Upravio public knowledge
REMOTE · APP.UPRAVIO.COM
Public Upravio contract-management guides and capabilities. No private workspace access.
Available components
Last scanned (22 hours ago)
Scores higher than 94% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 16 Oct 2026.
Category Project Management
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability84
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 671 tokens (~47/item across 14 items; 3 tools + 11 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 15 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 13 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Oct 26 +3
- Schema quality: 577 → 671 ▼ functional
- New resource “izvjestavanje” functional
- New resource “kontrolna-lista” functional
- 3 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Sept 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 26 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 16 Oct 2026 · Probed https://app.upravio.com/api/public/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=app.upravio.com | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 23 Aug 2026 | 21 Nov 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 66e3bac008f6626c750bf169b0539057326 |
| SANs: app.upravio.com | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of app.upravio.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| upravio.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; img-src 'self' data:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; connect-src 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; object-src 'none' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://app.upravio.com/api/public/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://app.upravio.com/api/public/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://app.upravio.com/api/public/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_knowledge Dohvati temu ~45
Dohvati javnu temu prema ID-u iz kataloga ili rezultata pretrage. Ne dohvaća proizvoljne URL-ove.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_capabilities Popis javnih tema ~31
Popis funkcionalnosti i uvjeta pilota; ne prikazuje podatke korisničkih organizacija.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_knowledge Pretraži javno znanje o Upraviju ~61
Pretraga funkcionalnosti, ograničenja i pilota na hrvatskom ili po engleskim ključnim riječima. Vraća izvore; nije generativni odgovor.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Upravio public knowledge MCP server?
Upravio public knowledge is a hosted endpoint at https://app.upravio.com/api/public/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · app.upravio.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-upravio-public-knowledge 'https://app.upravio.com/api/public/mcp'
What is the Upravio public knowledge MCP server?
Upravio public knowledge is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.upravio/public-knowledge. Public Upravio contract-management guides and capabilities. No private workspace access. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://app.upravio.com/api/public/mcp).
Is the Upravio public knowledge MCP server safe to use?
Upravio public knowledge scores 86 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Upravio public knowledge MCP server expose?
Upravio public knowledge exposes 3 tools: search_knowledge, get_knowledge, list_capabilities. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 137 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Upravio public knowledge MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Upravio public knowledge without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Upravio public knowledge MCP server still maintained?
Upravio public knowledge is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 16 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.