Taplid
NPM · @TAPLID/MCP · SCANNED SEP 20
Audit AI responses and artifacts with ALLOW, REVIEW, or BLOCK decisions and trust scores.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security98
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 37 of 110 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency32
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- License check failed: the license (UNLICENSED) isn't a recognized OSI-approved license. See how to fix → Fail
- Actively maintained (last published 49 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability72
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 263 tokens (~87/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
- Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the Taplid MCP server?
Taplid runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @taplid/mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · @taplid/mcp
claude mcp add taplid-taplid -- npx -y @taplid/mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"taplid-taplid": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@taplid/mcp"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"taplid-taplid": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@taplid/mcp"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add taplid-taplid -- npx -y @taplid/mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"taplid-taplid": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"@taplid/mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add taplid-taplid --command npx --arg -y --arg @taplid/mcp
mcp_servers:
taplid-taplid:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "@taplid/mcp"] {
"McpServers": {
"taplid-taplid": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"@taplid/mcp"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add taplid-taplid -t stdio -c npx -a -y @taplid/mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"taplid-taplid": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@taplid/mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 14 Sept 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- 13 Sept 26 +1
- Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
- 11 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/@taplid/mcp@1.0.1
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 110 packages
| Packages resolved | 110 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 36 |
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
taplid_audit ~103
Use this before trusting, applying, merging, sending, or acting on an AI-generated artifact. Suitable for code reviews, implementation plans, PR reviews, generated technical reports, proposed code changes, and other structured AI outputs. Returns ALLOW / REVIEW / BLOCK with a 0-100 trust score and a structured summary.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| auditMode | string | – | – |
| context | string | – | – |
| prompt | string | – | – |
| response | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
taplid_get_audit ~54
Retrieve a previously persisted Taplid audit by auditId. This is anonymous/shareable retrieval: no API key is required because the auditId is the unguessable share token.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| auditId | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
taplid_verify_audit ~106
Verify a Taplid audit attestation. Provide exactly one of `auditId` (re-fetches the persisted public result and checks the ES256 signature, issuer, signed fields and result hash) or `token` (a signed ES256 attestation JWT; checks signature, issuer and audience only — returns "warning" because no result is available to hash-check). Anonymous: no API key required.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| auditId | string | – | – |
| token | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the Taplid MCP server?
Taplid is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.taplid/taplid. Audit AI responses and artifacts with ALLOW, REVIEW, or BLOCK decisions and trust scores. This page covers its npm package (@taplid/mcp).
Is the Taplid MCP server safe to use?
Taplid scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Taplid MCP server expose?
Taplid exposes 3 tools: taplid_audit, taplid_get_audit, taplid_verify_audit. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 263 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Taplid MCP server still maintained?
Taplid is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Taplid MCP server under?
Taplid declares the UNLICENSED licence, which is not on the OSI-approved list. Read the terms before using it at work, and note this covers the source only, not the cost of any service it calls.