io.github.Cail726/chinese-text-tools
NPM · CHINESE-TEXT-TOOLS · SCANNED SEP 20
Claude Code 中文写作四合一工具箱：文本分析（字数/段落/阅读时间）、结构化大纲生成（论文/小说/商业计划书）、GB/T 7714 参考文献格式化、中文字频统计。纯本地运行。
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security98
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 31 of 95 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 64 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability79
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 462 tokens (~115/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management93
- Stability observed for 28 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the io.github.Cail726/chinese-text-tools MCP server?
io.github.Cail726/chinese-text-tools runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y chinese-text-tools. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · chinese-text-tools
claude mcp add cail726-chinese-text-tools -- npx -y chinese-text-tools
{
"mcpServers": {
"cail726-chinese-text-tools": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"chinese-text-tools"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"cail726-chinese-text-tools": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"chinese-text-tools"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add cail726-chinese-text-tools -- npx -y chinese-text-tools
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"cail726-chinese-text-tools": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"chinese-text-tools"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add cail726-chinese-text-tools --command npx --arg -y --arg chinese-text-tools
mcp_servers:
cail726-chinese-text-tools:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "chinese-text-tools"] {
"McpServers": {
"cail726-chinese-text-tools": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"chinese-text-tools"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add cail726-chinese-text-tools -t stdio -c npx -a -y chinese-text-tools
{
"mcpServers": {
"cail726-chinese-text-tools": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"chinese-text-tools"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 15 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 8 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/chinese-text-tools@1.0.3
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 95 packages
| Packages resolved | 95 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 31 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
analyze_text ~74
分析中文/英文混合文本。返回 editorWordCount（与番茄/作家助手对齐的字数）、段落数、平均段长、预估阅读时间。适用于小说章节、论文章节的快速评估。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | string | yes | 要分析的文本内容 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
count_frequency ~72
统计中文文本的字频分布。用于分析写作风格、检测重复用词、优化文本表达。默认返回前20个高频字。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | string | yes | 要分析的文本 |
| topN | number | – | 返回前N个高频字，默认20 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
format_gbt7714 ~220
将文献信息格式化为 GB/T 7714-2015 标准引用格式（中文毕业论文通用格式）。支持期刊论文、图书、学位论文、专利、标准、在线资源、会议论文。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accessDate | string | – | 引用日期，如 '2025-07-17'（在线资源） |
| authors | string | yes | 作者，多人用分号分隔，如 '张三; 李四' |
| doi | string | – | DOI 号 |
| issue | string | – | 期号（期刊论文） |
| journal | string | yes | 期刊名/出版社/学校名 |
| pages | string | – | 页码，如 '45-50' |
| title | string | yes | 文献标题 |
| type | string | – | 文献类型，默认 journal |
| url | string | – | 网址（在线资源） |
| volume | string | – | 卷号（期刊论文） |
| year | string | yes | 出版年份 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
generate_outline ~96
根据主题生成结构化大纲。支持三种类型：paper（学术论文）、novel（小说）、business（商业计划书）。支持三级详细程度：brief（仅一级标题）、medium（二级）、detailed（三级）。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| detailLevel | string | – | 详细程度，默认 detailed |
| topic | string | yes | 主题/标题 |
| type | string | – | 大纲类型，默认 paper |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.Cail726/chinese-text-tools MCP server?
io.github.Cail726/chinese-text-tools is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Cail726/chinese-text-tools. Claude Code 中文写作四合一工具箱：文本分析（字数/段落/阅读时间）、结构化大纲生成（论文/小说/商业计划书）、GB/T 7714 参考文献格式化、中文字频统计。纯本地运行。 This page covers its npm package (chinese-text-tools).
Is the io.github.Cail726/chinese-text-tools MCP server safe to use?
io.github.Cail726/chinese-text-tools scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.Cail726/chinese-text-tools MCP server expose?
io.github.Cail726/chinese-text-tools exposes 4 tools: analyze_text, generate_outline, format_gbt7714, count_frequency. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 462 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.Cail726/chinese-text-tools MCP server still maintained?
io.github.Cail726/chinese-text-tools is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.Cail726/chinese-text-tools MCP server under?
io.github.Cail726/chinese-text-tools declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.