Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Aether: Base onchain data & token risk (x402)

REMOTE · AETHER-X402.VERCEL.APP

Base token risk (honeypot sim), prices, balances, Basenames, tx data. Pay-per-call in USDC via x402.

+1 this week 84 Trust /100

Last scanned (12 hours ago)

Scores higher than 89% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Crypto and Web3

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability67
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 1993 tokens (~86/item across 23 items; 23 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage73
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 18% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 23 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 23 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 17 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://aether-x402.vercel.app/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.vercel.app CN=WR1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 31 Oct 2026 29 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 9c5f0e6a35c955e113044c86848e4cd5
SANs: *.vercel.app
CN=WR1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 7fd9e2c2d2048a0474b627a26d0868a7
CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 19 Jun 2020 28 Jan 2028 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of aether-x402.vercel.app. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
app. present 23684 8 Verified
vercel.app. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
x-content-type-options nosniff

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://aether-x402.vercel.app/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://aether-x402.vercel.app/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://aether-x402.vercel.app/mcp
MCP tools · 23 exposed · ~1,993 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
audit_evidence ~101

Does this write-up back up what it claims? Send up to 40,000 characters of text; get the claims that cite no evidence, contradictions, missing evidence and documentation gaps, with fixes. Deterministic rules, no AI. Rejects text containing secrets. A documentation review, not legal or financial advice. Price: $0.01 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
requeststring––
textstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

audit_x402_payability ~195

x402 endpoint audit: can a paying agent actually pay this API? Probes any x402 URL and validates its 402 payment requirements (CAIP-2 network, USDC asset, payTo checksum, amount, EIP-712 domain, resource URL, Bazaar discovery). Returns pass, warn or fail, a 0-100 score and a fix for every failure. Price: $0.01 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
body––Example JSON body the endpoint accepts
expectobject–What the paying caller needs: fails the audit if the endpoint cannot be paid this way
headersobject–Non-credential headers the endpoint needs before its paywall (e.g. Idempotency-Key)
method––Defaults to POST when body is supplied, otherwise GET
urlstringyesPublic https URL of the paid x402 endpoint to audit

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_allowance ~93

ERC-20 allowance check on Base: how much a spender is still approved to move from an owner's token balance, and whether the approval is unlimited. Run before a swap, an approve or a revoke. Input: token, owner, spender. Price: $0.002 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
ownerstringyes–
spenderstringyes–
tokenstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_balance ~52

Wallet balance on Base: the native ETH balance of any address, read live from the chain. Input: address. Price: $0.001 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
addressstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_basename ~60

Basename lookup: resolve a Base name such as jesse.base.eth to its wallet address, with avatar and profile text records. Input: name. Price: $0.01 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
namestringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_block ~52

Base block lookup by number or tag (latest, safe, finalized): timestamp, gas and transaction count. Price: $0.01 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
blockstring|integer––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_call ~89

Simulate a read-only contract call on Base (eth_call) without sending a transaction: returns the raw result or the revert reason. Use it to dry-run a call before signing. Price: $0.01 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
datastringyes–
fromstring––
tostringyes–
valuestring|integer––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_contract ~70

What is this Base address? Wallet (EOA) or smart contract, code size, proxy implementation address, and whether it is an ERC-20, ERC-721 or ERC-1155 token. Price: $0.01 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
addressstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_erc20_balance ~71

ERC-20 token balance of a wallet on Base (USDC or any other token), formatted with symbol and decimals. Input: wallet address and token address. Price: $0.002 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
addressstringyes–
tokenstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_estimate_gas ~85

Estimate the gas and the cost in ETH and USD of a Base transaction before signing it. Input: to, and optionally from, data and value. Price: $0.002 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
datastring––
fromstringyes–
tostringyes–
valuestring|integer––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_gas ~50

Current gas price on Base in gwei: base fee, suggested priority fee and max fee per gas, read live from the chain. Price: $0.01 USDC on Base via x402.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_nft_metadata ~85

NFT metadata on Base for an ERC-721 or ERC-1155 token: token URI plus the name, image and attributes it points to, resolved from IPFS, Arweave, data URIs or https. Price: $0.005 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
contractstringyes–
tokenIdstring|integeryes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_nft_owner ~66

Who owns this NFT? Current owner of an ERC-721 token on Base by contract address and token id (ownerOf). Price: $0.01 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
contractstringyes–
tokenIdstring|integeryes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_portfolio ~77

