Tracepay
REMOTE · TRACEPAY.AI · SCANNED SEP 22
Read-only payment state for USDC on Base/Solana (Bridge, Circle): completed, failed, or delayed.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability81
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 437 tokens (~145/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management53
- Stability observed for 16 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the Tracepay MCP server?
Tracepay is a hosted endpoint at https://tracepay.ai/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · tracepay.ai
claude mcp add --transport http soreniverson-trace 'https://tracepay.ai/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"soreniverson-trace": {
"url": "https://tracepay.ai/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"soreniverson-trace": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://tracepay.ai/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.soreniverson-trace] url = "https://tracepay.ai/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"soreniverson-trace": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://tracepay.ai/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add soreniverson-trace --url 'https://tracepay.ai/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
soreniverson-trace:
url: "https://tracepay.ai/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"soreniverson-trace": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://tracepay.ai/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add soreniverson-trace -t streamable-http -u 'https://tracepay.ai/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"soreniverson-trace": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://tracepay.ai/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 21 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 8 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 7 Sept 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 22 Sept 2026 · Probed https://tracepay.ai/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=tracepay.ai | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 5 Sept 2026 | 4 Dec 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 679cc3ee0eec1a9841353fb576ff7a050fa |
| SANs: tracepay.ai | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of tracepay.ai. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| ai. | present | 3799 | 8 | Verified |
| tracepay.ai. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://tracepay.ai/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://tracepay.ai/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://tracepay.ai/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_trace Get an existing trace ~56
Retrieve an existing Trace payment trace by its trace_id (tr_...), including the stage timeline. Read-only. Same normalized representation as trace_payment.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| trace_id | string | yes | Trace ID, e.g. "tr_abc123". |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_supported_systems List supported payment systems ~72
List what Trace supports and can do: assets (USDC), chains with public tracing (Base, Solana), providers requiring connected credentials (Bridge, Circle), and explicit capability flags (read-only; cannot send, retry, or sign). Call this when unsure whether a payment is in scope for trace_payment.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trace_payment Trace a payment ~309
Use this whenever you need to determine whether a supported stablecoin payment completed, failed, or is delayed — where the money currently is, who owns the next step, and what should happen next. Typical triggers: 'the recipient says the payment never arrived', 'this payout is stuck', 'did this transaction go through?'. Give it a Base transaction hash, Solana signature, Bridge transfer ID, Circle payment ID, or a Base/Solana wallet address (USDC). Trace correlates blockchain and provider evidence into one deterministic normalized state: completed/terminal flags, health, current stage and owner, an evidence-backed diagnosis code with a machine-readable suggested action and retry timing, and a knowledge model separating observed facts from inferences from what Trace cannot see (e.g. beneficiary bank credit — onchain finality never proves the recipient's bank credited funds; unknown never means failed). Public blockchain data works without authentication; provider-connected state requires an API key. If the user has no identifier, ask for a transaction hash, provider payment ID, or supported wallet address. Read-only: this tool never moves funds, retries payments, signs transactions, or guarantees beneficiary receipt — do not use it to send or swap anything. If a payment's state is unresolved, do NOT send a replacement payment; follow the returned warnings and suggested action instead.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Transaction hash, provider payment ID, or wallet address to trace. |
| input_type | string | – | Optional. Defaults to auto-detection. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the Tracepay MCP server?
Tracepay is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.soreniverson/trace. Read-only payment state for USDC on Base/Solana (Bridge, Circle): completed, failed, or delayed. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://tracepay.ai/mcp).
Is the Tracepay MCP server safe to use?
Tracepay scores 82 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Tracepay MCP server expose?
Tracepay exposes 3 tools: trace_payment, get_trace, list_supported_systems. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 437 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Tracepay MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Tracepay without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Tracepay MCP server still maintained?
Tracepay is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.