Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp

PYPI · ACMT001-MCP

MCP server for ISO 20022 acmt.001 account management message generation and validation.

Available components

+15 this week 96 Trust /100

Last scanned (23 hours ago)

Scores higher than 98% of PyPI servers

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Runs poetry.core.masonry.api at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • 4 of 48 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (Apache-2.0 OR MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 5 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability78
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2819 tokens (~352/item across 8 items; 7 tools + 1 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (43% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 29 Oct 26 +15
    • Stability: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • Schema quality: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • Package version: 0.0.14 → 0.0.15 functional
  • 28 Oct 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Package version: 0.0.13 → 0.0.14 functional
  • 26 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 25 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • Schema quality: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
    • Package version: 0.0.11 → 0.0.13 functional
  • 19 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 14 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/acmt001-mcp@0.0.15

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem pypi
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/tags/v0.0.15
Rekor log index 3565071713
Predicate type PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1
Subject digest sha256:b8c8d505823c797fa1785656a279381ab0c8b5a173477f0e10194c2d003ac17a

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend allowlisted poetry.core.masonry.api

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 48 packages
Packages resolved 48
Stale 3
No linked repository 1
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~2,729 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
generate_message ~564

Generate a validated ISO 20022 acmt XML message from in-memory records. This is the primary generation tool: pass account records you already hold in memory and receive an XSD-validated XML document; no file is written. Run ``validate_records`` first to surface record-level errors, and ``list_message_types`` to confirm the ``message_type`` string. Returns the validated XML document as a string, or an ``{"error": ...}`` payload (serialized) if generation fails. Args: message_type: A supported ISO 20022 acmt message type. records: One or more flat account records.

NameTypeReqDescription
message_typestringyesA supported ISO 20022 acmt message type, e.g. 'acmt.001.001.08' Account Opening Instruction. Must be exactly one of: 'acmt.001.001.08', 'acmt.002.001.08', 'acmt.003.001.08', 'acmt.005.001.06', 'acmt.…
recordsarrayyesOne or more flat account records, each a dict of field name -> value, from which the acmt XML is generated; run validate_records first to surface record-level errors.
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

get_input_schema ~480

Return the full JSON Schema for a message type's flat input record. Use this to learn every field, its type, and its constraints before assembling records, or to drive a form/UI. For just the required-field names use ``get_required_fields``; to actually check records against this schema use ``validate_records``. Args: message_type: A supported ISO 20022 acmt message type.

NameTypeReqDescription
message_typestringyesA supported ISO 20022 acmt message type, e.g. 'acmt.001.001.08' Account Opening Instruction. Must be exactly one of: 'acmt.001.001.08', 'acmt.002.001.08', 'acmt.003.001.08', 'acmt.005.001.06', 'acmt.…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_required_fields ~468

List only the required input field names for an acmt message type. Use this for a quick checklist of the mandatory columns before building account records. When you need full type/format constraints (not just which fields are required), call ``get_input_schema`` instead. Args: message_type: A supported ISO 20022 acmt message type.

NameTypeReqDescription
message_typestringyesA supported ISO 20022 acmt message type, e.g. 'acmt.001.001.08' Account Opening Instruction. Must be exactly one of: 'acmt.001.001.08', 'acmt.002.001.08', 'acmt.003.001.08', 'acmt.005.001.06', 'acmt.…
NameTypeReqDescription
resultarrayyes–

No examples provided.

list_message_types ~136

List every supported ISO 20022 acmt message type and its human name. Use this first, before any generation or validation call, to discover the exact ``message_type`` strings this server accepts (e.g. ``acmt.001.001.08`` Account Opening Instruction). Do not use it to fetch a type's fields or schema -- call ``get_required_fields`` or ``get_input_schema`` for that. Returns a list of ``{"message_type": ..., "name": ...}`` dictionaries, one per supported message type (e.g. ``acmt.001.001.08``).

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
resultarrayyes–

No examples provided.

validate_identifier ~189

Validate a single financial identifier (IBAN, BIC, or LEI). Use this for a one-off identifier check with a clear pass/fail. To validate identifiers embedded across a whole batch of account records, prefer ``validate_records`` rather than calling this per field. Returns ``{"kind": str, "value": str, "valid": bool}``. Args: kind: One of ``"iban"``, ``"bic"``, or ``"lei"`` (case-insensitive). value: The identifier value to check.

NameTypeReqDescription
kindstringyesThe financial identifier scheme to validate against (case-insensitive). Must be exactly one of: 'bic', 'iban', 'lei'.
valuestringyesThe identifier value to check, e.g. an IBAN, BIC/SWIFT code, or LEI; validated according to the given kind.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

validate_records ~550

Validate flat account records against a message type's input JSON Schema. Use this before ``generate_message`` to catch structural/type errors per record and get a row-by-row error report. This checks JSON-Schema shape only; to validate a single financial identifier in isolation use ``validate_identifier``. Returns a report ``{"valid": bool, "total": int, "valid_count": int, "errors": [...]}``. Args: message_type: A supported ISO 20022 acmt message type. records: One or more flat account records to validate.

NameTypeReqDescription
message_typestringyesA supported ISO 20022 acmt message type, e.g. 'acmt.001.001.08' Account Opening Instruction. Must be exactly one of: 'acmt.001.001.08', 'acmt.002.001.08', 'acmt.003.001.08', 'acmt.005.001.06', 'acmt.…
recordsarrayyesOne or more flat account records, each a dict of field name -> value; validated against the message type's input JSON Schema (see get_input_schema / get_required_fields).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

verify_lei_online ~342

Verify a LEI against the live GLEIF register (reaches the network). Unlike ``validate_identifier``, which checks an LEI's format and check digits entirely offline, this tool performs a live HTTP GET against the public GLEIF REST API (``api.gleif.org``) to confirm the LEI is actually registered and to return the registered entity's details. It therefore requires network access and is marked open-world. Requires the optional ``online`` extra (``pip install acmt001-mcp[online]``) for the ``httpx`` HTTP client; without it a graceful ``{"error": ...}`` is returned rather than raising. Returns a dict with the ``lei``, registered ``legal_name``, entity ``status``, ``country``, and registration ``registration_status``, ``initial_registration_date``, ``last_update_date`` and ``next_renewal_date``. On failure returns ``{"error": ...}``: an ``LEI not found`` error for an unregistered LEI (HTTP 404), or a ``GLEIF API unavailable`` error for any other non-200 response or a transport/connection error. Args: lei_code: A 20-character ISO 17442 Legal Entity Identifier.

NameTypeReqDescription
lei_codestringyesA 20-character ISO 17442 Legal Entity Identifier to look up in the live GLEIF register, e.g. '5493001KJTIIGC8Y1R12'. Use validate_identifier(kind='lei', ...) first for a purely offline check-digit/fo…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp server?

io.github.sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx acmt001-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · acmt001-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add sebastienrousseau-acmt001-mcp -- uvx acmt001-mcp
Common questions

What is the io.github.sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp server?

io.github.sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp. MCP server for ISO 20022 acmt.001 account management message generation and validation. This page covers its PyPI package (acmt001-mcp).

Is the io.github.sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp server safe to use?

io.github.sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp scores 96 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 4 November 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp server expose?

io.github.sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp exposes 7 tools: list_message_types, get_required_fields, get_input_schema, validate_records, validate_identifier, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 2,729 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp server still maintained?

io.github.sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp server under?

io.github.sebastienrousseau/acmt001-mcp declares the Apache-2.0 OR MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.