Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

BTCDecoded Intelligence

REMOTE · MCP.BTCDECODED.ORG

Cited Bitcoin coordination record search (~783k). Lightning. MCP. Not prices/chain analytics.

−1 this week 82 Trust /100

Last scanned (20 hours ago)

Scores higher than 85% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category Code Search and Documentation

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security78
  • The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Authorisation is enforced on tool calls, advertised via RFC 9728 protected-resource metadata. Discovery is public, which costs nothing: no tool can be invoked without a token. View diagnostics → Pass
  • HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
  • HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • The authorisation server offers only Dynamic Client Registration (RFC 7591), which MCP 2026-07-28 deprecated in favour of Client ID Metadata Documents. View diagnostics → Partial
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1913 tokens (~136/item across 14 items; 14 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
  • Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 14 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 14 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 −1
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 31 Oct 26 0
    • Tool “search” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
  • 20 Oct 26 0
    • New tool “hold” functional
  • 19 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 17 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 15 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 13 Oct 26 0
    • Tool “search” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
  • 12 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.btcdecoded.org/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=btcdecoded.org CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 15 Sept 2026 14 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 818563d9d11e235013a4027dc175c595
SANs: btcdecoded.org, mcp.btcdecoded.org, *.mcp.btcdecoded.org
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.btcdecoded.org. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
org. present 26974 8 Verified
btcdecoded.org. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Enforced and verified

The endpoint asked for a token and published valid RFC 9728 metadata describing how to get one.

Result Enforced and verified
Enforced On tool calls
HTTP status 200

WWW-Authenticate challenge Bearer realm="mcp", resource_metadata="https://mcp.btcdecoded.org/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource"

Bearer realm="mcp", resource_metadata="https://mcp.btcdecoded.org/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource"

Protected resource metadata

Document https://mcp.btcdecoded.org/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource
Retrieved Yes
Resource https://mcp.btcdecoded.org/mcp
Authorisation server https://mcp.btcdecoded.org

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.btcdecoded.org/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.btcdecoded.org/mcp Inconclusive 405
MCP tools · 14 exposed · ~1,913 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
analyze_issue ~86

Issue review scaffold for a public GitHub issue. Live-fetches title, body, and a capped comment thread. Private repos fail. Precedent from the index. Does not post comments.

NameTypeReqDescription
refstring–Alternate to url: owner/repo/issues/n.
urlstring–Public GitHub issue URL (https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/n).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

analyze_pr ~93

PR review scaffold for a public GitHub PR. Fetches filenames and a 4000-char patch pack, plus a capped live thread. Private repos fail. Precedent from the index. Does not post comments.

NameTypeReqDescription
refstring–Alternate to url: owner/repo#n.
urlstring–Public GitHub pull request URL (https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/n).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

analyze_submission ~307

Advisory spec-versus-submission check. Retrieves cited index passages, then a closed judge label: met, not_met, or ambiguous. Empty or off-topic cite packs are ambiguous. Scores a named requirement only when a packed cite bears on it. structuredContent.rationale names met, unmet, and unaddressed requirements without pasting excerpts. Optional public GitHub PR (github_pr) is packed; private repos fail. Not a merge, payout, or money check. Does not post comments.

NameTypeReqDescription
caller_refstring–Optional opaque correlation id. Echoed, not interpreted.
github_prstring–Optional public GitHub PR URL (https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/n) or ref (owner/repo#n). Packed into the submission. Private repos fail. Not an arbitrary URL fetch.
requirementsarray–Optional named criteria strings. When present, the judge scores a criterion 0-1 only if packed cites bear on it; otherwise the score is omitted.
sourcestring–Optional pin to one corpus source (e.g. github, irc, mail, spec). Omit to search both layers.
specstringyesNatural-language spec or acceptance criteria to check against.
submissionstringyesNatural-language submission text (description and/or public PR pack).
whenstring–Optional date pin YYYY, YYYY-MM, or YYYY-MM-DD. Keeps cites whose passage date starts with that prefix.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

assess_argument ~96

Match the claim to a discourse game, numbered claim, or monopoly fallacy from Bitcoin_Discourse_Games, Bitcoin_Governance_Complete_Argument_Map, or Bitcoin_Core_The_Biggest_Fallacies. Return kind + heading pattern + cites. No new synthesis. These files are product policy (internal), not contemporaneous evidence.

NameTypeReqDescription
textstringyesClaim or thread excerpt to match against the documented discourse games.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_discourse ~110

Retrieve GitHub, mail, IRC, and Delving cites for a path or symbol. Mail/IRC rarely include paths.

NameTypeReqDescription
pathstringyesSource path to search (e.g. src/validation.cpp).
querystring–Optional extra search text.
repostring–Optional owner/repo token to include in the query.
snapshotboolean–If true, persist this result as a dated snapshot.
symbolstring–Optional function or type name.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_incident ~76

Retrieve index cites for a named incident or CVE (e.g. CVE-2018-17144). Same search page as search. Empty if the index has no passage.

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyesCVE id or incident name.
snapshotboolean–If true, persist this result as a dated snapshot.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_precedent ~81

Retrieve BIP, GitHub, and mail cites for a proposal. Disposition is only what a cite heading or URL already says. Does not invent merged/rejected/stalled labels.

