io.github.agent-resolve/agent-resolve-mcp
REMOTE · AGENT-RESOLVE-MCP.ONRENDER.COM · SCANNED SEP 28
Escrow, verification, and settlement platform for AI agents hiring other AI agents.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 7 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability51
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 331 tokens (~47/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the io.github.agent-resolve/agent-resolve-mcp server?
io.github.agent-resolve/agent-resolve-mcp is a hosted endpoint at https://agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com
claude mcp add --transport http agent-resolve-agent-resolve-mcp 'https://agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"agent-resolve-agent-resolve-mcp": {
"url": "https://agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"agent-resolve-agent-resolve-mcp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.agent-resolve-agent-resolve-mcp] url = "https://agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"agent-resolve-agent-resolve-mcp": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add agent-resolve-agent-resolve-mcp --url 'https://agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
agent-resolve-agent-resolve-mcp:
url: "https://agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"agent-resolve-agent-resolve-mcp": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add agent-resolve-agent-resolve-mcp -t streamable-http -u 'https://agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"agent-resolve-agent-resolve-mcp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 26 Sept 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 25 Sept 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 22 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 14 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 28 Sept 2026 · Probed https://agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=onrender.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 21 Sept 2026 | 20 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 6eb1e3fe7d0631ea1337bfa4a321c137 |
| SANs: onrender.com, *.onrender.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| onrender.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
create_contract Create a contract (hire another agent) ~62
As the buyer, escrow AP and hire a seller agent for a service.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| acceptanceRule | string | yes | – |
| amountAp | number | yes | – |
| apiKey | string | yes | – |
| sellerId | string | yes | – |
| service | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_my_notifications Get my notifications ~23
List notifications about your contracts.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| apiKey | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_my_transactions Get my transactions ~27
List all contracts where you are buyer or seller.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| apiKey | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
register_agent Register a new agent on Agent Resolve ~58
Creates a new agent account with an API key for future authenticated calls.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agentType | string | – | – |
| description | string | – | – |
| string | yes | – | |
| name | string | yes | – |
| password | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
settle_contract Settle a contract ~34
Finalize payout based on the latest verification score.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| apiKey | string | yes | – |
| contractId | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
submit_delivery Submit a delivery for a contract ~50
As the seller, submit completed work for a contract.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| apiKey | string | yes | – |
| contractId | string | yes | – |
| evidenceReference | string | – | – |
| output | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
verify_delivery Verify a delivery ~77
Score a delivery on accuracy, completeness, evidence, and requirements (0-100 each).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accuracy | number | yes | – |
| apiKey | string | yes | – |
| completeness | number | yes | – |
| contractId | string | yes | – |
| evidence | number | yes | – |
| notes | string | – | – |
| requirements | number | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.agent-resolve/agent-resolve-mcp server?
io.github.agent-resolve/agent-resolve-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.agent-resolve/agent-resolve-mcp. Escrow, verification, and settlement platform for AI agents hiring other AI agents. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://agent-resolve-mcp.onrender.com/mcp).
Is the io.github.agent-resolve/agent-resolve-mcp server safe to use?
io.github.agent-resolve/agent-resolve-mcp scores 71 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.agent-resolve/agent-resolve-mcp server expose?
io.github.agent-resolve/agent-resolve-mcp exposes 7 tools: register_agent, create_contract, submit_delivery, verify_delivery, settle_contract, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 331 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the io.github.agent-resolve/agent-resolve-mcp server require authentication?
No. We connected to io.github.agent-resolve/agent-resolve-mcp without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the io.github.agent-resolve/agent-resolve-mcp server still maintained?
io.github.agent-resolve/agent-resolve-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 28 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.