Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Workers' Rights

REMOTE · WWW.WORKERS-RIGHTS.COM · SCANNED SEP 21

Read-only employment-law research: 140K+ rulings, employer track records, rights & EEOC guides.

0 this week 84 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2210 tokens (~245/item across 9 items; 9 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 9 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 10 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Install

How do I install the Workers' Rights MCP server?

Workers' Rights is a hosted endpoint at https://www.workers-rights.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · www.workers-rights.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-workers-rights-employment-law 'https://www.workers-rights.com/api/mcp'
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-workers-rights-employment-law": {
      "url": "https://www.workers-rights.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "com-workers-rights-employment-law": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://www.workers-rights.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.com-workers-rights-employment-law]
url = "https://www.workers-rights.com/api/mcp"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "com-workers-rights-employment-law": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://www.workers-rights.com/api/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add com-workers-rights-employment-law --url 'https://www.workers-rights.com/api/mcp' --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  com-workers-rights-employment-law:
    url: "https://www.workers-rights.com/api/mcp"
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "com-workers-rights-employment-law": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://www.workers-rights.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add com-workers-rights-employment-law -t streamable-http -u 'https://www.workers-rights.com/api/mcp'
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-workers-rights-employment-law": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://www.workers-rights.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 6 Sept 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “search_rulings” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • “explain_my_rights” added an optional parameter “employer_sector” cosmetic
  • 30 Aug 26 0
    • “find_employment_attorney” reworded the description of “contingency_fee” cosmetic
    • “find_employment_attorney” reworded the description of “free_consultation” cosmetic
    • “find_employment_attorney” reworded the description of “language” cosmetic
    • “find_employment_attorney” reworded the description of “min_rating” cosmetic

    4 cosmetic changes on this day. Switch on “Show cosmetic changes” to see them.

  • 26 Aug 26 +1
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Aug 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 21 Aug 26 0
    • Tool “get_attorney_track_record” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “get_employer_track_record” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “search_rulings” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • “get_employer_track_record” reworded the description of “limit” cosmetic
  • 17 Aug 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “find_employment_attorney” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “get_corpus_stats” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Server version: 0.1.0 → 1.0.0 functional
  • 11 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 2 Aug 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “find_employment_attorney” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “get_attorney_track_record” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “search_rulings” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • “find_employment_attorney” reworded the description of “contingency_fee” cosmetic
    • “find_employment_attorney” reworded the description of “free_consultation” cosmetic
    • “find_employment_attorney” reworded the description of “language” cosmetic
    • “find_employment_attorney” reworded the description of “min_rating” cosmetic
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 21 Sept 2026 · Probed https://www.workers-rights.com/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=www.workers-rights.com CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 30 Aug 2026 28 Nov 2026 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 6d9ddf662e2d11d6305466b549e900ee379
SANs: www.workers-rights.com
CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of www.workers-rights.com. Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
workers-rights.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'; form-action 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'wasm-unsafe-eval' https://maps.googleapis.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://vercel.live; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: blob: https://maps.googleapis.com https://maps.gstatic.com https://*.googleapis.com https://*.googleusercontent.com https://*.supabase.co https://www.google-analytics.com https://www.googletagmanager.com; connect-src 'self' https://api.anthropic.com https://*.supabase.co https://maps.googleapis.com https://accounts.google.com https://www.google.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://*.analytics.google.com https://www.googletagmanager.com; worker-src 'self' blob:; frame-src 'self' https://accounts.google.com https://login.microsoftonline.com; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(self)

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://www.workers-rights.com/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://www.workers-rights.com/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://www.workers-rights.com/api/mcp
MCP tools · 9 exposed · ~2,135 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
explain_my_rights ~279

Explain which federal (and state, if a state is given) employment laws may protect a worker based on the type of issue (e.g. discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination) and/or the protected class involved (e.g. race, sex, age, disability, pregnancy). Returns the relevant statutes with citations, who they cover (employer-size thresholds), filing deadlines and agencies, and available remedies. Use this to ground an answer about a worker’s legal protections. Deadline guidance covers private-sector and state/local government workers; federal employees follow a separate process with a much shorter deadline (45 days to contact their agency's EEO counselor). Educational information, not legal advice.

