Cursu Job Age Checker
REMOTE · CURSU.AI
When a job was first posted and whether it is still open, from the employer's own job link.
Available components
Last scanned (18 hours ago)
Scores higher than 74% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 22 Oct 2026.
Category CRM and Sales
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability72
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 315 tokens (~315/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management40
- Stability observed for 12 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.07 ▲ functional
- 10 Oct 26 71
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 22 Oct 2026 · Probed https://cursu.ai/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=cursu.ai | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 28 Sept 2026 | 27 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5381eb9e0526e50b70e24313d2d13c2390f |
| SANs: cursu.ai | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of cursu.ai. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| ai. | present | 3799 | 8 | Verified |
| cursu.ai. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://*.firebaseapp.com https://*.googleapis.com https://apis.google.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google.com/recaptcha/ https://www.gstatic.com/recaptcha/; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; img-src 'self' data: https://*.googleusercontent.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; connect-src 'self' https://*.googleapis.com https://*.firebaseio.com https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com https://accounts.google.com https://*.google-analytics.com; frame-src 'self' https://*.firebaseapp.com https://accounts.google.com https://www.google.com/recaptcha/ https://recaptcha.google.com/recaptcha/; object-src 'none'; |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://cursu.ai/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://cursu.ai/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://cursu.ai/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_job_posting_age Check when a job was posted ~263
Find out when a job posting was first published and whether it is still open, from the company's own job link (Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, SmartRecruiters, Workday, Workable, Recruitee, BambooHR, Teamtailor, JazzHR, Breezy HR, Personio, Oracle Recruiting Cloud, iCIMS, UKG Pro Recruiting, Rippling, Dayforce, ADP Workforce Now, Eightfold; job pages on Jobvite, Pinpoint, Paylocity, Taleo Business Edition, JOIN, softgarden, Homerun; or any careers page with JobPosting structured data). Greenhouse, Recruitee and UKG also give a last-updated date. Use it when someone asks how old a job listing is, whether it is still accepting applications, or whether it might be a "ghost job": the dates are evidence for that question, but they show age and status, not whether the company intends to hire. LinkedIn and Indeed links are refused; pass the employer's apply link instead. Free, no account; by Cursu (cursu.ai).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | string | yes | The job posting's URL on the employer's careers site or ATS, starting with https://. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ageDays | integer|null | – | – |
| checkedAt | string | yes | ISO time of the check (results are cached for up to 24 hours). |
| company | string|null | – | – |
| confidence | string | yes | – |
| dateSource | string | yes | – |
| firstPosted | string|null | – | First-published date, YYYY-MM-DD (UTC). |
| lastUpdated | string|null | – | Last-updated date, YYYY-MM-DD (UTC); Greenhouse, Recruitee and UKG only. |
| link | string | yes | This result on cursu.ai. |
| source | string | yes | Where the dates came from: the ATS name, "the <ATS> job page" for a page read, or "the company's job page". |
| status | string | yes | – |
| title | string|null | – | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the Cursu Job Age Checker MCP server?
Cursu Job Age Checker is a hosted endpoint at https://cursu.ai/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · cursu.ai
claude mcp add --transport http ai-cursu-job-age-checker 'https://cursu.ai/mcp'
What is the Cursu Job Age Checker MCP server?
Cursu Job Age Checker is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as ai.cursu/job-age-checker. When a job was first posted and whether it is still open, from the employer's own job link. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://cursu.ai/mcp).
Is the Cursu Job Age Checker MCP server safe to use?
Cursu Job Age Checker scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Cursu Job Age Checker MCP server expose?
Cursu Job Age Checker exposes 1 tool: check_job_posting_age. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 263 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Cursu Job Age Checker MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Cursu Job Age Checker without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Cursu Job Age Checker MCP server still maintained?
Cursu Job Age Checker is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.