io.github.selvatuple/revibe-mcp
NPM · REVIBE-MCP
Analyze any codebase — get architecture, file roles, execution flows, and agent context.
Available components
Last scanned (13 hours ago)
Scores higher than 62% of npm servers
Category Code Search and Documentation
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security81
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects zod 3.25.76, a direct dependency. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 30 of 93 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 233 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability75
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 507 tokens (~84/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 2 Nov 26 −1
- Stability: pass → 0.93 functional
- 27 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 26 Oct 26 −1
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 24 Oct 26 −5
- CVE-2023-54404 affects this package: high ▼ security
- Known CVEs: pass → fail ▼ security
- 20 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 19 Oct 26 −1
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 17 Oct 26 +2
- Stability: 0.87 → pass security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/revibe-mcp@0.1.1
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Vulnerabilities 1 finding
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5 | CVE-2023-54404 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →
Dependencies 93 packages
| Packages resolved | 93 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 30 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
analyze_repo ~110
Submit a GitHub repository for Revibe analysis. Analyzes architecture, file roles, execution flows, system design Q&A, and more. If no URL is provided, auto-detects from the current git remote. Analysis takes 3-7 minutes for most repos.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| github_url | string | – | GitHub repository URL (e.g. https://github.com/owner/repo). Auto-detected if empty. |
| reanalyze | boolean | – | Force re-analysis even if already analyzed. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_status ~33
Check the status of a Revibe analysis job.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| job_id | string | yes | The job ID returned from analyze_repo. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_agent_context ~79
Get the full agent context JSON for a completed analysis. This is a structured format optimized for AI agents, containing file index, dependency graph, architecture layers, call chains, constraints, design decisions, and database schema. Save the output to agent_context.json for persistent codebase understanding.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| job_id | string | yes | The job ID from analyze_repo. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_section ~189
Get a specific analysis section from a completed Revibe analysis. Available sections: - technical_architecture (or "architecture") — system layers, technologies, diagrams - file_roles — what each file does, importance, dependencies - system_design_qa — interview-style Q&A about design decisions - story_flow (or "execution_flows") — how the app starts up and handles requests - database_schema (or "database") — tables, relationships, ER diagrams - concepts_explanation (or "concepts") — key patterns and concepts used - modules — logical groupings of files - business_logic — core domain logic and rules - flow_implementation — detailed execution flow code traces
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| job_id | string | yes | The job ID from analyze_repo. |
| section | string | yes | Section name (e.g. "architecture", "file_roles", "system_design_qa"). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_summary ~49
Get a condensed summary of a completed Revibe analysis. Shows architecture pattern, language, file count, key modules, and available sections.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| job_id | string | yes | The job ID from analyze_repo. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
revibe_login ~47
Log in to Revibe via browser. Opens a browser window for authentication. After logging in and clicking Authorize, the API key is saved locally so all other Revibe tools work automatically.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the io.github.selvatuple/revibe-mcp server?
io.github.selvatuple/revibe-mcp runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y revibe-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · revibe-mcp
claude mcp add selvatuple-revibe-mcp -- npx -y revibe-mcp
What is the io.github.selvatuple/revibe-mcp server?
io.github.selvatuple/revibe-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.selvatuple/revibe-mcp. Analyze any codebase, get architecture, file roles, execution flows, and agent context. This page covers its npm package (revibe-mcp).
Is the io.github.selvatuple/revibe-mcp server safe to use?
io.github.selvatuple/revibe-mcp scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 1 known advisory against it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.selvatuple/revibe-mcp server expose?
io.github.selvatuple/revibe-mcp exposes 6 tools: revibe_login, analyze_repo, check_status, get_summary, get_section, get_agent_context. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 507 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.selvatuple/revibe-mcp server still maintained?
io.github.selvatuple/revibe-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.selvatuple/revibe-mcp server under?
io.github.selvatuple/revibe-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.