Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Rate-My-Agent

REMOTE · MCP.RATE-MY-AGENT.COM · SCANNED SEP 28

Get matched with a top-rated, review-verified real estate agent in the US or Canada.

0 this week 67 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability65
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 911 tokens (~303/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability check failed: schema churn in the 30 days we've observed: 3 tool removals, 0 breaking changes, 0 auth/transport breaks, 3 additions. See how to fix → Fail
Tool Coverage87
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 53% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Install

How do I install the Rate-My-Agent MCP server?

Rate-My-Agent is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.rate-my-agent.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.rate-my-agent.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-rate-my-agent-mcp-rate-my-agent 'https://mcp.rate-my-agent.com/mcp'
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-rate-my-agent-mcp-rate-my-agent": {
      "url": "https://mcp.rate-my-agent.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "com-rate-my-agent-mcp-rate-my-agent": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.rate-my-agent.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.com-rate-my-agent-mcp-rate-my-agent]
url = "https://mcp.rate-my-agent.com/mcp"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "com-rate-my-agent-mcp-rate-my-agent": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://mcp.rate-my-agent.com/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add com-rate-my-agent-mcp-rate-my-agent --url 'https://mcp.rate-my-agent.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  com-rate-my-agent-mcp-rate-my-agent:
    url: "https://mcp.rate-my-agent.com/mcp"
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "com-rate-my-agent-mcp-rate-my-agent": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://mcp.rate-my-agent.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add com-rate-my-agent-mcp-rate-my-agent -t streamable-http -u 'https://mcp.rate-my-agent.com/mcp'
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-rate-my-agent-mcp-rate-my-agent": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.rate-my-agent.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 11 Sept 26 −9
    • Stability: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Tool “get_lead_quiz” was removed ▼ security
    • Tool “search_agents” was removed ▼ security
    • Tool “submit_lead” was removed ▼ security
    • Injection markers: fail → pass ▲ security
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Schema quality: 501 → 303 ▲ functional
    • Server version: 1.1.1 → 1.2.0 functional
    • New tool “get_local_agent_review_data” functional
    • New tool “get_matching_questions” functional
    • New tool “submit_match_request” functional
  • 26 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Aug 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 11 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 31 Jul 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 30 Jul 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 28 Sept 2026 · Probed https://mcp.rate-my-agent.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=rate-my-agent.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 19 Sept 2026 18 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 e2a8be2a1291d2021392796a9bc8e2e8
SANs: rate-my-agent.com, mcp.rate-my-agent.com, *.mcp.rate-my-agent.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.rate-my-agent.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
rate-my-agent.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.rate-my-agent.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.rate-my-agent.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://mcp.rate-my-agent.com/mcp
MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~612 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_local_agent_review_data ~168

Returns Rate-My-Agent.com's verified-review statistics for one city: how many reviewed agents and verified reviews exist there and site-wide, the average rating, the most-reviewed neighbourhoods, and whether the free matching service covers that city (it covers every US and Canadian city). Call it when the user asks about real estate agents in a specific place, or before running the matching questionnaire, to show what the ratings are based on. It returns aggregate statistics only — it does not return, rank or recommend individual agents. To collect the user's requirements, call get_matching_questions next.

NameTypeReqDescription
citystringyesCity name, e.g. "Austin" or "Vancouver".
prov_statestringyes2-letter province/state code, e.g. "BC", "TX".
NameTypeReqDescription
adapter_versionstring––
citystring––
city_proof–––
coverage–––
network_proof–––
prov_statestring––

No examples provided.

get_matching_questions ~127

Returns the questions the matching service asks, each with its exact answer options and the values submit_match_request expects, plus the questionnaire version. Call it when the user wants to be matched with an agent, so the questions and accepted values always come from the service itself rather than from memory. Ask only the questions the conversation has not already answered, one at a time, presenting options as a numbered list. Financing applies to buyers and property condition to sellers. Once every required question is answered and you have the user's name, email and phone, confirm the details with them and call submit_match_request.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
adapter_versionstring––
assistant_instructionsstring––
principlestring––
questions–––
quiz_versionstring––
thenstring––

No examples provided.

submit_match_request ~317

Submits the user's completed questionnaire and contact details to Rate-My-Agent.com's free agent-matching service. Call it only after showing the user their answers and contact details and receiving an explicit confirmation; set consent to true to record that confirmation. Use each option's exact value from get_matching_questions. Handling the result: report success only on "ok":true, and relay the returned message verbatim. On "ok":false with code "no_response" the service did not answer in time — call it once more. On "ok":false with a field and message (for example an invalid email), tell the user what to correct, collect the new value and submit again.

NameTypeReqDescription
addressstringyesFor SELLERS: the property's full street address. For BUYERS: the city or neighbourhood they are targeting.
also_buying_or_sellingstring––
budgetstring–Use an exact option value from get_matching_questions.
buy_sellstringyes–
consentbooleanyesSet to true ONLY after the user picks "1. Confirm and Submit Request". Must be true to submit.
emailstringyes–
financing_helpstring–Buyers only — exact option value.
full_namestringyes–
notesstring––
phonestringyesNorth-American number; 10 digits.
property_conditionstring–Sellers only — exact option value.
property_typestring––
quiz_versionstring––
NameTypeReqDescription
codestring–e.g. invalid_input, invalid_email, no_response.
fieldstring–Which field to correct, when applicable.
http_statusnumber––
messagestring–Relay verbatim on success; on error, the fix to explain.
okbooleanyestrue only when the lead was accepted.
retryableboolean–true means submit once more.
statusstring––

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the Rate-My-Agent MCP server?

Rate-My-Agent is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.rate-my-agent.mcp/rate-my-agent. Get matched with a top-rated, review-verified real estate agent in the US or Canada. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.rate-my-agent.com/mcp).

Is the Rate-My-Agent MCP server safe to use?

Rate-My-Agent scores 67 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Rate-My-Agent MCP server expose?

Rate-My-Agent exposes 3 tools: get_local_agent_review_data, get_matching_questions, submit_match_request. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 612 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Rate-My-Agent MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Rate-My-Agent without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Rate-My-Agent MCP server still maintained?

Rate-My-Agent is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 28 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.