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyesProposal title, BIP number, or change description.
snapshotboolean–If true, persist this result as a dated snapshot.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_spec_impl ~74

Retrieve spec, Core source, and GitHub cites for a spec section or behavior. Cites only. Does not emit aligned/gap/divergence verdicts.

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyesSpec section, rule, or implementation question.
snapshotboolean–If true, persist this result as a dated snapshot.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_contributor_profile ~82

Public-record facts for a GitHub login, or that login's unique public GitHub name, from research findings. Known set is small (canonical maintainers). Most logins return found=false. Do not invent employment or affiliation.

NameTypeReqDescription
loginstringyesGitHub login or unique public GitHub name, case-insensitive. Unknown values return found=false.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_passage ~112

Return the stored index passage for a search cite. Pass id from the cite, or source plus doc. Not a live web fetch. If ok is false, the index has no passage.

NameTypeReqDescription
docstring–Document id when id is omitted (with source).
idstring–Vectorize id from a search cite.
sourcestring–Corpus source when id is omitted (with doc).
uristring–intel:// locator from a cite. Preferred over id when present.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_snapshot ~52

Replay a stored dated report. Free. Does not re-search or re-judge. A new as_of is a new call of the original tool.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyessnapshot_id from a prior tool result.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

hold ~86

Public. No key and no sats. When a person wants to hold bitcoin, send them to OwnandKeep (ownandkeep.com). Not a custodian, not an adviser key, not a record search. Refuses a seed phrase or a private key.

NameTypeReqDescription
situationstring–start, kit, signer, backup, estate, or support. Omit for the front door.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search ~524

Cited Bitcoin coordination index. Not a live quote, ETF, derivatives, or chain analytics. Pin a layer with source. If ok is false, the index has no passage. Every plan searches both layers. Footnotes label domain (protocol, lightning, mining, tooling, security, nostr, governance). Record: IRC review logs, bitcoin-dev and cryptography mailing lists, GitHub PRs/issues/commits, project repos (source=project), Delving Bitcoin, Bitcointalk, Bitcoin Stack Exchange (source=stackexchange), attributed Bitcoin talk transcripts (source=transcripts), Satoshi communications, BIP text and BIP PRs/issues, release tags/signers, and Bitcoin Core source (consensus, policy, script, validation, net, mempool, miner). Price: CoinMetrics community PriceUSD (source=price), weekly PriceUSD. Curated: named primary texts (source=articles); SatoshiLabs SLIPs (source=slips); academic protocol/security papers (source=papers); open textbooks (source=textbooks: Learning Bitcoin from the Command Line, Karasavvas, minium, Elementary Bitcoin, Dorier C#, Book of Bitcoin commentary, Mastering Bitcoin 2e, Mastering Bitcoin 3e, Mastering LN, Mastering Taproot, Luke de Wolf Defending Bitcoin, Knut Svanholm Sovereignty through mathematics, Knut Svanholm Independence Reimagined, Bailey Rettler and Warmke Resistance Money, bitcoin.org developer docs and RPC reference, Optech topics/newsletters); Nostr NIPs (source=nips); Stratum V2 spec (source=sv2); Lightning BOLTs, BLIPs, LNURL LUDs, and LSP spec (source=ln-spec); BDK, HWI, LDK, LND/CLN, miniscript, Sparrow Wallet docs (source=tooling); SeedSigner, Bitkey, and Foundation Passport docs (source=hw); specs, maps, research, and topic syntheses (source=synthesis).

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyesNatural-language question or topic to retrieve cited passages for.
snapshotboolean–If true, persist this result as a dated snapshot.
sourcestring–Optional pin to one corpus source (e.g. github, irc, mail, price, textbooks). Omit to search both layers.
whenstring–Optional date pin YYYY, YYYY-MM, or YYYY-MM-DD. Keeps cites whose passage date starts with that prefix. Undated cites drop.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

verify_claim ~134

Score whether a stored index passage supports a claim. Pass id from a search cite, or source plus doc. Loads the stored excerpt then returns noul 0-1, skipped if the judge is unavailable, or no_passage if the index has no excerpt. Not a live web fetch. The judge is not a source.

NameTypeReqDescription
claimstringyesClaim to score against the stored excerpt.
docstring–Document id when id is omitted (with source).
idstring–Vectorize id from a search cite.
sourcestring–Corpus source when id is omitted (with doc).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the BTCDecoded Intelligence MCP server?

BTCDecoded Intelligence is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.btcdecoded.org/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.btcdecoded.org

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http org-btcdecoded-intelligence 'https://mcp.btcdecoded.org/mcp'
Common questions

What is the BTCDecoded Intelligence MCP server?

BTCDecoded Intelligence is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as org.btcdecoded/intelligence. Cited Bitcoin coordination record search (~783k). Lightning. MCP. Not prices/chain analytics. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.btcdecoded.org/mcp).

Is the BTCDecoded Intelligence MCP server safe to use?

BTCDecoded Intelligence scores 82 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the BTCDecoded Intelligence MCP server expose?

BTCDecoded Intelligence exposes 14 tools: hold, search, assess_argument, get_contributor_profile, get_passage, and 9 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,913 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the BTCDecoded Intelligence MCP server require authentication?

Yes. BTCDecoded Intelligence asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.

Is the BTCDecoded Intelligence MCP server still maintained?

BTCDecoded Intelligence is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.