scrapewright
REMOTE · SCRAPEWRIGHT.APP · 2 COMPONENTS
Give it a URL, get structured rows. A model writes the parser once; replays are free.
Available components
Last scanned (11 hours ago)
Scores higher than 76% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Web Scraping
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 5 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability72
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 552 tokens (~110/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage71
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 18 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 10 Oct 26 +3
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Oct 26 69
- Tool “extract_page” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- “extract_page” added an optional parameter “retry” cosmetic
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://scrapewright.app/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=scrapewright.app | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 3 Nov 2026 | 1 Feb 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 668ba5294cd6a8176127459ae5b7f54a395 |
| SANs: scrapewright.app | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of scrapewright.app. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| app. | present | 23684 | 8 | Verified |
| scrapewright.app. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://scrapewright.app/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://scrapewright.app/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://scrapewright.app/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
account ~19
Credits left and this month's usage for the key in use.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
crawl_site ~208
Walk a site and extract every item. Waits up to four minutes; a longer crawl returns a job_id to pass to crawl_status. `mode` picks how the items are found. "rows" (the default) reads every card on the listing itself and follows its pagination -- right for search results, categories and tables. "links" follows each card into its own page, for sites where an item has one. "like" starts from one example item page, given as `like_page`, and finds every other page shaped like it; pass `listing_url` as well when you know the stock or results page, because inferring it is the part that fails.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| fields | – | – | – |
| js | boolean | – | – |
| like_page | – | – | – |
| listing_url | string | yes | – |
| max_items | integer | – | – |
| mode | string | – | – |
| scroll | integer | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
crawl_status ~26
Fetch a crawl that outlived its call.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| job_id | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
detect_site ~38
Report what platform a site runs on and which strategy to use. Cheap; call it before a large job.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
extract_page ~138
Extract structured data from ONE page. ``fields`` declares your own schema, e.g. ["title", "salary:number", "tags:list"]; omit it for the product schema. First call on a new site compiles a recipe (300 credits); later calls replay it for 1 credit per row. A site nobody could read is remembered for a week and answered without calling the model, so re-reading a dead page costs nothing. `retry` asks anyway.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| fields | – | – | – |
| js | boolean | – | – |
| retry | boolean | – | – |
| url | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
How do I install the scrapewright MCP server?
scrapewright is a hosted endpoint at https://scrapewright.app/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · scrapewright.app
claude mcp add --transport http ozymandias-owens-2-scrapewright 'https://scrapewright.app/mcp'
What is the scrapewright MCP server?
scrapewright is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Ozymandias-Owens-2/scrapewright. Give it a URL, get structured rows. A model writes the parser once; replays are free. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://scrapewright.app/mcp).
Is the scrapewright MCP server safe to use?
scrapewright scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the scrapewright MCP server expose?
scrapewright exposes 5 tools: detect_site, extract_page, crawl_site, crawl_status, account. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 429 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the scrapewright MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to scrapewright without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the scrapewright MCP server still maintained?
scrapewright is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.