Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

SeaReady

REMOTE · SEAREADY.NET

Ship inspection readiness: SIRE 2.0 prep questions, PSC checklists, upcoming vetting changes.

Available components

+8 this week 68 Trust /100

Last scanned (15 hours ago)

Scores higher than 58% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 18 Oct 2026.

Category Security

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security57
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability81
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 402 tokens (~134/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management33
  • Stability observed for 10 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 16 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 14 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 13 Oct 26 +5
    • HTTPS: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 12 Oct 26 +1
    • Tool “psc_checklist” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
  • 9 Oct 26 60

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 18 Oct 2026 · Probed https://seaready.net/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=seaready.net CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 5 Oct 2026 4 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 a07987273ca22050e60ae7a73578d89
SANs: seaready.net, *.seaready.net
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of seaready.net. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
net. present 37331 13 Verified
seaready.net. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
x-content-type-options nosniff

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://seaready.net/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://seaready.net/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://seaready.net/mcp
MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~331 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
inspection_deadlines ~62

Known upcoming dates in vetting and PSC regimes (e.g. concentrated inspection campaigns, RightShip rule changes) with days remaining, plus when SeaReady last verified each module.

NameTypeReqDescription
within_daysinteger–Only changes within this many days (default 365).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

psc_checklist ~143

Port State Control preparation items for one deficiency area (an area id such as "cert", "crew", "fire", "lsa", "nav", "mach", "pol1", "ism", "isps" — or words from the area title such as "certificates" or "fire safety"). Call without "area" to list the 24 areas. Items flagged detainableHint are commonly a ground for detention; items marked demonstrate are tests the PSC officer asks the crew to run; items with a pack apply only to the ship types listed.

NameTypeReqDescription
areastring–Area id or words from its title. Omit to list areas.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

sire_question_lookup ~126

Search SeaReady's original-wording SIRE 2.0 preparation question bank (12 chapters). Returns what good looks like, the evidence an inspector expects and common negative grounds. Not OCIMF text — for preparation only.

NameTypeReqDescription
chapterinteger–Optional SIRE 2.0 chapter number to limit the search.
limitinteger–Maximum results (default 5).
querystringyesWords to search for, e.g. "mooring", "enclosed space", "passage plan". Or a question id like "9.2".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the SeaReady MCP server?

SeaReady is a hosted endpoint at https://seaready.net/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · seaready.net

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http net-seaready-seaready 'https://seaready.net/mcp'
Common questions

What is the SeaReady MCP server?

SeaReady is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as net.seaready/seaready. Ship inspection readiness: SIRE 2.0 prep questions, PSC checklists, upcoming vetting changes. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://seaready.net/mcp).

Is the SeaReady MCP server safe to use?

SeaReady scores 68 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the SeaReady MCP server expose?

SeaReady exposes 3 tools: sire_question_lookup, psc_checklist, inspection_deadlines. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 331 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the SeaReady MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to SeaReady without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the SeaReady MCP server still maintained?

SeaReady is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 18 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.