Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia
NPM · FEELING-SEARCH-MCP · 2 COMPONENTS
One sentence in, the best-matching visual style out: art reference chart and prompt encyclopedia.
Available components
Last scanned (17 hours ago)
Scores higher than 34% of npm servers
Category Design and Media
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 6 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability60
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1311 tokens (~262/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
Checks we ran (15)
- Malware scan
- Known CVEs
- Install scripts
- Dependency health
- Source repository
- Provenance
- License
- Maintenance
- Security disclosure
- Schema quality
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Checks we could not complete (1)
These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.
- Stability in Stability & Change Management (scores 0 for this)Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).
Does not apply to this package (2)
- Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
- Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 31 Oct 26 +11
- Known CVEs: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Dependency health: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- 30 Oct 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 29 Oct 26 +1
- Known CVEs: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- First check of Judged manipulation: pass security
- Stability: Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window). security
- Tool safety: Tool safety not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool text to scan. security
- Stability: Stability not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to compare. security
- MCP protocol: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- Dependency health: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- First check of Schema quality: fail functional
- First check of Schema quality: good functional
- First check of Tool coverage: 100 functional
- First check of Schema quality: fail functional
- First check of Destructive annotations: pass functional
- Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool definitions to assess. functional
- Capabilities: Protocol version not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we never saw its MCP handshake. functional
- Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to assess. functional
- Package version: 0.1.3 → 0.2.6 functional
- Package version: 0.1.3 → 0.2.4 functional
- 28 Oct 26 +11
- Known CVEs: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Tool safety: Tool safety not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the tool definitions this version of the package serves yet. security
- Stability: Stability not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. security
- Dependency health: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the tool definitions this version of the package serves yet. functional
- Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. functional
- Capabilities: Protocol version not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP handshake this version of the package performs yet. functional
- Package version: 0.1.2 → 0.1.3 functional
- 27 Oct 26 28
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/feeling-search-mcp@0.2.6
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 0 packages
| Packages resolved | 0 |
|---|---|
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
style_get 取单个风格的定义与对应图片 ~107
按风格 id（或中文名）取一个风格：定义、生成用提示词、感受词、年代地域，以及它对应的图片（thumb 320 / full 960 绝对地址，带 kind/credit/license）。kind=work 是有出处的真作品，synthetic 是 AI 示意，placeholder 是占位图。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | 风格 id（如 synthwave）或中文名（如 合成器波） |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
word_analyze 把一句描述解析成词与风格 ~247
把一句中文/英文口语描述解析成感受词与视觉风格。默认纯本地词典（免费、不联网）；本地一个词都没命中且允许时，才上云。返回 score 是相对值不是概率，styles[].matched 是可以直接引用给用户看的命中词。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| allow_cloud | boolean | – | 本地零命中且本机没装引擎时，是否允许上云 |
| lang | string | – | 用哪个语义引擎：auto 按是否含汉字判定。中文问句请用中文整句，英文问句请用英文整句，中英混写会落到中文引擎 |
| quota | string | – | 已购额度令牌（响应头 X-FS-Quota 的值）。本机也可用环境变量 FS_QUOTA；远端 MCP 客户端没法设环境变量，就用这个参数 |
| styles | integer | – | 返回几个视觉风格 |
| text | string | yes | 要解析的描述，最长 500 字 |
| words | integer | – | 返回几个感受词 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
word_list 枚举感受词或视觉风格 ~58
列出全部感受词（带共享度）或视觉风格（带定义与词集规模）。调 analyze 之前先拉一次可避免名字拼错。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| kind | string | – | 枚举哪一类 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
word_lookup 查一个词落在哪些风格 ~61
查一个感受词：落在哪些风格、对立词是什么、常一起出现的词、是否标识词。纯本地查表。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| word | string | yes | 要查的词，如「留白」「枯淡」 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
word_status 查看词表版本与云端额度状态 ~35
返回词表版本、规模（词/风格/变种/挂靠率）以及是否配置了云端额度。
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server?
Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y feeling-search-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · feeling-search-mcp
claude mcp add cloud-xiximm-feeling-search -- npx -y feeling-search-mcp
What is the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server?
Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as cloud.xiximm/feeling-search. One sentence in, the best-matching visual style out: art reference chart and prompt encyclopedia. This page covers its npm package (feeling-search-mcp).
Is the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server safe to use?
Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia scores 66 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server expose?
Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia exposes 5 tools: word_analyze, word_lookup, word_list, style_get, word_status. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 508 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server still maintained?
Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server under?
Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 15 checks on Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 11 more. One item could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia: Stability. One category scores 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an npm package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.