# Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia (npm · feeling-search-mcp)

One sentence in, the best-matching visual style out: art reference chart and prompt encyclopedia.

- Trust score: 66/100 (medium)
- Change this week: +26
- Registry status: active
- Liveness: live
- Owner verified: no
- Last scored: 2026-11-05

## Components

- remote · `xiximm.cloud`: 71/100, [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloud-xiximm-feeling-search/xiximm.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloud-xiximm-feeling-search/xiximm)
- npm · `feeling-search-mcp`: 66/100 (this document), [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloud-xiximm-feeling-search/feeling-search-mcp.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloud-xiximm-feeling-search/feeling-search-mcp)

## Channel facts

- Registry: `npm`
- Package: `feeling-search-mcp`
- Version: `0.2.6`
- Transport: `stdio`

## Trust breakdown

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. Scores are 0–100 per category. Scoring method: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring (what has changed: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring/changelog)

Scored 2026-11-05.

- **Supply Chain Security**: 100/100
  - No malware found by supply-chain analysis.
  - No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.
  - No install/post-install scripts declared.
  - No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess.
- **Provenance & Transparency**: 45/100
  - Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL.
  - Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published.
  - Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).
  - Actively maintained (last published 6 days ago).
  - Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository.
- **Schema Quality & AI Usability**: 60/100
  - AI-judged instruction clarity (good).
  - Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1311 tokens (~262/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params.
  - Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples.
- **Stability & Change Management**: 0/100
  - Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).
- **Tool Coverage**: 100/100
  - 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).
  - 100% of tool parameters carry a description.
- **Tool Safety**: 100/100
  - No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.
  - We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.
  - An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.
- **Capabilities**: 60/100
  - Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28.

**Unverified: 1 category.** A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.

## Install

### How do I install the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server?

Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y feeling-search-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

### Claude

```bash
claude mcp add cloud-xiximm-feeling-search -- npx -y feeling-search-mcp
```

### Cursor

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cloud-xiximm-feeling-search": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "feeling-search-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
```

### VS Code

```json
{
  "servers": {
    "cloud-xiximm-feeling-search": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "feeling-search-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
```

### Codex

```bash
codex mcp add cloud-xiximm-feeling-search -- npx -y feeling-search-mcp
```

### opencode

```json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "cloud-xiximm-feeling-search": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "npx",
        "-y",
        "feeling-search-mcp"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
```

### OpenClaw

```bash
openclaw mcp add cloud-xiximm-feeling-search --command npx --arg -y --arg feeling-search-mcp
```

### Hermes

```yaml
mcp_servers:
  cloud-xiximm-feeling-search:
    command: "npx"
    args: ["-y", "feeling-search-mcp"]
```

### Netclaw

```json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "cloud-xiximm-feeling-search": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "npx",
      "Arguments": [
        "-y",
        "feeling-search-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
```

### Vellum

```bash
assistant mcp add cloud-xiximm-feeling-search -t stdio -c npx -a -y feeling-search-mcp
```

### Other

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cloud-xiximm-feeling-search": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "feeling-search-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
```

## Changelog

Every change recorded for this component, newest first. Days that predate change tracking, or that we cannot explain, say so: "we were watching and nothing happened" and "we were not watching" are different claims.

### 2026-10-31 (score 66, +11)

- [security improvement] Known CVEs: unverified → pass
- [functional improvement] Dependency health: unverified → pass

### 2026-10-30 (score 55, +15)

- [security improvement] Malware scan: unverified → pass

### 2026-10-29 (score 40, +1)

- [security regression] Known CVEs: pass → unverified
- [security regression] Malware scan: pass → unverified
- [security improvement] Injection markers: unverified → pass
- [security] First check of Judged manipulation: pass
- [security] Stability: Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).
- [security] Tool safety: Tool safety not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool text to scan.
- [security] Stability: Stability not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to compare.
- [functional regression] MCP protocol: unverified → fail
- [functional regression] Dependency health: pass → unverified
- [functional improvement] Tool coverage: unverified → 100
- [functional] First check of Schema quality: fail
- [functional] First check of Schema quality: good
- [functional] First check of Tool coverage: 100
- [functional] First check of Schema quality: fail
- [functional] First check of Destructive annotations: pass
- [functional] Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool definitions to assess.
- [functional] Capabilities: Protocol version not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we never saw its MCP handshake.
- [functional] Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to assess.
- [functional] Package version: 0.1.3 → 0.2.6
- [functional] Package version: 0.1.3 → 0.2.4

### 2026-10-28 (score 39, +11)

- [security improvement] Known CVEs: unverified → pass
- [security] Tool safety: Tool safety not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the tool definitions this version of the package serves yet.
- [security] Stability: Stability not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet.
- [functional improvement] Dependency health: unverified → pass
- [functional] Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the tool definitions this version of the package serves yet.
- [functional] Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet.
- [functional] Capabilities: Protocol version not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP handshake this version of the package performs yet.
- [functional] Package version: 0.1.2 → 0.1.3

### 2026-10-27 (score 28)

First indexed and scored.

