Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia
REMOTE · XIXIMM.CLOUD · 2 COMPONENTS
One sentence in, the best-matching visual style out: art reference chart and prompt encyclopedia.
Available components
Last scanned (6 hours ago)
Scores higher than 57% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Design and Media
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability60
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1327 tokens (~265/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management30
- Stability observed for 9 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Schema quality: 196 → 265 ▼ functional
- “word_analyze” added an optional parameter “lang” cosmetic
- “word_analyze” reworded the description of “allow_cloud” cosmetic
- 28 Oct 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Schema quality: 167 → 196 ▼ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- “word_analyze” added an optional parameter “quota” cosmetic
- 27 Oct 26 68
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://xiximm.cloud/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=xiximm.cloud | CN=TrustAsia DV TLS RSA CA 2025,O=TrustAsia Technologies\, Inc.,C=CN | 24 Oct 2026 | 21 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | e52f1f8b6c6fe3f05328269e6d3fbb3 |
| SANs: xiximm.cloud | ||||||
| CN=TrustAsia DV TLS RSA CA 2025,O=TrustAsia Technologies\, Inc.,C=CN (CA) | CN=DigiCert Global Root G2,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US | 8 Jan 2025 | 7 Jan 2035 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | 926323b4964e368461512def1a5d52c |
| CN=DigiCert Global Root G2,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US (CA) | CN=DigiCert Global Root G2,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US | 1 Aug 2013 | 15 Jan 2038 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 33af1e6a711a9a0bb2864b11d09fae5 |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of xiximm.cloud. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| cloud. | DS published | 7041 | 13 | Verified |
| xiximm.cloud. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://xiximm.cloud/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://xiximm.cloud/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 302 | https://xiximm.cloud/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
style_get 取单个风格的定义与对应图片 ~107
按风格 id（或中文名）取一个风格：定义、生成用提示词、感受词、年代地域，以及它对应的图片（thumb 320 / full 960 绝对地址，带 kind/credit/license）。kind=work 是有出处的真作品，synthetic 是 AI 示意，placeholder 是占位图。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | 风格 id（如 synthwave）或中文名（如 合成器波） |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
word_analyze 把一句描述解析成词与风格 ~263
把一句中文/英文口语描述解析成感受词与视觉风格。默认纯本地词典（免费、不联网）；本地一个词都没命中且允许时，才上云。返回 score 是相对值不是概率，styles[].matched 是可以直接引用给用户看的命中词。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| allow_cloud | boolean | – | 本地零命中且本机没装引擎时，是否允许上云（远端默认关闭；显式传 true 才会消耗额度） |
| lang | string | – | 用哪个语义引擎：auto 按是否含汉字判定。中文问句请用中文整句，英文问句请用英文整句，中英混写会落到中文引擎 |
| quota | string | – | 已购额度令牌（响应头 X-FS-Quota 的值）。本机也可用环境变量 FS_QUOTA；远端 MCP 客户端没法设环境变量，就用这个参数 |
| styles | integer | – | 返回几个视觉风格 |
| text | string | yes | 要解析的描述，最长 500 字 |
| words | integer | – | 返回几个感受词 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
word_list 枚举感受词或视觉风格 ~58
列出全部感受词（带共享度）或视觉风格（带定义与词集规模）。调 analyze 之前先拉一次可避免名字拼错。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| kind | string | – | 枚举哪一类 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
word_lookup 查一个词落在哪些风格 ~61
查一个感受词：落在哪些风格、对立词是什么、常一起出现的词、是否标识词。纯本地查表。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| word | string | yes | 要查的词，如「留白」「枯淡」 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
word_status 查看词表版本与云端额度状态 ~35
返回词表版本、规模（词/风格/变种/挂靠率）以及是否配置了云端额度。
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server?
Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia is a hosted endpoint at https://xiximm.cloud/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · xiximm.cloud
claude mcp add --transport http cloud-xiximm-feeling-search 'https://xiximm.cloud/mcp'
What is the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server?
Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as cloud.xiximm/feeling-search. One sentence in, the best-matching visual style out: art reference chart and prompt encyclopedia. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://xiximm.cloud/mcp).
Is the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server safe to use?
Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia scores 71 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server expose?
Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia exposes 5 tools: word_analyze, word_lookup, word_list, style_get, word_status. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 524 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server still maintained?
Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.