Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

16暗影心理测评

REMOTE · DEVELOPERS.SHADES16.COM

Chinese psychological assessments with guided questions, scoring, PDF reports, and user profiles.

+4 this week 84 Trust /100

Last scanned (43 minutes ago)

Scores higher than 89% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Health and Science

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security92
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 1270 tokens (~105/item across 12 items; 12 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management57
  • Stability observed for 17 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage89
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 67% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 12 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 13 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1
    • “score_assessment” reworded the description of “answers” cosmetic

    1 cosmetic change on this day. Switch on “Show cosmetic changes” to see it.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://developers.shades16.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=developers.shades16.com CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 13 Oct 2026 11 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 51f27717c30347a3491b8abea26ddb3abf5
SANs: developers.shades16.com
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of developers.shades16.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
shades16.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Enforced and verified

The endpoint asked for a token and published valid RFC 9728 metadata describing how to get one.

Result Enforced and verified
Enforced On tool calls
HTTP status 200

WWW-Authenticate challenge Bearer resource_metadata="https://developers.shades16.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp"

Bearer resource_metadata="https://developers.shades16.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp"
Header Value
x-content-type-options nosniff
referrer-policy no-referrer

Protected resource metadata

Document https://developers.shades16.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp
Retrieved Yes
Resource https://developers.shades16.com/mcp
Authorisation server https://developers.shades16.com

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://developers.shades16.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://developers.shades16.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://developers.shades16.com/mcp
MCP tools · 12 exposed · ~1,083 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
assessment_step ~204

免登录获取下一题、记录本次回答或按题本规则跳题。返回的state由对话端保留,服务端不保存答案。

NameTypeReqDescription
actionstringyes–
answerobject–answer操作需要itemId和value;skip操作只需itemId。
attemptIdstring–本次作答的固定编号。批量计分必填;重试沿用同一编号,保证同分结果一致。
releaseIdstringyesget_assessment返回的精确题包版本;答题及重试始终使用同一版本。
seedstring–16暗影抽题种子,可选;重试start时沿用相同种子。
stateobject–上一步返回的完整状态,保存在AI宿主,继续时原样传回。
testIdstringyes测评标识。

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

create_assessment_link ~121

创建带16暗影品牌的临时网页入口。已在聊天完成计分时,传score_assessment返回的record,打开直接查看该结果;不传record则进入答题。网页下载PDF或保存时普通登录,PDF不自动保存。固定Key平台可用此入口交接刚完成的结果。

NameTypeReqDescription
recordobject–score_assessment返回的完整record,原样传回。
testIdstringyes测评标识,如 mbti-four-preferences 或 shadow16

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_assessment ~92

免登录获取原题包与答题规格。在聊天中使用assessment_step逐题作答,再由score_assessment按原算法计分。

NameTypeReqDescription
releaseIdstring–从题包或答题状态取得的原版本标识;同次答题保持不变。
testIdstringyes测评标识,如 mbti-four-preferences 或 shadow16

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_example_result ~47

读取标明为示例的完成结果,用于接入体验。

NameTypeReqDescription
testIdstringyes测评标识,如 mbti-four-preferences 或 shadow16

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_profile_example ~50

免登录读取模拟人物的综合分析,体验不同特点和状态下的建议。

NameTypeReqDescription
caseIdstring––
detailstring––
scenariostring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_profile_schema ~29

免登录查看用户综合分析的领域、使用场景、算法版本及Skill入口。

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_report_pdf ~85

用户登录授权后,为刚完成的record或已保存结果生成PDF。不自动保存结果。example仅用于接入示例。

NameTypeReqDescription
exampleboolean––
recordobject–score_assessment返回的完整record,原样传回。
testIdstringyes测评标识,如 mbti-four-preferences 或 shadow16

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_results ~33

用户登录授权后,读取其已保存的完成结果、来源和版本。

NameTypeReqDescription
testIdsarray––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_user_profile ~64

综合用户已授权的多套评测,获得整个人的特点、组合判断、场景建议及追问。

NameTypeReqDescription
detailstring––
domainsarray––
scenariostring––
testIdsarray––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_assessments ~28

免登录查看16暗影当前可玩的测评、题量和版本。

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

save_completed_result ~93

用户登录并授权后,将完成摘要保存到同一16暗影账号。保留刚才的record,登录后继续保存,无需重新答题。

NameTypeReqDescription
expectedRevisionstring|nullyes–
recordobjectyesscore_assessment返回的完整record,原样传回。
testIdstringyes测评标识,如 mbti-four-preferences 或 shadow16

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

score_assessment ~237

免登录按指定题本的原算法计算结果并返回报告。计分不保存账号结果;用户选择保存或下载PDF时再登录授权。

NameTypeReqDescription
answersarray–经典测评的原始答案数组,每条包含题目编号itemId和原选项值value。也可传assessment_step返回的state。
attemptIdstringyes本次作答的固定编号。批量计分必填;重试沿用同一编号,保证同分结果一致。
completedAtintegeryes固定完成时间,Unix毫秒;重试沿用同一值。
releaseIdstringyesget_assessment返回的精确题包版本;答题及重试始终使用同一版本。
stagestring–16暗影首8题结果用basic,48题完整结果用full;经典测评使用full。
stateobject–assessment_step返回的完整状态,16暗影本人测评必填。
testIdstringyes测评标识。

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the 16暗影心理测评 MCP server?

16暗影心理测评 is a hosted endpoint at https://developers.shades16.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · developers.shades16.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-shades16-assessments 'https://developers.shades16.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the 16暗影心理测评 MCP server?

16暗影心理测评 is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.shades16/assessments. Chinese psychological assessments with guided questions, scoring, PDF reports, and user profiles. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://developers.shades16.com/mcp).

Is the 16暗影心理测评 MCP server safe to use?

16暗影心理测评 scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the 16暗影心理测评 MCP server expose?

16暗影心理测评 exposes 12 tools: list_assessments, get_assessment, assessment_step, score_assessment, create_assessment_link, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,083 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the 16暗影心理测评 MCP server require authentication?

Yes. 16暗影心理测评 asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.

Is the 16暗影心理测评 MCP server still maintained?

16暗影心理测评 is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.