Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log

NPM · @FORESTRIE/MCP-REGISTER

Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log, verify receipts, buy grants via x402 within caps

+3 this week 84 Trust /100

Last scanned (13 hours ago)

Scores higher than 81% of npm servers

Category Crypto and Web3

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security81
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects @modelcontextprotocol/sdk 1.30.0, a direct dependency. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 30 of 116 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency97
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to forestrie/mcp-register). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 3 days ago).Pass
  • Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2184 tokens (~312/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management63
  • Stability observed for 19 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (16)

  • Malware scan
  • Known CVEs
  • Install scripts
  • Dependency health
  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 0
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.47 → unverified ▼ security
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • Schema quality: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • Package version: 0.2.1 → 0.3.0 functional
  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 0
    • GHSA-f897-62hf-6gxq affects this package: high ▼ security
  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@forestrie/mcp-register@0.3.0

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo forestrie/mcp-register
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/forestrie/mcp-register/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/tags/v0.3.0
Rekor log index 3636490355
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:edcb4a7a01b004523a194f741373ee1685ac47639430cd5158553126cde30223cce3cbad8d18c065cfab5293a0d9d71e66c5b811ce4d98de22b5732d5

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Vulnerabilities 6 findings
ID CVE Severity Vector Fix available
GHSA-22jm-h49p-29qw CVE-2026-111767 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L yes
GHSA-46jr-4wx8-v453 CVE-2026-111768 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yes
GHSA-6prh-2h8m-c8cw CVE-2026-111769 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N yes
GHSA-6qxp-vccf-f47h CVE-2026-104850 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N yes
GHSA-f897-62hf-6gxq high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yes
GHSA-rvq5-wwqv-78pq CVE-2026-111771 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N yes

Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →

Dependencies 116 packages
Packages resolved 116
Stale 30
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~1,759 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_registration ~142

One status check for a registration, by its content hash: pending (not yet sequenced; retry after the given seconds), awaiting_seal (sequenced, entry id known, receipt not yet sealed — sealing takes minutes, and never happens until delegate_sealing has run for the log), or sealed (the receipt is saved and its path returned). Any other answer from canopy is reported as a problem with its reason. canopy answers a statement it never received exactly like a pending one, so after ten minutes of pending this says so. Does not sleep; pace the retries yourself.

NameTypeReqDescription
contentHashstringyesthe content hash register_statement returned (64 lowercase hex)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

delegate_sealing ~343

Authorise the operator's sealer to publish checkpoints for your data log, signed with the log key. Without it entries sequence but are never sealed. If the coordinator has not learned the log's public root, this calls canopy's prepare with the same grant first. Run once per log; the delegation lasts until the returned expiresAt. With as: "authority" it does the same for your authority log, signed with the authority key, so the child grants you register there get sealed.

NameTypeReqDescription
asstring–which key owns the log: "log" (default) for your data log, under the grant you register statements with; "authority" for your authority log, under its creation grant (FORESTRIE_AUTHORITY_GRANT), so t…
baseUrlstring–the canopy SCRAPI base URL; falls back to FORESTRIE_BASE_URL — never defaulted by the package itself
coordinatorUrlstring–the delegation coordinator base URL; falls back to FORESTRIE_COORDINATOR_URL
grantstring–the Forestrie-Grant: base64 (standard or URL-safe) of the completed grant, or a path to a file holding it as raw bytes or base64 text; falls back to FORESTRIE_GRANT
knownSealerKeystring–the registrar's voucher key, base64 of 64 bytes x‖y, as the operator publishes it; falls back to FORESTRIE_KNOWN_SEALER_KEY
ttlSecondsinteger–how long the delegation lasts; defaults to the coordinator's suggestion

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_log_key ~177

Return the public half of one of this server's keys (ES256, 64 bytes x‖y, as hex, base64 and an SPKI PEM) and where it lives, creating it on first use. which: "log" (the default) is the key that owns your data log: a grant issuer names it in the grant's grantData, and a grant naming any other key cannot carry statements this server signs. which: "authority" is the requester's key that owns your authority log and signs the grants issue_grant makes. Never returns private key material.

NameTypeReqDescription
whichstring–which key: "log" (default), the key that owns your data log and signs statements; or "authority", the requester's key that owns an authority log and signs the child grants issue_grant makes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

issue_grant ~245

As the requester, sign a child grant with this server's authority key: a data-log creation grant under your authority log (named by your authority grant, FORESTRIE_AUTHORITY_GRANT), naming the performer's log key (by default this server's own) and sized with maxHeight, the batch ceiling canopy prices it by. Saves the grant under a fresh child log id; nothing is sent. Call register_grant next.