## MCP tools (5)

### `word_analyze` (~247 tokens)

把一句描述解析成词与风格

把一句中文/英文口语描述解析成感受词与视觉风格。默认纯本地词典（免费、不联网）；本地一个词都没命中且允许时，才上云。返回 score 是相对值不是概率，styles[].matched 是可以直接引用给用户看的命中词。

Input parameters:

- `allow_cloud` (boolean): 本地零命中且本机没装引擎时，是否允许上云
- `lang` (string): 用哪个语义引擎：auto 按是否含汉字判定。中文问句请用中文整句，英文问句请用英文整句，中英混写会落到中文引擎
- `quota` (string): 已购额度令牌（响应头 X-FS-Quota 的值）。本机也可用环境变量 FS_QUOTA；远端 MCP 客户端没法设环境变量，就用这个参数
- `styles` (integer): 返回几个视觉风格
- `text` (string, required): 要解析的描述，最长 500 字
- `words` (integer): 返回几个感受词

### `word_lookup` (~61 tokens)

查一个词落在哪些风格

查一个感受词：落在哪些风格、对立词是什么、常一起出现的词、是否标识词。纯本地查表。

Input parameters:

- `word` (string, required): 要查的词，如「留白」「枯淡」

### `word_list` (~58 tokens)

枚举感受词或视觉风格

列出全部感受词（带共享度）或视觉风格（带定义与词集规模）。调 analyze 之前先拉一次可避免名字拼错。

Input parameters:

- `kind` (string): 枚举哪一类

### `style_get` (~107 tokens)

取单个风格的定义与对应图片

按风格 id（或中文名）取一个风格：定义、生成用提示词、感受词、年代地域，以及它对应的图片（thumb 320 / full 960 绝对地址，带 kind/credit/license）。kind=work 是有出处的真作品，synthetic 是 AI 示意，placeholder 是占位图。

Input parameters:

- `id` (string, required): 风格 id（如 synthwave）或中文名（如 合成器波）

### `word_status` (~35 tokens)

查看词表版本与云端额度状态

返回词表版本、规模（词/风格/变种/挂靠率）以及是否配置了云端额度。

## Diagnostics

Captured diagnostic sections: Provenance, Dependencies. The full working is on the page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloud-xiximm-feeling-search/feeling-search-mcp#diagnostics

## Score history

- 2026-11-05: 66
- 2026-11-04: 66
- 2026-11-03: 66
- 2026-11-02: 66
- 2026-11-01: 66
- 2026-10-31: 66
- 2026-10-30: 55
- 2026-10-29: 40
- 2026-10-28: 39
- 2026-10-27: 28

## Common questions

### What is the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server?

Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as cloud.xiximm/feeling-search. One sentence in, the best-matching visual style out: art reference chart and prompt encyclopedia. This page covers its npm package (feeling-search-mcp).

### Is the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server safe to use?

Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia scores 66 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

### What tools does the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server expose?

Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia exposes 5 tools: word_analyze, word_lookup, word_list, style_get, word_status. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 508 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

### Is the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server still maintained?

Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

### What licence is the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server under?

Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

### What did VerifyMCP test on the Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 15 checks on Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 11 more. One item could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Feeling Search — Art Style Reference & Prompt Encyclopedia: Stability. One category scores 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an npm package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.

## Links

- npm package: https://www.npmjs.com/package/feeling-search-mcp
- Socket report: https://socket.dev/npm/package/feeling-search-mcp
- Repository: https://github.com/xixi048/feeling-search-mcp
- Website: https://xiximm.cloud/
- Changelog RSS feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloud-xiximm-feeling-search/feeling-search-mcp.xml
- Changelog JSON feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloud-xiximm-feeling-search/feeling-search-mcp/changelog.json
- Trust report (JSON): https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloud-xiximm-feeling-search/feeling-search-mcp.json
- HTML version of this page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloud-xiximm-feeling-search/feeling-search-mcp