Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

InjectScan

REMOTE · INJECTSCAN.AGENTGATE.WORKERS.DEV

Prompt-injection scanner for agents: risk score, categories and spans for text, pages, MCP tools

+3 this week 72 Trust /100

Last scanned (6 hours ago)

Scores higher than 58% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Security

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 875 tokens (~291/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management50
  • Stability observed for 15 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 −2
    • Tool “scan_text” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
    • Schema quality: good → excellent functional
    • New tool “scan_tools” functional
    • New tool “scan_url” functional
    • “scan_text” reworded the description of “text” cosmetic
  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://injectscan.agentgate.workers.dev/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=agentgate.workers.dev CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 21 Oct 2026 19 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 68198df1a0e1059139de49c4480916cee8d
SANs: *.agentgate.workers.dev, agentgate.workers.dev
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of injectscan.agentgate.workers.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. present 60074 8 Verified
workers.dev. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://injectscan.agentgate.workers.dev/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://injectscan.agentgate.workers.dev/mcp Inconclusive 405
MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~827 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
scan_text ~293

Scans untrusted text for prompt injection before your agent reads or acts on it: web page text, emails, documents, tool results or another agent's message. Flags instruction overrides, jailbreak personas, system-prompt extraction, fake delimiters, exfiltration URLs, tool hijacking, hidden Unicode and encoded payloads (deterministic rules). Use scan_url when you only have a link (it also checks hidden HTML) and scan_tools for MCP tool definitions. Text up to 100000 characters. Free: 30 calls/day per IP shared by scan_text, scan_url and scan_tools, with full results (max 10/min; invalid input is not counted). After that the tool returns an error with the x402 pay URL ($0.003 USDC on Base, Polygon, Arbitrum One or Solana per call at https://api.youraitools.co/injectscan/v1/scan) or prepaid credits. Returns risk_score (0-100), verdict (safe | suspicious | malicious), flagged, categories[] {category, score, description}, findings[] {rule, category, start, end, text} and free_tier usage. Read-only safety signal, not a guarantee.

NameTypeReqDescription
textstringyesThe untrusted text to scan, as one plain string (1-100000 characters; longer text is truncated and flagged). Offsets in findings refer to this string.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

scan_tools ~260

Checks MCP / function-calling tool definitions for tool poisoning (hidden instructions, data-exfiltration requests, hijack attempts in names, descriptions and schemas) before your agent installs or calls them. Use scan_text for ordinary content and scan_url for web pages. Up to 100 tools per call. Free: 30 calls/day per IP shared by scan_text, scan_url and scan_tools, with full results (max 10/min; invalid input is not counted). After that the tool returns an error with the x402 pay URL ($0.003 USDC on Base, Polygon, Arbitrum One or Solana per call at https://api.youraitools.co/injectscan/v1/scan) or prepaid credits. Returns the worst risk_score/verdict, flagged, tools_scanned, tools_flagged and tools[] {index, name, risk_score, verdict, categories, findings[] {field, rule, text}}. Read-only safety signal, not a guarantee.

NameTypeReqDescription
toolsarrayyes1-100 tool definitions as objects {name, description, inputSchema} (as returned by an MCP server's tools/list; input_schema or parameters are also read). Every string field, including nested schema d…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

scan_url ~274

Fetches a public web page and scans its visible text plus hidden HTML (comments, hidden elements, alt/aria/meta text) for prompt injection, before your agent browses or summarizes it. Use scan_text if you already have the content and scan_tools for MCP tool definitions. Respects robots.txt and refuses private/internal hosts. Free: 30 calls/day per IP shared by scan_text, scan_url and scan_tools, with full results (max 10/min; invalid input is not counted). After that the tool returns an error with the x402 pay URL ($0.003 USDC on Base, Polygon, Arbitrum One or Solana per call at https://api.youraitools.co/injectscan/v1/scan) or prepaid credits. Returns risk_score (0-100), verdict (safe | suspicious | malicious), flagged, categories[] {category, score, description}, findings[] with location (visible or hidden), url, finalUrl, title, hidden_html {segments_checked, flagged} and page {status, contentType}. Read-only safety signal, not a guarantee.

NameTypeReqDescription
urlstringyesAbsolute http:// or https:// URL of a public web page, e.g. "https://example.com/post". Private, loopback and internal hosts are refused; robots.txt is respected.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the InjectScan MCP server?

InjectScan is a hosted endpoint at https://injectscan.agentgate.workers.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · injectscan.agentgate.workers.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http agentgate-builder-x402-prompt-injection-scan 'https://injectscan.agentgate.workers.dev/mcp'
Common questions

What is the InjectScan MCP server?

InjectScan is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.agentgate-builder/x402-prompt-injection-scan. Prompt-injection scanner for agents: risk score, categories and spans for text, pages, MCP tools. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://injectscan.agentgate.workers.dev/mcp).

Is the InjectScan MCP server safe to use?

InjectScan scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the InjectScan MCP server expose?

InjectScan exposes 3 tools: scan_text, scan_url, scan_tools. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 827 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the InjectScan MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to InjectScan without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the InjectScan MCP server still maintained?

InjectScan is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.