Woo Revenue Incident Graph
REMOTE · REVENUE-GRAPH.UTILITYHOUSE.XYZ · SCANNED SEP 20
Check WooCommerce checkout-change risk using public evidence and privacy-safe store signals.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security66
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability68
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 907 tokens (~226/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management50
- Stability observed for 15 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage96
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 86% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the Woo Revenue Incident Graph MCP server?
Woo Revenue Incident Graph is a hosted endpoint at https://revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz/mcp/registry, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz
claude mcp add --transport http tytutueh13-sudo-woo-revenue-incident-graph 'https://revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz/mcp/registry'
{
"mcpServers": {
"tytutueh13-sudo-woo-revenue-incident-graph": {
"url": "https://revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz/mcp/registry"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"tytutueh13-sudo-woo-revenue-incident-graph": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz/mcp/registry"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.tytutueh13-sudo-woo-revenue-incident-graph] url = "https://revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz/mcp/registry"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"tytutueh13-sudo-woo-revenue-incident-graph": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz/mcp/registry",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add tytutueh13-sudo-woo-revenue-incident-graph --url 'https://revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz/mcp/registry' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
tytutueh13-sudo-woo-revenue-incident-graph:
url: "https://revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz/mcp/registry" {
"McpServers": {
"tytutueh13-sudo-woo-revenue-incident-graph": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz/mcp/registry"
}
}
} assistant mcp add tytutueh13-sudo-woo-revenue-incident-graph -t streamable-http -u 'https://revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz/mcp/registry'
{
"mcpServers": {
"tytutueh13-sudo-woo-revenue-incident-graph": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz/mcp/registry"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 +2
- DNSSEC: fail → pass ▲ security
- 10 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 7 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 6 Sept 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz/mcp/registry
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=utilityhouse.xyz | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 3 Sept 2026 | 2 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | b2bd0ea9aa5662bd0e95ade0cb31b1a6 |
| SANs: utilityhouse.xyz, revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz, *.revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| xyz. | present | 3599, 18130 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| utilityhouse.xyz. | present | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz/mcp/registry | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz/mcp/registry | Inconclusive | 405 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_checkout_change_risk Is this change likely to break checkout? ~168
Answers: is a change to this store's checkout or payment path known to have broken revenue elsewhere — before it is applied, or when explaining a change that was already made? Checks a component and version against public release and issue evidence scoped to the money path (payment capture, order status transitions, gateway webhooks, wallet checkout), not to general plugin update safety. With no component named, checks every commerce change this store has made recently. Says `unknown` when nothing independent is on record — an absence of reports is not a safety record, and is reported as the absence it is. Free.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| component | string | – | e.g. "plugin:woocommerce-gateway-stripe". Omit to check this store's own recent changes. |
| to_version | string | – | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| billable | boolean | yes | – |
| checked | array | yes | – |
| price_micros | integer | yes | – |
| source | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
diagnose_revenue_incident Why did this store's checkout revenue break? ~259
Answers: what most likely broke this store's checkout or payment path, what argues against each explanation, and how to tell whether a fix actually held. Joins the store's own privacy-safe signals — order status over time, order-status transitions, order-note reason codes, gateway and webhook health, scheduler backlog, checkout page health, recent plugin/theme/core changes — against public release and issue evidence, on one timeline. Every answer reports which signal families this store could and could not report, because a family that cannot be collected is not a family that is fine. Returns up to three ranked hypotheses, each with the observations behind it, independent public sources where they exist, counterevidence, what remains unknown, safe next steps, and a verification plan. Returns `abstained` and charges nothing when the snapshot is stale, coverage is thin, or the signals do not support any cause — an unsupported guess during an outage is worse than no answer. Free while in beta. Call get_checkout_health_snapshot first.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| symptom | string | – | What the merchant reports. Use "unknown" rather than guessing. |
| window_seconds | integer | – | Window in seconds. Default 86400 (24h), maximum 604800 (7d). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| abstained | object|null | yes | – |
| billable | boolean | yes | – |
| coverage | object | yes | – |
| data_freshness | string | yes | – |
| failure_pattern | string | yes | – |
| failure_pattern_reasoning | array | yes | – |
| hypotheses | array | yes | – |
| price_micros | integer | yes | – |
| symptom | string | yes | – |
| timeline | array | yes | – |
| window | object | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_checkout_health_snapshot Is this store's revenue path healthy right now? ~162
Answers: is anything wrong with this connected WooCommerce store's checkout and payment path right now, and is a full diagnosis worth running? Free, always. Returns order counts by status with the change across the window, gateway/webhook/scheduler health, checkout page health, how many recent commerce changes there were, which signal families this store can and cannot report, and how fresh the underlying data is. Call this FIRST — it is cheap, and `diagnosis_recommended` tells you whether the expensive call would have anything to work with. It returns no customer, order, or payment identifier because the store never sends any.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| window_seconds | integer | – | Window in seconds. Default 86400 (24h), maximum 604800 (7d). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| collected_at | integer|null | yes | – |
| connected | boolean | yes | – |
| coverage | object | yes | – |
| data_freshness | string | yes | – |
| diagnosis_recommended | boolean | yes | – |
| error_fingerprints | integer | yes | – |
| gateway_summary | object | yes | – |
| order_counts | object | yes | – |
| paid_order_change_pct | integer|null | yes | Change in paid orders across the window; null when there is too little data to compare. |
| reason | string | yes | – |
| recent_changes | integer | yes | – |
| scheduler_overdue | integer | yes | – |
| webhook_summary | object | yes | – |
No examples provided.
verify_revenue_recovery Did the fix actually hold? ~152
Answers: after a change was made, did this store's revenue signals actually recover? Compares the window before a stated change against the window since: paid vs pending vs failed order mix, webhook failure counts, and gateway availability. Returns `resolved`, `improving`, `still_failing`, or `unknown` — and `unknown` when too little new data has arrived to tell, which is free. A quiet ten minutes is not a recovery. Free while in beta.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| change_applied_at | integer | yes | Epoch ms when the fix was applied. |
| window_seconds | integer | – | Window in seconds. Default 86400 (24h), maximum 604800 (7d). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| after | object|null | yes | – |
| before | object|null | yes | – |
| billable | boolean | yes | – |
| new_regressions | array | yes | – |
| price_micros | integer | yes | – |
| reason | string | yes | – |
| status | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
What is the Woo Revenue Incident Graph MCP server?
Woo Revenue Incident Graph is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.tytutueh13-sudo/woo-revenue-incident-graph. Check WooCommerce checkout-change risk using public evidence and privacy-safe store signals. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://revenue-graph.utilityhouse.xyz/mcp/registry).
Is the Woo Revenue Incident Graph MCP server safe to use?
Woo Revenue Incident Graph scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Woo Revenue Incident Graph MCP server expose?
Woo Revenue Incident Graph exposes 4 tools: get_checkout_health_snapshot, diagnose_revenue_incident, check_checkout_change_risk, verify_revenue_recovery. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 741 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Woo Revenue Incident Graph MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Woo Revenue Incident Graph without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Woo Revenue Incident Graph MCP server still maintained?
Woo Revenue Incident Graph is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.