Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Veriko

NPM · @VERIKO-MX/MCP · SCANNED OCT 3

Valida y consulta transferencias SPEI mediante la API oficial de Veriko.

Available components

+4 this week 80 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 0 of 4 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to veriko-mx-labs/veriko-mcp). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 0 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability54
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 536 tokens (~107/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management33
  • Stability observed for 10 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Install

How do I install the Veriko MCP server?

Veriko runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @veriko-mx/mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @veriko-mx/mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add veriko-mx-labs-veriko -- npx -y @veriko-mx/mcp
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "veriko-mx-labs-veriko": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@veriko-mx/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "veriko-mx-labs-veriko": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@veriko-mx/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Codex CLI
codex mcp add veriko-mx-labs-veriko -- npx -y @veriko-mx/mcp
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "veriko-mx-labs-veriko": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "npx",
        "-y",
        "@veriko-mx/mcp"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add veriko-mx-labs-veriko --command npx --arg -y --arg @veriko-mx/mcp
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  veriko-mx-labs-veriko:
    command: "npx"
    args: ["-y", "@veriko-mx/mcp"]
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "veriko-mx-labs-veriko": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "npx",
      "Arguments": [
        "-y",
        "@veriko-mx/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add veriko-mx-labs-veriko -t stdio -c npx -a -y @veriko-mx/mcp
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "veriko-mx-labs-veriko": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@veriko-mx/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Oct 26 +16
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 2 Oct 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.27 → fail ▼ security
    • Schema quality: 96 → 107 ▼ functional
    • Package version: 0.1.7 → 0.1.9 functional
    • Package version: 0.1.7 → 0.1.8 functional
  • 1 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Sept 26 0
    • Package version: 0.1.6 → 0.1.7 functional
  • 29 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • Package version: 0.1.5 → 0.1.6 functional
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 27 Sept 26 +1
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.10 → unverified ▼ security
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
    • Package version: 0.1.4 → 0.1.5 functional
  • 26 Sept 26 +11
    • Known CVEs: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Dependency health: unverified → 1.00 ▲ functional
    • Package version: 0.1.3 → 0.1.4 functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 3 Oct 2026 · Analysed npm/@veriko-mx/mcp@0.1.9

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo veriko-mx-labs/veriko-mcp
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/veriko-mx-labs/veriko-mcp/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/tags/v0.1.9
Rekor log index 3051919208
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:9b2c5907a9347bfed29841bbf87a6a6878d0142957e77b7bb0e1523956e031446f85568684025bd3e2ebd0fb361fc35ab1d826b7a4b9112010550c007

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 4 packages
Packages resolved 4
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~485 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
veriko_download_cep ~43

Obtiene el comprobante oficial de Banxico en XML o PDF como recurso MCP.

NameTypeReqDescription
formatstring––
validationIdstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

veriko_get_validation ~40

Obtiene una validación y su ETag por identificador.

NameTypeReqDescription
ifNoneMatchstring––
validationIdstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

veriko_list_validations ~131

Lista validaciones con filtros y paginación.

NameTypeReqDescription
amountMaxnumber––
amountMinnumber––
bankstring––
batchIdinteger––
clientRefstring––
fromstring––
pageinteger––
perPageinteger––
playgroundboolean––
retryStatestring––
searchstring––
status–––
tostring––
typestring––
withDeletedboolean––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

veriko_validate_direct ~147

Valida datos de una transferencia contra el CEP de Banxico. Cada validación consume cuota del plan del usuario y se descuenta al aceptar la petición.

NameTypeReqDescription
asyncboolean––
claveRastreostring––
clientRefstring––
cuentaBeneficiariastring––
cuentasCandidatasarray––
emisorstring––
fechastringyes–
idempotencyKeystring––
monto–yes–
receptorstring––
receptorParticipante–––
referenciaNumericastring––
retryPolicyobject––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

veriko_validate_ocr ~124

Extrae y valida una transferencia desde una imagen, un PDF o una URL HTTPS. Cada validación consume cuota del plan del usuario y se descuenta al aceptar la petición.

NameTypeReqDescription
asyncboolean––
clientRefstring––
cuentaBeneficiariastring––
cuentasCandidatasarray––
idempotencyKeystring––
imageBase64string––
imageUrlstring––
retainImageboolean––
retryPolicyobject––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the Veriko MCP server?

Veriko is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.veriko-mx-labs/veriko. Valida y consulta transferencias SPEI mediante la API oficial de Veriko. This page covers its npm package (@veriko-mx/mcp).

Is the Veriko MCP server safe to use?

Veriko scores 80 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 3 October 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Veriko MCP server expose?

Veriko exposes 5 tools: veriko_validate_direct, veriko_validate_ocr, veriko_list_validations, veriko_get_validation, veriko_download_cep. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 485 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Veriko MCP server still maintained?

Veriko is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 3 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Veriko MCP server under?

Veriko declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.