NameTypeReqDescription
granteestring–base64 of the 64-byte x‖y the grant names (the performer's log key); defaults to this server's own log key, for a self-purchase
logIdstring–the child data log to create; a fresh random UUID by default
maxHeightintegeryesthe grant's batch ceiling. canopy prices a payment-gated child grant as its unit price × maxHeight, so size it to the work it is for
parentGrantstring–your authority grant: the completed grant that created your authority log and names this server's authority key, as base64 or a file path; falls back to FORESTRIE_AUTHORITY_GRANT

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

register_grant ~366

Register a child grant with canopy (POST /register/{R}/grants, your authority grant as the parent) and follow it to its receipt; call it again with the same logId to resume until it reports complete. If canopy answers 402 and a payer is configured, it pays within the server's hard caps (per call, per UTC day, one network and asset, testnet only by default) and reports any cap that refuses. With no payer it returns the payment requirements: pay them from your own x402 wallet and call again with payment set to the X-PAYMENT value. Every payment for a grant carries a nonce derived from that grant, so retries and overlapping calls can never pay for it twice. When complete it returns the completed grant for delegate_sealing and register_statement.

NameTypeReqDescription
baseUrlstring–the canopy SCRAPI base URL; falls back to FORESTRIE_BASE_URL — never defaulted by the package itself
grantstring–a child grant signed elsewhere (base64 or a file path), instead of logId
logIdstring–the child log id issue_grant returned: register_grant resumes that grant from wherever the last call reached
parentGrantstring–your authority grant: the completed grant that created your authority log and names this server's authority key, as base64 or a file path; falls back to FORESTRIE_AUTHORITY_GRANT
paymentstring–relay mode: the X-PAYMENT header value your own x402 wallet produced for the payment requirements register_grant returned
rootLogIdstring–the forest's root log id (R in /register/{R}/grants); falls back to FORESTRIE_ROOT_LOG_ID

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

register_statement ~317

Sign a payload with the log key and register it under your Forestrie-Grant. Takes the payload bytes (inline base64 or a file path, up to canopy's 4 MiB statement limit) and its content type. The signed statement is saved before it is sent, so the returned content hash always names it, even if the request fails. A payload path may not point at the log key or inside this server's home. Registration is accepted, not yet sequenced: call check_registration next.

NameTypeReqDescription
baseUrlstring–the canopy SCRAPI base URL; falls back to FORESTRIE_BASE_URL — never defaulted by the package itself
contentTypestringyesthe payload's media type, e.g. application/json
grantstring–the Forestrie-Grant: base64 (standard or URL-safe) of the completed grant, or a path to a file holding it as raw bytes or base64 text; falls back to FORESTRIE_GRANT
issuerstring–CWT iss; defaults to the hex of the key id
payload–yesthe payload to sign and register, up to 4 MiB — { b64 } | { base64 } | { path }
rootLogIdstring–the forest's root log id (R in /register/{R}/entries); falls back to FORESTRIE_ROOT_LOG_ID
subjectstring–CWT sub; defaults to sha-256:<hex of the payload>

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

verify_registration ~169

Verify a sealed registration's receipt over the statement you registered, with @forestrie/mcp-verify's verifier, and return its four-question answers unaltered. By default the trust root is this server's own log key, the root of your data log; verifying never creates a key. Pass a known accumulator (from @forestrie/mcp-resolve's fetch_accumulator) to use a root that can also answer split-view.

NameTypeReqDescription
contentHashstringyesthe content hash register_statement returned (64 lowercase hex)
knownAccumulator––optional: a known accumulator (e.g. from @forestrie/mcp-resolve's fetch_accumulator) to verify against instead of this server's own log key — { b64 } | { base64 } | { path }

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log MCP server?

Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @forestrie/mcp-register. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @forestrie/mcp-register

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add dev-forestrie-register -- npx -y @forestrie/mcp-register
Common questions

What is the Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log MCP server?

Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.forestrie/register. Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log, verify receipts, buy grants via x402 within caps. This page covers its npm package (@forestrie/mcp-register).

Is the Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log MCP server safe to use?

Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 6 known advisories against it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log MCP server expose?

Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log exposes 7 tools: get_log_key, register_statement, check_registration, verify_registration, delegate_sealing, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,759 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log MCP server still maintained?

Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log MCP server under?

Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 16 checks on Sign and register statements on a Forestrie log, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 12 more. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an npm package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.