NameTypeReqDescription
employer_sectorstringWhether the employer is private, state/local government, or a federal agency.
issuestringType of workplace issue, e.g. "discrimination", "harassment", "retaliation", "wrongful termination", "unpaid wages", "disability accommodation".
protected_classstringProtected characteristic involved, e.g. "race", "sex", "age", "disability", "religion", "national origin", "pregnancy".
statestringUS state (2-letter code or full name) to include state-specific protections and the correct EEOC filing deadline.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_employment_attorney ~399

Find public-source employment-law attorney listings near a US location. Returns source-attributed identity, firm, location, and contact data sorted by proximity. Person-specific filters and fields apply only where the underlying directory supports them; Google Places metrics are labeled as firm/office listing data, never individual ratings. Listings are not state-bar verification or an endorsement.

NameTypeReqDescription
citystringOptional city to tighten the search center (e.g. "Tampa").
contingency_feebooleanFilter on attorney-supplied fee data. Most listings are public office records that do not publish it; when none in range do, the tool returns total 0 with unsupported_filters rather than implying no…
free_consultationbooleanFilter on attorney-supplied fee data. Most listings are public office records that do not publish it; when none in range do, the tool returns total 0 with unsupported_filters rather than implying no…
languagestringFilter on attorney-supplied language data. Most listings are public office records that do not publish it; when none in range do, the tool returns total 0 with unsupported_filters rather than silentl…
latnumberOptional precise latitude. Overrides city/state when paired with lng.
limitintegerMax attorneys to return (1–25).
lngnumberOptional precise longitude. Overrides city/state when paired with lat.
min_ratingnumberMinimum individual-profile rating. Office/business ratings are never treated as an attorney rating, so this matches only hand-managed profiles and returns nothing where none exist.
radius_milesintegerSearch radius. Defaults to 100mi for broad statewide coverage.
statestringUS state — 2-letter code or full name (e.g. "FL" or "Florida"). Required unless lat/lng given.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_similar_cases ~280

Given the facts of an employment situation — claim types, protected class, employer, state — analyze how similar real cases in the corpus were decided. Returns the aggregate plaintiff (employee) win rate, settlement rate, typical damages range, the factors that most helped employees win vs. lose, and a few representative example cases. This is the highest-value grounding tool for 'what are my chances / what matters' questions. Educational statistics, not a prediction or legal advice.

NameTypeReqDescription
claim_typesarrayClaim types alleged, snake_case, e.g. ["retaliation","wrongful_termination","discrimination","harassment"]. The single highest-value signal.
employer_namestringEmployer / defendant name, e.g. "Union Pacific Railroad". Used for a fuzzy match.
industrystringEmployer industry, e.g. "healthcare", "retail", "transportation".
law_idsarrayRelated law ids, e.g. ["title-vii","adea","ada","fmla","flsa"].
protected_classesarrayProtected classes at issue, e.g. ["sex","race","age","disability","pregnancy","national_origin"].
statestringTwo-letter US state code the situation arose in, e.g. "FL", "CA".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_attorney_track_record ~172

Given an employment attorney name (or profile slug), return the federal employment-law cases on file in which that attorney appeared — case caption, court, year, nature-of-suit, and the side they appeared for when on record. Use this when a user names an attorney and wants their public litigation history. Facts only, sourced from federal court dockets. Attorney identities are algorithmically matched; ambiguous and lower-confidence matches are excluded. One case is one normalized court+docket number, so duplicate source rows do not inflate the count.

