Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Agile Today

REMOTE · AGILE-TODAY.ORG

Project management methodology graph: route planning, stage-gate decisions and plan checks.

Available components

+2 this week 87 Trust /100

Last scanned (19 hours ago)

Scores higher than 94% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category Project Management

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability78
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1669 tokens (~208/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
  • Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage91
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 74% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 2 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://agile-today.org/api/mcp?src=mcp-registry

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=agile-today.org CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 17 Oct 2026 15 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 6507ddb359c249a68631ec995649c1a70be
SANs: agile-today.org
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of agile-today.org. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
org. present 26974 8 Verified
agile-today.org. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), browsing-topics=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://agile-today.org/api/mcp?src=mcp-registry Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://agile-today.org/api/mcp?src=mcp-registry HTTPS enforced 308 https://agile-today.org/api/mcp?src=mcp-registry
MCP tools · 8 exposed · ~1,575 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_gate ~585

Evaluates gate g.g0 … g.g10 against your evidence. Outcome precedence: Stop > Recycle > Hold > Conditional go > Go, with the rule that fired (outcome_reason). Critical evidence missing or stale → Hold; required non-critical missing, or a waiver without a reason or an approver who decides at this gate → Conditional go; a waiver with both → Go with the Waiver modifier (under regulation a waived critical artifact stays Conditional go until the deviation is recorded with the quality approval); optional gaps are notes. Modifiers: Work started without the gate, Overdue, Stale, Waiver. gate.deciders decide, gate.advisors take part. A disproved key product hypothesis is a Recycle, not a Stop: pass earlier_stage_invalid:true with invalid_stage:'st.discovery'. At G8 (go / no-go), work_started_beyond:true means production was changed before the decision: Hold (R3), not a Go with a modifier. Call without evidence to list what the gate needs. Returns a receipt hash of the inputs.

NameTypeReqDescription
business_case_validboolean–false → Stop
contextobject–Project context. Unknown keys and values are rejected in the answer envelope with did_you_mean. Defaults: software, hybrid, complicated, tm, single, medium size, ui, data.
days_in_stagenumber––
earlier_stage_invalidboolean–true → Recycle; the answer names the stage to return to
evidenceobject–Map artifact id → state or {state, reason, ref, by, date}. A waiver is {state:'waived', reason, by}: by is the role id of a decider of this gate (see gate.deciders, e.g. r.client_owner) or 'name, rol…
gatestringyesGate id, e.g. g.g5
grace_daysnumber–Overrides both limits. Default: 80% of planned_stage_days, else by approach (predictive/hybrid 10, agile/flow 5); required evidence then waits twice as long
invalid_artifactstring–With earlier_stage_invalid: the artifact that is no longer true, to find where to return
invalid_stagestring–With earlier_stage_invalid: the stage to return to, if known
langstring–Answer language, default en
planned_stage_daysnumber–Planned length of the stage in days. With it, missing critical evidence is overdue after 80% of it and missing required evidence after all of it
work_started_beyondboolean–True if work of later stages already started (adds the 'work started without the gate' modifier; at G8 it is a Hold)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

check_mix ~154

For a set of ids: antipatterns in the set and detected by rules, conflicts, redundant alternatives (e.g. seven estimation methods), items to avoid or not applicable here, risks, missing inputs and suggested additions. ok = no antipatterns, conflicts, avoid or not-applicable items; a detected pattern of severity warning (e.g. output over outcome on a client contract) does not change ok.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextobject–Project context. Unknown keys and values are rejected in the answer envelope with did_you_mean. Defaults: software, hybrid, complicated, tm, single, medium size, ui, data.
idsarrayyes–
langstring–Answer language, default en

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

explain_node ~88

One node with its description, conditions, source, level and its links grouped by type, each with a link id (Lxxxx) to cite. Filter with link_types, direction and limit.

NameTypeReqDescription
directionstring––
idstringyes–
langstring–Answer language, default en
limitinteger––
link_typesarray––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_context ~58

Call first. Returns the context dimensions and flags (with defaults and how many rules each flag drives), stages, gates, evidence states and levels, the gate outcome precedence and the suggested workflow.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Answer language, default en

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

plan_project ~233

Route from presale to closure for a project context. Default is compact (ids by strength + a names dictionary, core items and gate evidence for all stages, about 6–10k characters). Ask for one stage with stages:['st.design'] and format:'full' for reasons, avoid texts and gate details. 'core' = do it here (context rule, flag or gate-critical artifact), at most 8 work items per stage (producers of the gate's critical artifacts first, then context rules, then flags).

NameTypeReqDescription
contextobject–Project context. Unknown keys and values are rejected in the answer envelope with did_you_mean. Defaults: software, hybrid, complicated, tm, single, medium size, ui, data.
formatstring–Default compact
includearray–Default all four
langstring–Answer language, default en
min_strengthstring–Default: core for all stages, all when stages are given
stagesarray–Stage ids or codes, e.g. ['st.analysis','design']. Default: all

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_graph ~69

Search names, ids, descriptions and aliases in English and Russian (word stems, small typos tolerated). Returns total and the best matches.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Answer language, default en
limitinteger––
querystringyes–
typestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

validate_plan ~246

Checks an ordered list of steps (stages, gates, events, practices, techniques, notations, artifacts). Errors: empty plan, unknown ids, non-step types, stage order (analysis and design work planned early is only a warning 'early'; building before G3–G5 is an order error), contract after delivery gates, a gate after the step it authorises (G8 after the cutover), antipatterns, avoid or not-applicable items. Warnings: duplicates, redundant alternatives, early work, a cutover with no G8 or go / no-go meeting before it, antipatterns of severity warning. 'Shadow start' looks at the order: G4 or G5 must come before the first build step. 'expected' lists gate evidence not yet produced by earlier steps.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextobject–Project context. Unknown keys and values are rejected in the answer envelope with did_you_mean. Defaults: software, hybrid, complicated, tm, single, medium size, ui, data.
evidenceobject–Artifacts that already exist
langstring–Answer language, default en
stepsarrayyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

when_to_use ~142

For one event, practice, technique, notation, tool, artifact or antipattern: does it fit this context (fits / avoid / not_applicable / antipattern), its strength and why, alternatives and their group advice, risks, and which gates require it.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextobject–Project context. Unknown keys and values are rejected in the answer envelope with did_you_mean. Defaults: software, hybrid, complicated, tm, single, medium size, ui, data.
idstringyese.g. t.planning_poker, p.stage_gating, x.velocity_kpi
langstring–Answer language, default en

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Agile Today MCP server?

Agile Today is a hosted endpoint at https://agile-today.org/api/mcp?src=mcp-registry, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · agile-today.org

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http org-agile-today-agile-today 'https://agile-today.org/api/mcp?src=mcp-registry'
Common questions

What is the Agile Today MCP server?

Agile Today is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as org.agile-today/agile-today. Project management methodology graph: route planning, stage-gate decisions and plan checks. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://agile-today.org/api/mcp?src=mcp-registry).

Is the Agile Today MCP server safe to use?

Agile Today scores 87 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Agile Today MCP server expose?

Agile Today exposes 8 tools: list_context, plan_project, check_gate, when_to_use, check_mix, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,575 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Agile Today MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Agile Today without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Agile Today MCP server still maintained?

Agile Today is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.