Kitfinch
REMOTE · KITFINCH.COM
Business software by trade for US small service businesses, with prices verified at the source.
Available components
Last scanned (3 hours ago)
Scores higher than 84% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category CRM and Sales
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability45
- 0% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Fail
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 263 tokens (~65/item across 4 items; 3 tools + 1 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management93
- Stability observed for 28 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
- Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://kitfinch.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=kitfinch.com | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 24 Sept 2026 | 23 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 602a64707c4be131bd47ed6633f5f3eec47 |
| SANs: *.kitfinch.com, kitfinch.com | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of kitfinch.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| kitfinch.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; object-src 'none' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), interest-cohort=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://kitfinch.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://kitfinch.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://kitfinch.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare Compare two tools ~71
Use this when the user wants to compare two business software tools side by side. Returns both tools with verified entry prices, the tasks they both cover and a link to Kitfinch's comparison page.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | string | yes | First tool name or slug |
| b | string | yes | Second tool name or slug |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| disclosure | string | yes | – |
| found | boolean | yes | – |
| kind | string | yes | – |
| missing | array | yes | – |
| query | object | yes | – |
| sharedTasks | array | yes | – |
| suggestions | array | yes | – |
| tools | array | yes | – |
| url | string|null | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_pricing Get verified pricing ~76
Use this when the user asks how much a specific business software tool costs. Returns every plan Kitfinch tracks; an amount is included only when it has a source page and a recent verification date, otherwise the plan says to check the vendor site.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| tool | string | yes | Tool name or slug, for example "Jobber" |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| disclosure | string | yes | – |
| found | boolean | yes | – |
| kind | string | yes | – |
| plans | array | yes | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
| suggestions | array | yes | – |
| tool | – | yes | – |
No examples provided.
recommend_kit Recommend a software kit ~109
Use this when a small US trade or service business (plumber, electrician, HVAC, landscaper…) asks which software to use. Returns Kitfinch's recommended tool for each task (scheduling, invoicing, CRM…), verified entry prices with their source, and an estimated monthly total for the team size.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| job | string | yes | The trade, for example "plumber" or "HVAC companies" |
| teamSize | integer | – | Number of users; defaults to 1 |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| disclosure | string | yes | – |
| found | boolean | yes | – |
| job | – | yes | – |
| jobs | array | yes | – |
| kind | string | yes | – |
| lines | array | yes | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
| teamSize | integer | yes | – |
| total | object | yes | – |
| url | string|null | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the Kitfinch MCP server?
Kitfinch is a hosted endpoint at https://kitfinch.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · kitfinch.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-kitfinch-mcp 'https://kitfinch.com/mcp'
What is the Kitfinch MCP server?
Kitfinch is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.kitfinch/mcp. Business software by trade for US small service businesses, with prices verified at the source. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://kitfinch.com/mcp).
Is the Kitfinch MCP server safe to use?
Kitfinch scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Kitfinch MCP server expose?
Kitfinch exposes 3 tools: recommend_kit, get_pricing, compare. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 256 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Kitfinch MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Kitfinch without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Kitfinch MCP server still maintained?
Kitfinch is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.