io.github.sebastienrousseau/reconcile-mcp
PYPI · RECONCILE-MCP · SCANNED SEP 20
Reconcile camt.053 statements vs expected pain.001 payments with explainable matching.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security50
- Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs poetry.core.masonry.api at install time, a recognised native-build step with no shell scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 0 of 33 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency48
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (Apache-2.0 OR MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 21 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability83
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 1163 tokens (~105/item across 11 items; 10 tools + 1 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management87
- Stability observed for 26 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 10 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 11 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the io.github.sebastienrousseau/reconcile-mcp server?
io.github.sebastienrousseau/reconcile-mcp runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx reconcile-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · reconcile-mcp
claude mcp add sebastienrousseau-reconcile-mcp -- uvx reconcile-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"sebastienrousseau-reconcile-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"reconcile-mcp"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"sebastienrousseau-reconcile-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"reconcile-mcp"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add sebastienrousseau-reconcile-mcp -- uvx reconcile-mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"sebastienrousseau-reconcile-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"uvx",
"reconcile-mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add sebastienrousseau-reconcile-mcp --command uvx --arg reconcile-mcp
mcp_servers:
sebastienrousseau-reconcile-mcp:
command: "uvx"
args: ["reconcile-mcp"] {
"McpServers": {
"sebastienrousseau-reconcile-mcp": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "uvx",
"Arguments": [
"reconcile-mcp"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add sebastienrousseau-reconcile-mcp -t stdio -c uvx -a reconcile-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"sebastienrousseau-reconcile-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"reconcile-mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 17 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 15 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 14 Sept 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 +12
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 10 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed pypi/reconcile-mcp@0.0.5
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | poetry.core.masonry.api |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 33 packages
| Packages resolved | 33 |
|---|---|
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
explain_match ~115
Score a single expected/observed pair and break down every signal (reference, amount, date, name). A tuning aid -- it explains the score even for pairs below the review threshold.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| expected | object | yes | One expected record. |
| observed | object | yes | One observed record. |
| options | – | – | Optional tuning object: 'abs_tol'/'rel_tol' (amount tolerance), 'date_window_days', 'high_threshold', 'review_threshold', 'currency_strict', 'enable_one_to_many', 'max_combination'. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
list_sandbox_scenarios ~39
List the built-in sandbox scenarios (test-mode fixtures). Each demonstrates one reconciliation outcome so you can try the flow with zero real data.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
load_sandbox_scenario ~53
Return the expected/observed inputs for one named sandbox scenario, so you can inspect or edit the fixture before reconciling.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | Scenario name, e.g. 'clean_match'. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
match_amounts_with_fx_drift Match amounts (FX drift) ~153
Compare two amounts in different currencies, converting one via a supplied FX rate and matching if the percentage difference is within tolerance. Uses exact decimal arithmetic.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| amount_a | number | yes | Amount denominated in currency_a. |
| amount_b | number | yes | Amount denominated in currency_b. |
| currency_a | string | yes | ISO 4217 code of amount_a. |
| currency_b | string | yes | ISO 4217 code of amount_b. |
| fx_rate | number | yes | Units of currency_a per one unit of currency_b (e.g. an EUR/USD quote of 1.08 is USD per EUR). |
| tolerance_pct | number | – | Max percentage difference still counted as a match. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
match_names_probabilistic Match names (probabilistic) ~106
Score two counterparty names with Jaro-Winkler similarity and report whether they match at a given threshold. Tolerant of legal-suffix drift, e.g. 'ACME Corp' vs 'ACME Corporation Inc'.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name_a | string | yes | First counterparty name. |
| name_b | string | yes | Second counterparty name. |
| threshold | number | – | Similarity in [0, 1] at or above which the pair is a match. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
normalize_camt053 ~62
Convert parsed camt.053 statement entries into canonical observed records ready to reconcile. Accepts a list of entries or a dict wrapping them under 'entries'/'transactions'/'statements'.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| document | – | yes | Parsed camt.053 document or entry list. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
normalize_pain001 ~59
Convert parsed pain.001 payment instructions into canonical expected records ready to reconcile. Accepts a list of transactions or a dict wrapping them under 'transactions'/'payments'/'records'.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| document | – | yes | Parsed pain.001 document or transaction list. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
reconcile ~242
Reconcile expected payments against observed bank-statement entries, returning exact matches, short/over payments, split settlements (one-to-many), batch credits (many-to-one) and unmatched residuals, each with an explainable score and reasons.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| expected | array | yes | List of canonical records. Each is an object with 'id' (string) and 'amount' (number) required, plus optional 'currency' (ISO 4217), 'date' (ISO-8601), 'counterparty' (name), 'reference' (remittance/… |
| observed | array | yes | List of canonical records. Each is an object with 'id' (string) and 'amount' (number) required, plus optional 'currency' (ISO 4217), 'date' (ISO-8601), 'counterparty' (name), 'reference' (remittance/… |
| options | – | – | Optional tuning object: 'abs_tol'/'rel_tol' (amount tolerance), 'date_window_days', 'high_threshold', 'review_threshold', 'currency_strict', 'enable_one_to_many', 'max_combination'. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
reconcile_many_to_many Reconcile many-to-many ~188
Match each statement/deposit to a disjoint subset of invoices whose amounts sum to it (bounded subset-sum solved as an integer program). Returns matched groups and the unmatched residuals on each side.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| invoices | array | yes | List of canonical records. Each is an object with 'id' (string) and 'amount' (number) required, plus optional 'currency' (ISO 4217), 'date' (ISO-8601), 'counterparty' (name), 'reference' (remittance/… |
| statements | array | yes | List of canonical records. Each is an object with 'id' (string) and 'amount' (number) required, plus optional 'currency' (ISO 4217), 'date' (ISO-8601), 'counterparty' (name), 'reference' (remittance/… |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
run_sandbox_scenario ~112
Load a named sandbox scenario and immediately reconcile it -- the one-call way to see a full, explainable result with zero setup. Great for a first run or a smoke test.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | Scenario name, e.g. 'month_end'. |
| options | – | – | Optional tuning object: 'abs_tol'/'rel_tol' (amount tolerance), 'date_window_days', 'high_threshold', 'review_threshold', 'currency_strict', 'enable_one_to_many', 'max_combination'. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.sebastienrousseau/reconcile-mcp server?
io.github.sebastienrousseau/reconcile-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.sebastienrousseau/reconcile-mcp. Reconcile camt.053 statements vs expected pain.001 payments with explainable matching. This page covers its PyPI package (reconcile-mcp).
Is the io.github.sebastienrousseau/reconcile-mcp server safe to use?
io.github.sebastienrousseau/reconcile-mcp scores 70 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.sebastienrousseau/reconcile-mcp server expose?
io.github.sebastienrousseau/reconcile-mcp exposes 10 tools: reconcile, explain_match, normalize_pain001, normalize_camt053, list_sandbox_scenarios, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,129 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.sebastienrousseau/reconcile-mcp server still maintained?
io.github.sebastienrousseau/reconcile-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.sebastienrousseau/reconcile-mcp server under?
io.github.sebastienrousseau/reconcile-mcp declares the Apache-2.0 OR MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.