AI Certificates
REMOTE · AICERTIFICATES.STUDY · SCANNED SEP 20
Practice questions for the four Claude certifications. The assistant never sees the key.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 4 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 848 tokens (~169/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management87
- Stability observed for 26 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the AI Certificates MCP server?
AI Certificates is a hosted endpoint at https://aicertificates.study/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · aicertificates.study
claude mcp add --transport http study-aicertificates-practice-exams 'https://aicertificates.study/api/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"study-aicertificates-practice-exams": {
"url": "https://aicertificates.study/api/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"study-aicertificates-practice-exams": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://aicertificates.study/api/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.study-aicertificates-practice-exams] url = "https://aicertificates.study/api/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"study-aicertificates-practice-exams": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://aicertificates.study/api/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add study-aicertificates-practice-exams --url 'https://aicertificates.study/api/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
study-aicertificates-practice-exams:
url: "https://aicertificates.study/api/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"study-aicertificates-practice-exams": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://aicertificates.study/api/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add study-aicertificates-practice-exams -t streamable-http -u 'https://aicertificates.study/api/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"study-aicertificates-practice-exams": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://aicertificates.study/api/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 19 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 −1
- Tool “my_progress” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 146 → 169 ▼ functional
- “get_practice_question” added an optional parameter “focus” cosmetic
- 15 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 7 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://aicertificates.study/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=*.aicertificates.study | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 24 Aug 2026 | 22 Nov 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 53cd132c47feb690b0fdccfd0f963203cc3 |
| SANs: *.aicertificates.study, aicertificates.study | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of aicertificates.study. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| study. | present | 61795 | 8 | Verified |
| aicertificates.study. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://aicertificates.study/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://aicertificates.study/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://aicertificates.study/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_answer Check an answer and explain every option ~105
Grades the user's choice and returns an explanation for EVERY option, including the ones they did not pick. On this exam two options are frequently defensible and only one is credited, so the reasons the wrong options lose are the part worth teaching.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| exam | string | yes | Exam slug. |
| question_id | string | yes | The id from get_practice_question. |
| selected | array | yes | Option letters the user chose, e.g. ["B"] or ["B","D"]. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_practice_question Get a practice question ~186
Returns one original practice question with its options and no answer key. Present it to the user and let them choose before calling check_answer. Pass every id already served in exclude_ids — this server is stateless and remembers nothing.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | string | – | Optional domain id (e.g. "d3") to drill one area. Domain ids come from list_exams. |
| exam | string | yes | Exam slug from list_exams. |
| exclude_ids | array | – | Question ids already served in this session, so they are not repeated. |
| focus | string | – | Optional ordering by how everyone else answers these questions: "hardest" serves the highest crowd miss rates first, "traps" serves the questions most people get wrong the SAME way — a shared misconc… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_exams List Claude certification exams ~42
The Claude certifications covered here, with exam codes, item counts, fees and the full domain list with published weights. Call this first to get valid exam slugs.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
my_progress See what this person has answered so far ~132
Their recorded history for one exam, broken down by blueprint domain with the weakest first, plus how their misses compare with everyone else's on the same free-form questions. Call this at the start of a study session to decide what to drill, and after a run of questions to show what moved. It names the domain to pass to get_practice_question, and when their misses follow the crowd's favorite wrong answers it says to drill those with focus: "traps". Only a signed-in account has history; anonymous callers are told so rather than shown zeros.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| exam | string | yes | Exam slug from list_exams. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
open_study Open a study session ~144
Open or resume the study page for an exam, optionally focused on a domain or a sub-objective. Use this when someone asks to study rather than to be quizzed in chat: the page gives them a visible question they answer themselves, and once it is open a richer set of tools appears for reading and steering that screen. Returns the URL; a browser agent should navigate there.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | string | – | Optional blueprint domain, e.g. "d3". |
| exam | string | yes | Exam slug from list_exams. |
| sub_objective | string | – | Optional concept, e.g. "d1.5". Ids are per-exam. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the AI Certificates MCP server?
AI Certificates is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as study.aicertificates/practice-exams. Practice questions for the four Claude certifications. The assistant never sees the key. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://aicertificates.study/api/mcp).
Is the AI Certificates MCP server safe to use?
AI Certificates scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the AI Certificates MCP server expose?
AI Certificates exposes 5 tools: list_exams, get_practice_question, my_progress, open_study, check_answer. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 609 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the AI Certificates MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to AI Certificates without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the AI Certificates MCP server still maintained?
AI Certificates is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.