Explorer without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Tech.eu Funding Explorer MCP server still maintained?
Tech.eu Funding Explorer is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 7 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Tech.eu Funding Explorer MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Tech.eu Funding Explorer, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.