Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.yaotsakpo/ledgerfc

REMOTE · MCP.LEDGERFC.COM · 2 COMPONENTS · SCANNED SEP 20

Grounded sports predictions plus European soccer and tennis arbitrage data for AI agents.

+3 this week 71 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security57
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability65
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 640 tokens (~49/item across 13 items; 13 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management93
  • Stability observed for 28 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage81
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 43% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 13 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 13 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Install

How do I install the io.github.yaotsakpo/ledgerfc MCP server?

io.github.yaotsakpo/ledgerfc is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.ledgerfc.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.ledgerfc.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http yaotsakpo-ledgerfc 'https://mcp.ledgerfc.com/mcp'
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "yaotsakpo-ledgerfc": {
      "url": "https://mcp.ledgerfc.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "yaotsakpo-ledgerfc": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.ledgerfc.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.yaotsakpo-ledgerfc]
url = "https://mcp.ledgerfc.com/mcp"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "yaotsakpo-ledgerfc": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://mcp.ledgerfc.com/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add yaotsakpo-ledgerfc --url 'https://mcp.ledgerfc.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  yaotsakpo-ledgerfc:
    url: "https://mcp.ledgerfc.com/mcp"
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "yaotsakpo-ledgerfc": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://mcp.ledgerfc.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add yaotsakpo-ledgerfc -t streamable-http -u 'https://mcp.ledgerfc.com/mcp'
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "yaotsakpo-ledgerfc": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.ledgerfc.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 20 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 15 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 13 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 11 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 9 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 7 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 5 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://mcp.ledgerfc.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=mcp.ledgerfc.com CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 22 Aug 2026 20 Nov 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 649a5553ebb52a36c0eca4d50d2916e9aec
SANs: mcp.ledgerfc.com
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.ledgerfc.com. Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
ledgerfc.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.ledgerfc.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.ledgerfc.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://mcp.ledgerfc.com/mcp
MCP tools · 13 exposed · ~640 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
fetch ~37

Fetch the full prediction document for a search result id.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesA result id from search, e.g. pred:123.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_arbs ~160

PRO: recently detected live arbitrage opportunities. Needs a Pro key, via an Authorization: Bearer header (preferred) or the api_key argument.

NameTypeReqDescription
api_keystringOptional Pro API key (get one with /key in the Ledger FC Telegram bot). Preferred instead: send it as an Authorization: Bearer header, so it never enters the conversation.
live_rescanbooleanIf true, fetch fresh odds NOW and return current arbs (age ~0) instead of logged ones. Rate-limited (costs API credits). Falls back to logged arbs if unavailable.
within_secondsintegerLook-back window in seconds. Default is tight because arbs die fast; widen only for a historical view.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_balance ~25

Your paper-points balance (not cash).

NameTypeReqDescription
agent_idstringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_bet ~23

One paper bet by id.

NameTypeReqDescription
bet_idintegeryes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_contributor_score ~25

A contributor's CLV record.

NameTypeReqDescription
contributor_idstringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_leaderboard ~23

Contributors ranked by CLV (reputation points, not cash).

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_my_bets ~25

Your paper bets, newest first.

NameTypeReqDescription
agent_idstringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_predictions ~47

Upcoming predictions with probabilities and model-vs-market edge.

NameTypeReqDescription
leaguestringFilter to one league code, e.g. EPL.
limitintegerMax predictions to return.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_track_record ~20

Honest settled record + high-confidence subset + CLV.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_value_bets ~87

PRO: upcoming picks with positive model-vs-market edge. Needs a Pro key, via an Authorization: Bearer header (preferred) or the api_key argument.

NameTypeReqDescription
api_keystringOptional Pro API key (get one with /key in the Ledger FC Telegram bot). Preferred instead: send it as an Authorization: Bearer header, so it never enters the conversation.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

place_bet ~61

Place a paper bet against our agent's prediction (points only).

NameTypeReqDescription
agent_idstringyes
match_idintegeryes
sidestringyes
stake_pointsnumberyesPaper points to stake (min 1).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search ~44

Search upcoming match predictions. Returns {id,title,url} results; use fetch(id) for the full prediction.

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringTeam or league to search upcoming predictions for.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

submit_prediction ~63

Submit a prediction to be scored by CLV (shadow/points).

NameTypeReqDescription
contributor_idstringyes
match_idintegeryes
p_awaynumberyes
p_drawnumberyes
p_homenumberyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the io.github.yaotsakpo/ledgerfc MCP server?

io.github.yaotsakpo/ledgerfc is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.yaotsakpo/ledgerfc. Grounded sports predictions plus European soccer and tennis arbitrage data for AI agents. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.ledgerfc.com/mcp).

Is the io.github.yaotsakpo/ledgerfc MCP server safe to use?

io.github.yaotsakpo/ledgerfc scores 71 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.yaotsakpo/ledgerfc MCP server expose?

io.github.yaotsakpo/ledgerfc exposes 13 tools: get_track_record, get_predictions, get_arbs, get_value_bets, search, and 8 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 640 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the io.github.yaotsakpo/ledgerfc MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to io.github.yaotsakpo/ledgerfc without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the io.github.yaotsakpo/ledgerfc MCP server still maintained?

io.github.yaotsakpo/ledgerfc is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.