Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

RemedyBridge free tools for tenants

REMOTE · REMEDYBRIDGE.CO.UK

Free tools for UK tenants: Awaab's Law and complaint deadlines, repair letters, housing help search

+3 this week 75 Trust /100

Last scanned (4 hours ago)

Scores higher than 64% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Documents and Files

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability62
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2193 tokens (~365/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management27
  • Stability observed for 8 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1
    • Tool “search_housing_repair_help” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 28 Oct 26 71

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://remedybridge.co.uk/mcp/

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=remedybridge.co.uk CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 30 Oct 2026 28 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 518ac6225f2b1501eec0f016bab2828f486
SANs: remedybridge.co.uk
CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of remedybridge.co.uk. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
uk. present 43876 8 Verified
co.uk. present 11810 8 Verified
remedybridge.co.uk. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://challenges.cloudflare.com https://*.googletagmanager.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https://*.google-analytics.com https://*.googletagmanager.com; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://api.remedybridge.co.uk https://*.google-analytics.com https://*.analytics.google.com https://*.googletagmanager.com; frame-src https://challenges.cloudflare.com; frame-ancestors 'none'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; upgrade-insecure-requests
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), browsing-topics=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://remedybridge.co.uk/mcp/ Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://remedybridge.co.uk/mcp/ HTTPS enforced 308 https://remedybridge.co.uk/mcp/
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~1,997 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
build_evidence_checklist ~210

Lists the evidence worth gathering about disrepair in a rented home, for the problems and the landlord given: what everyone should keep (dated photos, copies of every report, reference numbers, appointments and complaint letters), then what each problem needs and what each kind of landlord’s case needs. Problems: "damp" (damp or mould), "leak" (leaks or water ingress), "heating" (heating or boiler), "electrics" (unsafe electrics), "windows" (windows or doors), "pests" (pests or vermin), "structural" (structural or plaster). It asks for no personal details.

NameTypeReqDescription
landlordstring–"council", "association" (a housing association) or "private".
problemsarray–The problems in the home, any of "damp", "leak", "heating", "electrics", "windows", "pests", "structural".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

calculate_landlord_complaint_deadlines ~399

Works out when a council or housing association in England must acknowledge and answer a tenant’s complaint under the Housing Ombudsman’s Complaint Handling Code (2024): at stage 1, acknowledge within 5 working days and respond within 10 working days of acknowledging (paras 6.2 to 6.4); at stage 2, acknowledge within 5 and respond within 20 (paras 6.11 to 6.15), each with the longest extension. It counts working days, leaving out weekends and bank holidays in England and Wales; a complaint received at a weekend or on a bank holiday counts from the next working day. Give the dates the landlord acknowledged or answered, if it has, to see whether each was on time. It says when the Code does not usually apply (private landlords, Wales). It never says what a complaint will achieve.

NameTypeReqDescription
acknowledgedOnstring–The day the landlord acknowledged it, if it has (YYYY-MM-DD).
asAtstring–Work it out as at this date instead of today in England (YYYY-MM-DD).
landlordstringyesWho the landlord is: "council" or "housing_association" (in England), "private" (a private landlord or letting agent) or "wales" (any landlord in Wales).
receivedOnstring–The day the landlord received the complaint (stage 1) or the request for stage 2. Sent by email or an online form: the day it was sent (YYYY-MM-DD).
respondedOnstring–The day the landlord gave its response at this stage, if it has (YYYY-MM-DD).
stagestring–For a council or housing association: "1" for a complaint, or "2" when the tenant has asked for it to go to stage 2 after an unsatisfactory stage 1 answer.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

calculate_pre_action_protocol_timetable ~365

Works out the timetable the Pre-Action Protocol for Housing Conditions Claims (England) sets after a tenant’s letter of claim: the letter is treated as received two days after its date, the landlord should reply within 20 working days of that (paras 6.2 and 7.2(a)), the inspection should follow within 20 working days of the reply (para 7.4(a)), the expert’s report or agreed schedule within 10 working days of the inspection (para 7.4(b) and (d)), and the landlord’s full response within 20 working days of receiving it (para 6.3). Give the later dates as they happen to see each next date and whether each step was on time. It counts working days, leaving out weekends and bank holidays in England and Wales. The protocol calls these long stops, and they can be changed by agreement (para 9). Wales has its own protocol, with the same periods for the reply, the inspection and the report.

