16暗影心理测评
REMOTE · DEVELOPERS.SHADES16.COM
Chinese psychological assessments with guided questions, scoring, PDF reports, and user profiles.
Available components
Last scanned (43 minutes ago)
Scores higher than 89% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Health and Science
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security92
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation is enforced on tool calls, advertised via RFC 9728 protected-resource metadata. Discovery is public, which costs nothing: no tool can be invoked without a token. View diagnostics → Pass
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- The authorisation server supports Client ID Metadata Documents, the current MCP client-registration mechanism. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 1270 tokens (~105/item across 12 items; 12 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management57
- Stability observed for 17 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage89
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 67% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 12 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 13 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
- “score_assessment” reworded the description of “answers” cosmetic
1 cosmetic change on this day. Switch on “Show cosmetic changes” to see it.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://developers.shades16.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=developers.shades16.com | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 13 Oct 2026 | 11 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 51f27717c30347a3491b8abea26ddb3abf5 |
| SANs: developers.shades16.com | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of developers.shades16.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| shades16.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication Enforced and verified
The endpoint asked for a token and published valid RFC 9728 metadata describing how to get one.
| Result | Enforced and verified |
|---|---|
| Enforced | On tool calls |
| HTTP status | 200 |
WWW-Authenticate challenge Bearer resource_metadata="https://developers.shades16.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp"
Bearer resource_metadata="https://developers.shades16.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp" | Header | Value |
|---|---|
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
Protected resource metadata
| Document | https://developers.shades16.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp |
|---|---|
| Retrieved | Yes |
| Resource | https://developers.shades16.com/mcp |
| Authorisation server | https://developers.shades16.com |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://developers.shades16.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://developers.shades16.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://developers.shades16.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
assessment_step 继续答题 ~204
免登录获取下一题、记录本次回答或按题本规则跳题。返回的state由对话端保留,服务端不保存答案。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | – |
| answer | object | – | answer操作需要itemId和value;skip操作只需itemId。 |
| attemptId | string | – | 本次作答的固定编号。批量计分必填;重试沿用同一编号,保证同分结果一致。 |
| releaseId | string | yes | get_assessment返回的精确题包版本;答题及重试始终使用同一版本。 |
| seed | string | – | 16暗影抽题种子,可选;重试start时沿用相同种子。 |
| state | object | – | 上一步返回的完整状态,保存在AI宿主,继续时原样传回。 |
| testId | string | yes | 测评标识。 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
create_assessment_link 创建网页答题或结果入口 ~121
创建带16暗影品牌的临时网页入口。已在聊天完成计分时,传score_assessment返回的record,打开直接查看该结果;不传record则进入答题。网页下载PDF或保存时普通登录,PDF不自动保存。固定Key平台可用此入口交接刚完成的结果。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| record | object | – | score_assessment返回的完整record,原样传回。 |
| testId | string | yes | 测评标识,如 mbti-four-preferences 或 shadow16 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_assessment 获取测评题目 ~92
免登录获取原题包与答题规格。在聊天中使用assessment_step逐题作答,再由score_assessment按原算法计分。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| releaseId | string | – | 从题包或答题状态取得的原版本标识;同次答题保持不变。 |
| testId | string | yes | 测评标识,如 mbti-four-preferences 或 shadow16 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_example_result 查看示例结果 ~47
读取标明为示例的完成结果,用于接入体验。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| testId | string | yes | 测评标识,如 mbti-four-preferences 或 shadow16 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_profile_example 查看个性化建议示例 ~50
免登录读取模拟人物的综合分析,体验不同特点和状态下的建议。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| caseId | string | – | – |
| detail | string | – | – |
| scenario | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_profile_schema 查看综合分析结构 ~29
免登录查看用户综合分析的领域、使用场景、算法版本及Skill入口。
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_report_pdf 下载PDF报告 ~85
用户登录授权后,为刚完成的record或已保存结果生成PDF。不自动保存结果。example仅用于接入示例。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| example | boolean | – | – |
| record | object | – | score_assessment返回的完整record,原样传回。 |
| testId | string | yes | 测评标识,如 mbti-four-preferences 或 shadow16 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_results 读取已保存结果 ~33
用户登录授权后,读取其已保存的完成结果、来源和版本。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| testIds | array | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_user_profile 获取个性化建议 ~64
综合用户已授权的多套评测,获得整个人的特点、组合判断、场景建议及追问。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| detail | string | – | – |
| domains | array | – | – |
| scenario | string | – | – |
| testIds | array | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_assessments 查看测评目录 ~28
免登录查看16暗影当前可玩的测评、题量和版本。
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
save_completed_result 保存完成结果 ~93
用户登录并授权后,将完成摘要保存到同一16暗影账号。保留刚才的record,登录后继续保存,无需重新答题。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| expectedRevision | string|null | yes | – |
| record | object | yes | score_assessment返回的完整record,原样传回。 |
| testId | string | yes | 测评标识,如 mbti-four-preferences 或 shadow16 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
score_assessment 计算测评结果 ~237
免登录按指定题本的原算法计算结果并返回报告。计分不保存账号结果;用户选择保存或下载PDF时再登录授权。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| answers | array | – | 经典测评的原始答案数组,每条包含题目编号itemId和原选项值value。也可传assessment_step返回的state。 |
| attemptId | string | yes | 本次作答的固定编号。批量计分必填;重试沿用同一编号,保证同分结果一致。 |
| completedAt | integer | yes | 固定完成时间,Unix毫秒;重试沿用同一值。 |
| releaseId | string | yes | get_assessment返回的精确题包版本;答题及重试始终使用同一版本。 |
| stage | string | – | 16暗影首8题结果用basic,48题完整结果用full;经典测评使用full。 |
| state | object | – | assessment_step返回的完整状态,16暗影本人测评必填。 |
| testId | string | yes | 测评标识。 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the 16暗影心理测评 MCP server?
16暗影心理测评 is a hosted endpoint at https://developers.shades16.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · developers.shades16.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-shades16-assessments 'https://developers.shades16.com/mcp'
What is the 16暗影心理测评 MCP server?
16暗影心理测评 is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.shades16/assessments. Chinese psychological assessments with guided questions, scoring, PDF reports, and user profiles. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://developers.shades16.com/mcp).
Is the 16暗影心理测评 MCP server safe to use?
16暗影心理测评 scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the 16暗影心理测评 MCP server expose?
16暗影心理测评 exposes 12 tools: list_assessments, get_assessment, assessment_step, score_assessment, create_assessment_link, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,083 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the 16暗影心理测评 MCP server require authentication?
Yes. 16暗影心理测评 asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.
Is the 16暗影心理测评 MCP server still maintained?
16暗影心理测评 is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.