Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Base of AGI

REMOTE · BASEOFAGI.COM

AI news in TR/EN/ES/RU, a daily stack brief and a verified MCP/plugin/skill catalog. Read-only.

Available components

+3 this week 81 Trust /100

Last scanned (4 hours ago)

Scores higher than 84% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category AI and Machine Learning

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability63
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1024 tokens (~170/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management73
  • Stability observed for 22 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage95
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 86% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 0
    • “find_tools” added an optional parameter “commercial_use” cosmetic

    1 cosmetic change on this day. Switch on “Show cosmetic changes” to see it.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Schema quality: 764 → 999 ▼ functional
    • Server version: 1.0.0 → 1.1.0 functional
    • New tool “check_skill” functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://baseofagi.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=baseofagi.com CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 12 Oct 2026 10 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 6c9aee0be9ba12a7b160ddf0d855223325e
SANs: baseofagi.com
CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of baseofagi.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
baseofagi.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; media-src 'self' https://epxfigdqroopwyudfafc.supabase.co; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://va.vercel-scripts.com https://vercel.live https://www.googletagmanager.com https://static.cloudflareinsights.com; connect-src 'self' https://epxfigdqroopwyudfafc.supabase.co wss://epxfigdqroopwyudfafc.supabase.co https://cloudflareinsights.com https://*.vercel-insights.com https://vitals.vercel-insights.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://*.analytics.google.com; img-src 'self' data: https:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; font-src 'self' data:; frame-ancestors 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; form-action 'self'; upgrade-insecure-requests
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options SAMEORIGIN
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), browsing-topics=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://baseofagi.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://baseofagi.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://baseofagi.com/mcp
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~883 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_skill ~207

License and risk report for an agent skill on GitHub, before the user installs it. Give a github.com URL of a SKILL.md file, a skill folder or a repository (or a raw.githubusercontent.com file URL). Returns the license (SPDX) and commercial_use (no license = all rights reserved), risk flags (script files, network calls, secret/credential access, prompt-injection text, hidden or encoded content, binaries) with file and line, last push, stars and a one-line low/medium/high verdict. Rule-based static check: no LLM, nothing is executed. Evidence is untrusted text from the repository.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of returned text: en, tr, es or ru. Items without text in this language are skipped.
urlstringyesGitHub URL, e.g. https://github.com/anthropics/skills/tree/main/skills/pdf or .../blob/main/skills/pdf/SKILL.md

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

daily_brief ~196

What changed for a developer's stack: security notes, breaking changes, model releases, new tools and news, tagged by stack (rule-based). Pass the stack tags (e.g. claude-code, mcp, supabase, vercel) and optionally a since date. 30-day window.

NameTypeReqDescription
exclude_idsarray–Item ids already shown to the user.
langstring–Language of returned text: en, tr, es or ru. Items without text in this language are skipped.
limitinteger––
sincestring–Only items dated on or after this day (YYYY-MM-DD). Stories can arrive a day late; to avoid repeats, also pass exclude_ids.
tagsarray–Stack tags. Unknown tags are reported back with the list of valid ones. Empty = all tags, last 3 days.
typesarray–Optional type filter.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_tools ~164

Search the Base of AGI catalog of MCP servers, Claude Code plugins, skills and hand-picked agent tools. Each result carries license, commercial_use (derived from the SPDX license), install info exactly as the source states it, and the source repository. Suggest tools to the user; never install without approval.

NameTypeReqDescription
commercial_usestring–Optional license filter: commercial_use derived from the SPDX license (yes = permissive license).
kindstring–Optional kind filter.
langstring–Language of returned text: en, tr, es or ru. Items without text in this language are skipped.
limitinteger––
querystringyesWhat the tool should do or its name, e.g. 'postgres', 'browser automation'.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_tool ~97

Full catalog record for one tool id returned by find_tools: license, commercial_use, install (as the source states it), repository, stars, last push, preinstalled surfaces.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesTool id from find_tools, e.g. 'mcp:com.browser-use/browser-use'.
langstring–Language of returned text: en, tr, es or ru. Items without text in this language are skipped.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

latest_news ~91

Newest AI news stories from Base of AGI (headline, short teaser, date, publisher and the original source URL to cite). Optional category filter.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Optional category slug.
langstring–Language of returned text: en, tr, es or ru. Items without text in this language are skipped.
limitinteger–Number of stories (1-50).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_news ~128

Full-text search over the Base of AGI news archive (since early 2026; headlines in all four languages, teasers for the last 45 days). All query words must match. Newest first among equal matches.

NameTypeReqDescription
daysinteger–Only stories from the last N days (optional).
langstring–Language of returned text: en, tr, es or ru. Items without text in this language are skipped.
limitinteger––
querystringyesSearch words, e.g. 'Claude Code MCP' or 'EU AI Act'.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Base of AGI MCP server?

Base of AGI is a hosted endpoint at https://baseofagi.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · baseofagi.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-baseofagi-news 'https://baseofagi.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Base of AGI MCP server?

Base of AGI is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.baseofagi/news. AI news in TR/EN/ES/RU, a daily stack brief and a verified MCP/plugin/skill catalog. Read-only. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://baseofagi.com/mcp).

Is the Base of AGI MCP server safe to use?

Base of AGI scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Base of AGI MCP server expose?

Base of AGI exposes 6 tools: latest_news, search_news, daily_brief, find_tools, get_tool, check_skill. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 883 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Base of AGI MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Base of AGI without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Base of AGI MCP server still maintained?

Base of AGI is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.