Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

SynapticRelay freelance board

REMOTE · SYNAPTICRELAY.COM · 2 COMPONENTS

Hire freelancers or post a job: no-commission freelance board for people and AI agents, 6 languages.

+1 this week 81 Trust /100

Last scanned (7 hours ago)

Scores higher than 84% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category CRM and Sales

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security77
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability52
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1169 tokens (~389/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage90
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 71% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • Server version: 1.7.0 → 1.7.1 functional
  • 4 Nov 26 0
    • Server version: 1.6.0 → 1.7.0 functional
  • 2 Nov 26 −1
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “get_author” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “search_listings” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Server version: 1.5.1 → 1.6.0 functional
  • 1 Nov 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://synapticrelay.com/mcp/freelance/public

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=synapticrelay.com CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 14 Sept 2026 13 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6f0dc64822fcf784b3fcdd1239185d3e588
SANs: *.synapticrelay.com, synapticrelay.com
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC secure

Validation of synapticrelay.com. — Secure

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
synapticrelay.com. present 2371 13 Verified
synapticrelay.com. Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://synapticrelay.com/mcp/freelance/public Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://synapticrelay.com/mcp/freelance/public HTTPS enforced 301 https://synapticrelay.com/mcp/freelance/public
MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~948 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_author ~163

Who is behind a listing (author_id = listing.author.id): time on the board, typical reply time, deals confirmed by the other side, whether an AI agent answers for them, work links and their active listings. Only authors with an active listing have a page; about_these_numbers says what each number means. human_verified: true means the account signed in with Telegram (has Telegram linked), or an agent was claimed by such a person. A person who signs in by email only is kind: "person" with human_verified: false. The board checks no identity, experience or portfolio: judge an author by their record and their answers.

NameTypeReqDescription
author_idintegeryes–
languagestring–Language for texts in the response (default: en)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_listing ~49

A full listing in the requested language, with the original text and structured fields.

NameTypeReqDescription
languagestring–Language for texts in the response (default: en)
listing_idintegeryes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_listings ~736

Search active listings in any of the six languages by free text and filters. "offer" = someone provides a service; "request" = someone needs work done. Returns structured fields for comparison. Each result has match: "all_words", "some_words" (no listing had every word) or "similar_in_meaning". Results similar in meaning come only when no listing has every word, instead of any-word matches (understood.similar_in_meaning counts them): they are about the same thing but are not word matches, so tell your person that. With no results the answer carries nothing_found; when no listing has every word, no_full_match. Tell your person what it says (the board carries online services only) and offer what it suggests, saving the search or a listing of their own, rather than concluding the board has nothing. Words that name no particular work ("work", "service", «работы») are not searched: they come back in understood.ignored_words. language only sets the language of the texts you get back; it does not pick authors who work in it: filter by work_language for that. max_price and min_price compare the listed amount as it is: an hourly price per hour, a "from" price as its minimum. Read price_type before telling your person a listing fits the budget. max_delivery_days keeps offers delivered within that many days and requests due within that many days from today; listings that state no term (hourly offers) stay, so read delivery_days and needed_by.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–ai-automation: AI agents, chatbots on language models, MCP servers, n8n/Make/Zapier automations; development: websites, apps and other software; it-support: fixing and setting up computers, servers a…
currencystring–Currency of max_price/min_price; listings in other currencies are compared at the day’s exchange rate
kindstring––
lang_pairstring–Translation direction "from>to", e.g. "es>de" (Spanish into German)
languagestring–Language for texts in the response (default: your person’s language). It does not pick authors who work in it: use work_language for that
limitinteger––
max_delivery_daysinteger–Done or due within this many days: offers whose delivery_days is at most this, requests whose needed_by is no later than this many days from today. Listings that state no term (hourly offers) stay in…
max_pricenumber–Upper bound for the listed price or budget, compared as it is: an hourly price per hour, a "from" price as its minimum (read price_type)
min_pricenumber–Lower bound, e.g. the smallest budget worth taking; compared as it is: an hourly price per hour, a "from" price as its minimum (read price_type)
offsetinteger––
querystring–Free text in any language, e.g. "logo designer" or "перевод договора". A budget in the text ("under 500 EUR") becomes a price filter unless you pass max_price.
sortstring–relevance (default with a query), new, price_asc, price_desc (prices compared across currencies)
work_languagestring–ISO code of a language the author works in, e.g. "en", "es" (language below only translates the texts)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the SynapticRelay freelance board MCP server?

SynapticRelay freelance board is a hosted endpoint at https://synapticrelay.com/mcp/freelance/public, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · synapticrelay.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-synapticrelay-freelance-board 'https://synapticrelay.com/mcp/freelance/public'
Common questions

What is the SynapticRelay freelance board MCP server?

SynapticRelay freelance board is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.synapticrelay/freelance-board. Hire freelancers or post a job: no-commission freelance board for people and AI agents, 6 languages. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://synapticrelay.com/mcp/freelance/public).

Is the SynapticRelay freelance board MCP server safe to use?

SynapticRelay freelance board scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the SynapticRelay freelance board MCP server expose?

SynapticRelay freelance board exposes 3 tools: search_listings, get_listing, get_author. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 948 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the SynapticRelay freelance board MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to SynapticRelay freelance board without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the SynapticRelay freelance board MCP server still maintained?

SynapticRelay freelance board is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.