FairPath Property-Tax Evidence
REMOTE · MCP.FAIRPATH.APP
Sourced property-tax protest facts; homeowner reviews and files. Not a law firm; no outcome claims.
Available components
Last scanned (23 hours ago)
Scores higher than 94% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability77
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 368 tokens (~122/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage95
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 83% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 15 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 14 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 10 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 7 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 5 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.fairpath.app/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=mcp.fairpath.app | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 12 Oct 2026 | 10 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 5d7b78af9e6af12ca3d8e1bb1f4182d57d0 |
| SANs: mcp.fairpath.app | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of mcp.fairpath.app. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| app. | present | 23684 | 8 | Verified |
| fairpath.app. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), payment=(self) |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.fairpath.app/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.fairpath.app/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://mcp.fairpath.app/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
fairpath_check_property Check A Consented Property ~157
Look up a homeowner-provided address and return bounded property context. This requires explicit address consent, creates a private audit record, and may create or reuse short-lived scoped session and consent records. It does not expose owner, payment, or raw county records or change an external system.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| address | string | yes | The homeowner-provided property address to check. |
| addressConsentGranted | boolean | yes | Must be true only after the homeowner explicitly consents to address lookup. |
| consentEvidenceId | string | yes | Opaque, non-PII id for the client-side consent event. FairPath stores only its hash. |
| consentedAt | string | yes | When the homeowner explicitly approved this address lookup. |
| context | object | – | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| complianceFooter | object | yes | – |
| confidenceLevel | string | yes | – |
| countyCaveats | array | yes | – |
| countyKnowledgeDensity | object | – | – |
| data | object | yes | – |
| directAnswer | string | yes | – |
| evidenceGaps | array | yes | – |
| informationPosture | string | – | Transitional compatibility field: current broker responses include it, while older broker deployments may omit it during the coordinated rollout. |
| nextAvailableFairPathAction | object | yes | – |
| redaction | object | yes | – |
| sourcesUsed | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
fairpath_explain_evidence_packet Explain A FairPath Evidence Packet ~56
Explain the evidence categories FairPath can organize into a homeowner-reviewed property-tax evidence packet. This creates a private FairPath audit record but does not recommend a filing position, predict an outcome, or change an external system.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| complianceFooter | object | yes | – |
| confidenceLevel | string | yes | – |
| countyCaveats | array | yes | – |
| countyKnowledgeDensity | object | – | – |
| data | object | yes | – |
| directAnswer | string | yes | – |
| evidenceGaps | array | yes | – |
| informationPosture | string | – | Transitional compatibility field: current broker responses include it, while older broker deployments may omit it during the coordinated rollout. |
| nextAvailableFairPathAction | object | yes | – |
| redaction | object | yes | – |
| sourcesUsed | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
fairpath_get_county_requirements Get FairPath County Requirements ~81
Return public, CIE-backed county property-tax filing guidance and source metadata. This creates a private FairPath audit record but does not make a filing recommendation or change an external system.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| countyId | string | yes | FairPath county id in the form county_state, for example johnson_ks, cook_il, or harris_tx. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| complianceFooter | object | yes | – |
| confidenceLevel | string | yes | – |
| countyCaveats | array | yes | – |
| countyKnowledgeDensity | object | – | – |
| data | object | yes | – |
| directAnswer | string | yes | – |
| evidenceGaps | array | yes | – |
| informationPosture | string | – | Transitional compatibility field: current broker responses include it, while older broker deployments may omit it during the coordinated rollout. |
| nextAvailableFairPathAction | object | yes | – |
| redaction | object | yes | – |
| sourcesUsed | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the FairPath Property-Tax Evidence MCP server?
FairPath Property-Tax Evidence is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.fairpath.app/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.fairpath.app
claude mcp add --transport http heintzsight-fairpath-property-tax-evidence 'https://mcp.fairpath.app/mcp'
What is the FairPath Property-Tax Evidence MCP server?
FairPath Property-Tax Evidence is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Heintzsight/fairpath-property-tax-evidence. Sourced property-tax protest facts; homeowner reviews and files. Not a law firm; no outcome claims. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.fairpath.app/mcp).
Is the FairPath Property-Tax Evidence MCP server safe to use?
FairPath Property-Tax Evidence scores 87 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the FairPath Property-Tax Evidence MCP server expose?
FairPath Property-Tax Evidence exposes 3 tools: fairpath_get_county_requirements, fairpath_explain_evidence_packet, fairpath_check_property. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 294 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the FairPath Property-Tax Evidence MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to FairPath Property-Tax Evidence without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the FairPath Property-Tax Evidence MCP server still maintained?
FairPath Property-Tax Evidence is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.