Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

SuggestionBox.tips

REMOTE · SUGGESTIONBOX.TIPS

Leave a private suggestion, problem or compliment for any business. Only the business reads it.

+4 this week 84 Trust /100

Last scanned (3 hours ago)

Scores higher than 89% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category CRM and Sales

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 254 tokens (~127/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management77
  • Stability observed for 23 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage95
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 86% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1
    • Tool “find_business” changed its title: Find a business or organization on SuggestionBox → Find a business or organization on SuggestionBox.tips cosmetic

    1 cosmetic change on this day. Switch on “Show cosmetic changes” to see it.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://suggestionbox.tips/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=suggestionbox.tips CN=Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36,O=Sectigo Limited,C=GB 20 Dec 2025 20 Dec 2026 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 17ba98767a26273a09dc6eb4e06a0fd9
SANs: suggestionbox.tips, www.suggestionbox.tips
CN=Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36,O=Sectigo Limited,C=GB (CA) CN=Sectigo Public Server Authentication Root R46,O=Sectigo Limited,C=GB 22 Mar 2021 21 Mar 2036 RSA 3072 SHA384-RSA 397a66cc2756362e0daa87ca6eabe3b1
CN=Sectigo Public Server Authentication Root R46,O=Sectigo Limited,C=GB (CA) CN=USERTrust RSA Certification Authority,O=The USERTRUST Network,L=Jersey City,ST=New Jersey,C=US 22 Mar 2021 18 Jan 2038 RSA 4096 SHA384-RSA d27fbbc1de359e5216ad6149586099c4

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of suggestionbox.tips. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
tips. present 47965 8 Verified
suggestionbox.tips. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=15768000
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options SAMEORIGIN
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(self), geolocation=(self), payment=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://suggestionbox.tips/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://suggestionbox.tips/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://suggestionbox.tips/mcp
MCP tools · 2 exposed · ~206 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
find_business ~50

Look up whether a business or organization already has a suggestion box on SuggestionBox.tips. Use before leaving a message when unsure which one the user means.

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyesName or website.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

leave_message ~156

Drop the user's feedback (a suggestion, a problem or a compliment) into the private suggestion box of any business or organization on SuggestionBox.tips. Private between the user and them. Confirm the wording with the user before sending. Give the website when you know it; otherwise its name and city.

NameTypeReqDescription
businessstringyesIts website (best) or its name.
citystring–City, needed when there is no website.
emailstring–Optional. The user's email, only if they want to hear back.
kindstringyes–
refstring–Optional order or booking number the message is about.
textstringyesThe message, in the user's words.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the SuggestionBox.tips MCP server?

SuggestionBox.tips is a hosted endpoint at https://suggestionbox.tips/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · suggestionbox.tips

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http tips-suggestionbox-suggestionbox 'https://suggestionbox.tips/mcp'
Common questions

What is the SuggestionBox.tips MCP server?

SuggestionBox.tips is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as tips.suggestionbox/suggestionbox. Leave a private suggestion, problem or compliment for any business. Only the business reads it. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://suggestionbox.tips/mcp).

Is the SuggestionBox.tips MCP server safe to use?

SuggestionBox.tips scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the SuggestionBox.tips MCP server expose?

SuggestionBox.tips exposes 2 tools: find_business, leave_message. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 206 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the SuggestionBox.tips MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to SuggestionBox.tips without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the SuggestionBox.tips MCP server still maintained?

SuggestionBox.tips is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.