NameTypeReqDescription
asAtstring–Work it out as at this date instead of today in England (YYYY-MM-DD).
inspectionDatestring–The day the property was inspected (by a single joint expert, or at a joint inspection), if it has been. Needs replyDate (YYYY-MM-DD).
letterDatestringyesThe date written on the letter of claim, not the day the landlord got it (YYYY-MM-DD).
replyDatestring–The day the landlord replied to the letter of claim, if it has (YYYY-MM-DD).
reportReceivedDatestring–The day the expert’s report or the agreed schedule arrived, if it has. Needs inspectionDate (YYYY-MM-DD).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

check_awaabs_law_deadlines ~429

Works out the dates Awaab’s Law gives a council or housing association in England (the Hazards in Social Housing (Prescribed Requirements) (England) Regulations 2025, SI 2025/1042) to deal with damp or mould: investigate it, give the tenant a written summary, finish any safety work and start any further work. It counts working days from the day after the landlord found out, leaving out weekends and bank holidays in England and Wales, and says whether each date has passed. For an emergency hazard it gives the 24-hour rule; for other hazards it gives the position on Awaab’s Law Phase 2 from the site’s legal register. It says when Awaab’s Law does not apply (private landlords, Wales, shared ownership and long leases). It does not decide whether a hazard is significant, and a missed date is a dated failure, not an entitlement to anything.

NameTypeReqDescription
asAtstring–Work it out as at this date instead of today in England (YYYY-MM-DD).
awareOnstring–Damp or mould: the day the landlord found out, usually the day it was first reported (in writing, if it was) (YYYY-MM-DD).
hazardstring–For a council or housing association: "damp_mould", "emergency" (something putting someone in immediate danger, such as a gas leak or exposed live wiring) or "other" (another problem, such as a broke…
investigatedOnstring–Damp or mould: the day the landlord’s investigation finished, if it has. Leave out if it has not investigated, or if not known (YYYY-MM-DD).
landlordstringyesWho the landlord is: "council" or "housing_association" (in England), "private" (a private landlord or letting agent), "wales" (any landlord in Wales) or "ownership" (the tenant owns a share, or has…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_repair_letter_template ~374

Gives the text of a letter for a tenant to send their landlord, with [bracketed] gaps to fill in: "first-report" to report a repair in writing for the first time, "chaser" when it was reported and nothing has happened, "complaint" to make a formal complaint under the landlord’s complaints procedure (citing section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in England, or sections 91 and 92 of the Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016 in Wales), or "awaabs-law" to ask a council or housing association in England to deal with a hazard under Awaab’s Law. The Awaab’s Law letter is given only to a tenant of a council or housing association in England with a tenancy (not a licence, shared ownership or a long lease). It never takes the tenant’s name, address or details: fill in the gaps with them. The letters state facts and make a request; they promise no outcome.

NameTypeReqDescription
countrystring–Where the home is: "england" (default) or "wales". Wales has its own housing law, and the complaint letter cites a different Act.
landlordstring–"social" for a council or housing association (default), or "private" for a private landlord or letting agent.
templatestringyesWhich letter: "first-report", "chaser", "complaint" or "awaabs-law".
tenurestring–How the tenant occupies the home: "tenancy", "licence" (some supported or temporary housing), "shared_or_lease" (shared ownership or a long lease) or "unsure" (default). Only a tenancy gets the Awaab…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_housing_repair_help ~220

Answers tenants’ questions about repairs, damp and mould and disrepair in rented homes in England and Wales, from RemedyBridge’s published guides: what a landlord must repair and how quickly, Awaab’s Law, section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and fitness for human habitation, reporting repairs, landlord complaints and the Housing Ombudsman, free helplines and who each one is for, Environmental Health and HHSRS, withholding rent, eviction after a complaint, the pre-action protocol and evidence. It searches the quick answer and the questions and answers of every guide, and a glossary of 54 housing terms, and returns each answer with the link to its page. Use it for "what is", "who is responsible", "how long" and "what can I do" questions. It does not assess anyone’s situation.

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyesThe question or term in plain words, e.g. "how long does my landlord have to fix a leak" or "section 11".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the RemedyBridge free tools for tenants MCP server?

RemedyBridge free tools for tenants is a hosted endpoint at https://remedybridge.co.uk/mcp/, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · remedybridge.co.uk

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http uk-co-remedybridge-housing-repair-tools 'https://remedybridge.co.uk/mcp/'
Common questions

What is the RemedyBridge free tools for tenants MCP server?

RemedyBridge free tools for tenants is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as uk.co.remedybridge/housing-repair-tools. Free tools for UK tenants: Awaab's Law and complaint deadlines, repair letters, housing help search. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://remedybridge.co.uk/mcp/).

Is the RemedyBridge free tools for tenants MCP server safe to use?

RemedyBridge free tools for tenants scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the RemedyBridge free tools for tenants MCP server expose?

RemedyBridge free tools for tenants exposes 6 tools: search_housing_repair_help, check_awaabs_law_deadlines, calculate_landlord_complaint_deadlines, calculate_pre_action_protocol_timetable, get_repair_letter_template, build_evidence_checklist. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,997 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the RemedyBridge free tools for tenants MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to RemedyBridge free tools for tenants without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the RemedyBridge free tools for tenants MCP server still maintained?

RemedyBridge free tools for tenants is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.