Paramount Loan Services — Mortgage Loan Application
REMOTE · PARAMOUNTLS.COM
File a Fannie Mae Form 1003 mortgage application with a licensed California broker. No API key.
Available components
Last scanned (13 hours ago)
Scores higher than 89% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability72
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 570 tokens (~142/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage86
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 57% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 31 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://paramountls.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=paramountls.com | CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 24 Sept 2026 | 23 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 513bddafa4851f44b43a58e8c091f7dcb52 |
| SANs: paramountls.com, www.paramountls.com | ||||||
| CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of paramountls.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | DS published | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| paramountls.com. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://paramountls.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://paramountls.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://paramountls.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_company_information About Paramount Loan Services ~24
Return licensing, contact, service area and language details for Paramount Loan Services.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_loan_application_schema Get the 1003 schema ~38
Return the full JSON Schema for a loan application, so you can see every field the 1003 accepts and which ones are required.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_loan_programs List loan programs ~35
Return the loan programs Paramount brokers, with the enum value to put in loan.program and a one-line description of each.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
submit_loan_application Submit a loan application (Form 1003) ~317
File a Uniform Residential Loan Application (Fannie Mae Form 1003 / URLA) with Paramount Loan Services on behalf of a borrower who has consented. Returns an application id. A licensed loan officer then contacts the borrower. This is not a rate quote, a pre-approval or a credit decision.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| _comment | string | – | Free-text note to a human reader. Ignored, never stored, never emailed. The example uses it to say it is fictional. |
| acknowledgments | object | yes | – |
| assets | object | – | – |
| borrowers | array | yes | – |
| dry_run | boolean | – | Set true to validate and preview this application without filing it. Nothing is emailed and no application id is issued. Use it to check a body before committing, and to test this API at all. |
| gifts_or_grants | array | – | Section 4d. |
| liabilities | object | – | – |
| loan | object | yes | – |
| loan_originator | object | – | Section 9. Leave empty and Paramount assigns a licensed loan officer. |
| notes | string | – | Anything a loan officer should read first. Plain English. |
| other_new_mortgage_loans | array | – | Section 4b. Other new mortgage loans on the subject property. |
| property | object | yes | – |
| real_estate_owned | array | – | Section 3. Every property the borrower owns, including the one being refinanced. |
| submitted_by | object | yes | Identifies the agent or software sending the application. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Paramount Loan Services — Mortgage Loan Application MCP server?
Paramount Loan Services — Mortgage Loan Application is a hosted endpoint at https://paramountls.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · paramountls.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-paramountls-loan-application 'https://paramountls.com/mcp'
What is the Paramount Loan Services — Mortgage Loan Application MCP server?
Paramount Loan Services — Mortgage Loan Application is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.paramountls/loan-application. File a Fannie Mae Form 1003 mortgage application with a licensed California broker. No API key. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://paramountls.com/mcp).
Is the Paramount Loan Services — Mortgage Loan Application MCP server safe to use?
Paramount Loan Services — Mortgage Loan Application scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Paramount Loan Services — Mortgage Loan Application MCP server expose?
Paramount Loan Services — Mortgage Loan Application exposes 4 tools: submit_loan_application, get_loan_application_schema, list_loan_programs, get_company_information. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 414 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Paramount Loan Services — Mortgage Loan Application MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Paramount Loan Services — Mortgage Loan Application without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Paramount Loan Services — Mortgage Loan Application MCP server still maintained?
Paramount Loan Services — Mortgage Loan Application is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Paramount Loan Services — Mortgage Loan Application MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Paramount Loan Services — Mortgage Loan Application, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.