NameTypeReqDescription
attorneystringyesEmployment attorney full name (e.g. "Jane Doe") or their workers-rights.com profile slug.
limitintegerNumber of example cases to return (1–25). Counts reflect all cases on file, not just these.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_corpus_stats ~88

Return live statistics about the Workers' Rights corpus: total number of court rulings in the research corpus, number of public attorney listings, number of monitored legal data sources, the date the corpus was last updated, and the distribution of case outcomes across the analyzed rulings. Use this to establish scale/credibility or to answer 'how much data do you have / how current is it'.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_eeoc_process ~196

Plain-English guide to the 9 stages of an EEOC discrimination/retaliation charge, from pre-filing through resolution. Call with no arguments for an overview of all stages with typical durations; call with a stage number (1-9) for a deep-dive on that stage: what to expect, how long it takes, the key tip, and do/don't guidance. Use this whenever someone asks what happens after filing with the EEOC, how long the process takes, what a position statement or rebuttal is, or what to do at the stage they are currently in. Covers private-sector and state/local government workers; federal employees follow a separate EEO process with a much shorter deadline (45 days to contact their agency's EEO counselor).

NameTypeReqDescription
stageintegerStage number 1-9 for a deep-dive on one stage. Omit for an overview of all nine stages.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_employer_track_record ~162

Given an employer/company name, return distinct federal cases and trusted published opinions that involve that employer, the breakdown of outcomes (employee wins, employer wins, settlements, dismissals), the most notable recent opinions, AND the count of federal docket records on file (cases that may not have a written opinion). Use this when a user names their employer and wants that company's litigation history + footprint.

NameTypeReqDescription
employerstringyesEmployer/company name to look up, e.g. "Walmart", "Acme Corporation". Common suffixes like Inc/Corp/LLC are ignored when matching.
limitintegerNumber of example published opinions to return (1–25). The total count and outcome breakdown reflect the full corpus, not just these examples.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_evidence_preservation_checklist ~200

Concrete checklist for a worker who senses termination coming or is in a deteriorating work situation: what to save (emails, chat DMs, performance reviews, HR records, pay records), in what order, and how to do it without crossing lines — preserving your own employment record is legal; taking company IP is not. Use this whenever someone says they think they are about to be fired, fears retaliation is escalating, mentions a PIP or sudden access changes, or asks what to do before reporting discrimination. Sections: 'today' (highest-leverage, minutes matter), 'this-week', 'quiet' (low-priority prep). Time-sensitive — employers often revoke system access during the termination call itself.

NameTypeReqDescription
groupstringChecklist section for a focused list: 'today' (highest-leverage, do first), 'this-week', or 'quiet' (lower-priority quiet prep). Omit for the full checklist.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_rulings ~359

Search published employment-law rulings from our research corpus by keyword, law, court, federal circuit, state, outcome, and date. Returns published opinions with citations, outcomes, procedural stage, employers, claim types, damages, and links to the full opinion. Use this to ground any claim about how employment cases have been decided. Results are quality-filtered (low-confidence and junk rows excluded).

NameTypeReqDescription
circuitstringFilter to a federal appeals circuit (the appeals court plus its district courts). Preferred values: first-circuit, second-circuit, third-circuit, fourth-circuit, fifth-circuit, sixth-circuit, seventh…
courtstringFilter by CourtListener court id, e.g. "scotus", "ca11" (11th Circuit).
date_fromstringEarliest filing date (YYYY-MM-DD).
date_tostringLatest filing date (YYYY-MM-DD).
lawstringFilter by a related law id, e.g. "title-vii", "adea", "ada", "fmla", "flsa".
limitintegerMax rulings to return (1–25).
outcomestringFilter to a specific case outcome.
querystringFree-text search across case name and opinion snippet (e.g. "pregnancy discrimination retaliation").
statestringTwo-letter US state code the case was filed in, e.g. "FL", "CA".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the Workers' Rights MCP server?

Workers' Rights is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.workers-rights/employment-law. Read-only employment-law research: 140K+ rulings, employer track records, rights & EEOC guides. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.workers-rights.com/api/mcp).

Is the Workers' Rights MCP server safe to use?

Workers' Rights scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Workers' Rights MCP server expose?

Workers' Rights exposes 9 tools: search_rulings, find_similar_cases, get_employer_track_record, get_attorney_track_record, explain_my_rights, and 4 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 2,135 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Workers' Rights MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Workers' Rights without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Workers' Rights MCP server still maintained?

Workers' Rights is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 21 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.