Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.shubhtoy/github-project-info

NPM · GITHUB-PROJECT-INFO-MCP · SCANNED SEP 20

Read public GitHub Projects v2 boards without auth — items, fields, story points, priority.

+1 this week 84 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security98
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 31 of 96 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 740 tokens (~148/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
  • Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Install

How do I install the io.github.shubhtoy/github-project-info MCP server?

io.github.shubhtoy/github-project-info runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y github-project-info-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · github-project-info-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add shubhtoy-github-project-info -- npx -y github-project-info-mcp
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "shubhtoy-github-project-info": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "github-project-info-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "shubhtoy-github-project-info": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "github-project-info-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Codex CLI
codex mcp add shubhtoy-github-project-info -- npx -y github-project-info-mcp
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "shubhtoy-github-project-info": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "npx",
        "-y",
        "github-project-info-mcp"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add shubhtoy-github-project-info --command npx --arg -y --arg github-project-info-mcp
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  shubhtoy-github-project-info:
    command: "npx"
    args: ["-y", "github-project-info-mcp"]
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "shubhtoy-github-project-info": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "npx",
      "Arguments": [
        "-y",
        "github-project-info-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add shubhtoy-github-project-info -t stdio -c npx -a -y github-project-info-mcp
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "shubhtoy-github-project-info": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "github-project-info-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 20 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Sept 26 −2
    • Stability: pass → 0.83 functional
  • 15 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 14 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 13 Sept 26 0
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail functional
  • 12 Sept 26 +1
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified functional
  • 10 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/github-project-info-mcp@0.1.3

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem npm

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 96 packages
Packages resolved 96
Stale 31
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~740 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_project_fields ~123

Get a public GitHub Projects (v2) board's field definitions — including single-select field option names/colors (e.g. Status: Todo/In Progress/Done) and saved views. Useful for resolving the option IDs found in list_project_items results to human-readable names. Currently only supported for user-owned projects (uses the same board-page data source as list_project_items for those).

NameTypeReqDescription
ownerstringyesGitHub username that owns the project
projectNumberintegeryesThe project number, e.g. 4 for .../projects/4

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_project_item ~259

Get full field data for a single item in a public GitHub Projects (v2) board — including custom fields (like Priority, Story Points) that list_project_items may not show, since that only returns the board's default-view columns while this returns every field defined on the project. Requires the project's numeric database ID (from get_project_metadata's `id` field — NOT `nodeId`, which does not work with this endpoint) and the item's numeric ID (from list_project_items). Pass owner and projectNumber too so custom field names and single-select option names (e.g. a Status ID resolved to "Done") can be resolved — omit them to get raw field IDs/option IDs instead, skipping an extra request. Uses an unofficial, undocumented GitHub endpoint — works today for public projects but is not a published API contract.

NameTypeReqDescription
itemIdintegeryesThe numeric item ID, from list_project_items
ownerstringGitHub username that owns the project, for resolving custom field/option names
projectIdintegeryesThe project's numeric database ID, from get_project_metadata's `id` field
projectNumberintegerThe project number, for resolving custom field/option names

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_project_metadata ~109

Get metadata (title, description, state, dates) for a public GitHub Projects (v2) board. Works unauthenticated for both user-owned and org-owned public projects.

NameTypeReqDescription
ownerstringyesGitHub username or organization name that owns the project
ownerTypestringyesWhether the project is owned by a personal GitHub user account or an organization
projectNumberintegeryesThe project number, e.g. 4 for .../projects/4

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_project_items ~166

List all items (issues/PRs/draft issues) in a public GitHub Projects (v2) board, including their status, custom field values, and other metadata. For org-owned projects this uses GitHub's official REST API. For user-owned projects, GitHub's official API requires authentication even for public projects, so this falls back to reading the public board page's embedded data — an unofficial method that could break if GitHub changes its page structure.

NameTypeReqDescription
ownerstringyesGitHub username or organization name that owns the project
ownerTypestringyesWhether the project is owned by a personal GitHub user account or an organization
projectNumberintegeryesThe project number, e.g. 4 for .../projects/4

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_user_projects ~83

List all public GitHub Projects (v2) boards owned by a user account. There is no official GitHub API for this (Projects aren't a Search API resource type, and the REST API requires already knowing a project number) — this reads the same project list shown on a user's profile page (the Projects tab).

NameTypeReqDescription
usernamestringyesGitHub username

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the io.github.shubhtoy/github-project-info MCP server?

io.github.shubhtoy/github-project-info is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.shubhtoy/github-project-info. Read public GitHub Projects v2 boards without auth, items, fields, story points, priority. This page covers its npm package (github-project-info-mcp).

Is the io.github.shubhtoy/github-project-info MCP server safe to use?

io.github.shubhtoy/github-project-info scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.shubhtoy/github-project-info MCP server expose?

io.github.shubhtoy/github-project-info exposes 5 tools: get_project_metadata, list_project_items, get_project_item, get_project_fields, list_user_projects. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 740 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.shubhtoy/github-project-info MCP server still maintained?

io.github.shubhtoy/github-project-info is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.shubhtoy/github-project-info MCP server under?

io.github.shubhtoy/github-project-info declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.