Pyxmark
REMOTE · MCP.PYXMARK.COM
Vendor checks: sanctions lists, SEC filings, domain age and a due-diligence report with sources.
Available components
Last scanned (18 hours ago)
Scores higher than 57% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 18 Oct 2026.
Category Security
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security69
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability61
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1532 tokens (~255/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 18 Oct 26 67
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 18 Oct 2026 · Probed https://mcp.pyxmark.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=pyxmark.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 12 Oct 2026 | 10 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 8433730eac7948c10e563cde4fcf78e5 |
| SANs: pyxmark.com, mcp.pyxmark.com, *.mcp.pyxmark.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of mcp.pyxmark.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| pyxmark.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'none' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.pyxmark.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.pyxmark.com/mcp | Inconclusive | 405 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
company_profile SEC company profile ~123
Full SEC EDGAR record for one company, given its CIK, ticker or name (best match): legal name, industry (SIC), state of incorporation, business address, 3 fiscal years of revenue, net income, total assets and cash, and its recent 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K filings with links. Use search_company first if you only have a partial or ambiguous name.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cik | string | – | SEC CIK number |
| name | string | – | Company name (fuzzy) |
| ticker | string | – | Stock ticker |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
domain_age Domain age and email records ~51
Domain registration date, age, registrar (RDAP) and email-auth records (MX, SPF, DMARC), which are common fraud signals.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | string | yes | Domain, URL, or email address |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
due_diligence_report Vendor due diligence report ~539
One-call due-diligence report: SEC profile (if public), sanctions screen, federal exclusions, domain signals, and state registry link, with a red-flag summary, a verdict (clear / review / hold; rules at https://mcp.pyxmark.com/#verdict) and source links. An agent should not pay or onboard on 'hold', and should ask a person on 'review'. Informational only, not a compliance determination. Results come from public government lists and filings, may be incomplete or out of date, and fuzzy name matches can be false positives or miss variants. Verify every potential match against the official source before acting.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| address | string | – | Optional: street address or city (free text). Flags addresses in comprehensively sanctioned regions: Crimea, the so-called DNR/LNR, Iran, North Korea, Cuba (Syria is flagged for review) |
| birth_year | number | – | Optional: birth year, if the full date isn't known |
| cik | string | – | SEC CIK |
| country | string | – | Optional: country where the person lives or the organisation is based |
| dob | string | – | Optional: date of birth (YYYY-MM-DD) of the person, to tell them apart from others with the same name |
| domain | string | – | Company website or email domain |
| string | – | Optional: contact email, matched against emails and domains the lists give | |
| ids | array | – | Optional: identifiers to match against the lists: company registration or tax numbers, passport or national ID numbers, vessel IMO numbers, SWIFT/BIC codes, crypto addresses |
| name | string | – | Company or person name |
| nationality | string | – | Optional: the person's nationality (country name or ISO code) |
| owners | array | – | Optional: owners and their share (percent). Each is screened; listed owners holding 50% or more in total make the company blocked under the OFAC 50 percent rule |
| phone | string | – | Optional: phone number, matched on its last 9 digits against phones the lists give |
| state | string | – | US state of incorporation/registration |
| subject_type | string | – | Optional: whether the name is a company or a person. Defaults to company when the name has a legal suffix such as Inc or LLC (or, in a report, when it is an SEC-registered company); then person, vess… |
| ticker | string | – | Ticker |
| website | string | – | Optional: website or domain, matched against websites the lists give |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
screen_sanctions Screen sanctions lists ~562
Fuzzy-screen a person or organisation name against OFAC SDN + Consolidated, UN, EU, and UK sanctions lists. Returns up to 15 scored matches with source links; if more match, the summary says so and suggests a more specific query. Optional dob/birth_year, nationality and country set aside same-name matches whose listed details differ (rules at https://mcp.pyxmark.com/#details). Optional address, email, phone, website, ids and owners are matched against the details the lists give (identifier matches, sanctioned regions, the 50 percent rule); the assessment field sums it up as hold / review / clear. Informational only, not a compliance determination. Results come from public government lists and filings, may be incomplete or out of date, and fuzzy name matches can be false positives or miss variants. Verify every potential match against the official source before acting.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| address | string | – | Optional: street address or city (free text). Flags addresses in comprehensively sanctioned regions: Crimea, the so-called DNR/LNR, Iran, North Korea, Cuba (Syria is flagged for review) |
| birth_year | number | – | Optional: birth year, if the full date isn't known |
| country | string | – | Optional: country where the person lives or the organisation is based |
| dob | string | – | Optional: date of birth (YYYY-MM-DD) of the person, to tell them apart from others with the same name |
| string | – | Optional: contact email, matched against emails and domains the lists give | |
| ids | array | – | Optional: identifiers to match against the lists: company registration or tax numbers, passport or national ID numbers, vessel IMO numbers, SWIFT/BIC codes, crypto addresses |
| name | string | yes | Person or organisation name |
| nationality | string | – | Optional: the person's nationality (country name or ISO code) |
| owners | array | – | Optional: owners and their share (percent). Each is screened; listed owners holding 50% or more in total make the company blocked under the OFAC 50 percent rule |
| phone | string | – | Optional: phone number, matched on its last 9 digits against phones the lists give |
| subject_type | string | – | Optional: whether the name is a company or a person. Defaults to company when the name has a legal suffix such as Inc or LLC (or, in a report, when it is an SEC-registered company); then person, vess… |
| threshold | number | – | Minimum match score 0-1 (default 0.88) |
| website | string | – | Optional: website or domain, matched against websites the lists give |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_company Search SEC companies ~90
Look up which SEC-registered company a name, ticker or CIK refers to. Returns up to 10 candidates, each with its CIK, tickers and a match score, and nothing else. Use it to pick the right CIK when a name is ambiguous, then call company_profile with that CIK for the details.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | Company name, ticker, or CIK |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
state_registry_link State business registry link ~59
Official Secretary of State business-search link for a US state, to verify a private company's status, formation date, and registered agent.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company | string | – | Company name (optional) |
| state | string | yes | Two-letter code or state name |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Pyxmark MCP server?
Pyxmark is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.pyxmark.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.pyxmark.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-pyxmark-pyxmark 'https://mcp.pyxmark.com/mcp'
What is the Pyxmark MCP server?
Pyxmark is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.pyxmark/pyxmark. Vendor checks: sanctions lists, SEC filings, domain age and a due-diligence report with sources. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.pyxmark.com/mcp).
Is the Pyxmark MCP server safe to use?
Pyxmark scores 67 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Pyxmark MCP server expose?
Pyxmark exposes 6 tools: search_company, company_profile, screen_sanctions, domain_age, state_registry_link, due_diligence_report. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,424 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Pyxmark MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Pyxmark without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Pyxmark MCP server still maintained?
Pyxmark is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 18 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.