Wallet portfolio value on Base: ETH plus major tokens (or up to 20 tokens you choose), each holding priced in USD from live DEX prices, with the total. Input: wallet address. Price: $0.004 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
addressstringyes–
tokensarray––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_price ~70

Token price on Base by contract address: live USD price and pool liquidity from Uniswap v2/v3 and Aerodrome. Works for any token with a DEX pool, including newly launched ones. Price: $0.003 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
tokenstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_receipt ~59

Base transaction receipt by hash: success or reverted, gas used, and the decoded ERC-20 Transfer events showing which tokens moved between which addresses. Price: $0.003 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
hashstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_token ~51

Token info for any ERC-20 on Base by contract address: name, symbol, decimals and total supply. Price: $0.01 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
tokenstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_token_risk ~173

Is this Base token safe to buy, or a honeypot, rug pull or scam? Simulates a real buy and sell to prove the token can be sold and to measure buy and sell tax, then checks mint, blacklist, pause and fee powers, proxy upgradeability, owner and DEX liquidity. Input: token address. Returns a verdict (low, caution, high, avoid), a 0-100 risk score and the evidence. Check before an agent trades a token. Try it free first: 3 calls a day at POST /v1/base/token/risk/trial. Price: $0.01 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
simulateboolean–Run the buy/sell simulation (default true)
tokenstringyesBase ERC-20 contract address

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_token_risk_trial ~128

FREE trial, no wallet or payment needed: is this Base token safe to buy, or a honeypot, rug pull or scam? The same verdict as base_token_risk (real buy and sell simulation, tax, mint, blacklist and pause powers, owner, liquidity), limited to 3 calls per caller per day. Input: token address. After the trial, use base_token_risk ($0.01 via x402)

NameTypeReqDescription
simulateboolean–Run the buy/sell simulation (default true)
tokenstringyesBase ERC-20 contract address

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_transfers ~82

Recent ERC-20 transfers on Base for a token, a wallet, or both: who sent how much to whom, across up to 2,000 recent blocks (100 results max). Price: $0.01 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
addressstring––
blocksinteger––
tokenstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

base_tx ~53

Base transaction lookup by hash: sender, recipient, value, function selector, block, and whether it succeeded or reverted. Price: $0.01 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
hashstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

score_opportunity ~121

How strong is this startup or deal on paper? Scores an opportunity across seven pillars weighted by stage (pre-seed to series B+), applies red flags, and returns a 0 to 10 score with pass, investigate or fail. Deterministic: the same input always gives the same score. A screening aid, not investment advice. Price: $0.01 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
opportunityNamestringyes–
pillarsarray––
redFlagIndicesarray––
stage–––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

triage_invoice ~110

Which overdue invoice should be chased, and what is the next step? Send an invoice number, client reference, amount and days overdue; get its aging category and the next action to take. Deterministic rules, no AI: the same input always gives the same answer. Price: $0.01 USDC on Base via x402.

NameTypeReqDescription
amountnumberyes–
clientReferencestringyes–
daysOverdueintegeryes–
invoiceNumberstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Aether: Base onchain data & token risk (x402) MCP server?

Aether: Base onchain data & token risk (x402) is a hosted endpoint at https://aether-x402.vercel.app/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · aether-x402.vercel.app

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http francosmit94-web-aether 'https://aether-x402.vercel.app/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Aether: Base onchain data & token risk (x402) MCP server?

Aether: Base onchain data & token risk (x402) is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.francosmit94-web/aether. Base token risk (honeypot sim), prices, balances, Basenames, tx data. Pay-per-call in USDC via x402. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://aether-x402.vercel.app/mcp).

Is the Aether: Base onchain data & token risk (x402) MCP server safe to use?

Aether: Base onchain data & token risk (x402) scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Aether: Base onchain data & token risk (x402) MCP server expose?

Aether: Base onchain data & token risk (x402) exposes 23 tools: base_token_risk_trial, base_token_risk, base_balance, base_erc20_balance, base_portfolio, and 18 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,993 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Aether: Base onchain data & token risk (x402) MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Aether: Base onchain data & token risk (x402) without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Aether: Base onchain data & token risk (x402) MCP server still maintained?

Aether: Base onchain data & token risk (x402) is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.