Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Glyt

REMOTE · GLYT.NET

Human-in-the-loop approval for agent actions, with verifiable action-bound receipts.

Available components

0 this week 79 Trust /100

Last scanned (5 hours ago)

Scores higher than 79% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Security

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 662 tokens (~110/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage78
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 33% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 24 Oct 26 +61
    • HTTPS: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Stability: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • HSTS header: fail → pass ▲ security
    • Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
    • Authorization: Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 6 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. security
    • Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → reachable ▲ functional
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
  • 22 Oct 26 −61
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
    • Stability: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • HTTPS: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
    • HSTS header: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Authorization: Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to connect, but we couldn't read the whole tool list to see what that exposes. security
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 26 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Aug 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 11 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 31 Jul 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://glyt.net/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=glyt.net CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 21 Oct 2026 19 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 65ddd1e7393856c1e1a917a81a50808151e
SANs: *.glyt.net, glyt.net
CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of glyt.net. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
net. present 37331 13 Verified
glyt.net. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://glyt.net/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://glyt.net/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://glyt.net/mcp
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~562 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_approval ~51

Poll one of your approval requests. Requires the same `id_token`. Returns the request view, including the signed receipt once decided.

NameTypeReqDescription
id_tokenstringyes–
request_idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

discovery ~27

Glyt service discovery: issuer did:key, receipt schema version, and how to verify receipts offline.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

file_contest ~257

As the SUBJECT of an approval, file a Bitcoin-anchored, self-signed objection into that receipt's declared contest channel (the §12.3 upper bound). You sign the contest with your OWN ed25519 key and supply your OWN Touchstone-audience id_token — Glyt writes it AS you, holding no secret. Sign JCS{v:1,recorder_id:<standing.anchor.contest.recorder>,event_type:"touchstone.contest",actor_sub:<your sub>,counterparty_sub:null,payload_hash:<target_digest>,client_ts:null}; target_digest is standing.anchor.attestation entry's payload_hash (from the inclusion endpoint). contestant_pubkey/contestant_sig are standard base64.

NameTypeReqDescription
contestant_pubkeystringyesYour ed25519 public key, standard base64.
contestant_sigstringyesYour signature over the contest signed_content, standard base64.
id_tokenstringyesYour Glyt-audience Colony id_token (authenticates you as the subject).
reasonstringyes–
receipt_idstringyes–
touchstone_id_tokenstringyesYour Touchstone-audience Colony id_token (authenticates the contest write as you).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_receipt ~25

Fetch a signed receipt envelope by id.

NameTypeReqDescription
receipt_idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

request_approval ~111

Ask the operator behind this agent to approve a specific action. Requires a Colony token-exchange id_token (colony:operator) as `id_token`. Returns the request view; poll with check_approval. Nothing is approved without the human's decision.

NameTypeReqDescription
actionobjectyes–
callback_urlstring––
id_tokenstringyesA Colony token-exchange id_token audienced to Glyt.
stake_tierstring––
summarystring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

verify_receipt ~91

Verify a Glyt receipt against the exact action you are about to run. Returns {valid, decision, acr, not_after, reasons}. The authoritative check is offline against the issuer did:key; this is a convenience.

NameTypeReqDescription
actionobjectyes–
expected_agent_substring––
receipt–yesThe receipt envelope object or its JSON string.
required_acrstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Glyt MCP server?

Glyt is a hosted endpoint at https://glyt.net/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · glyt.net

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http net-glyt-glyt 'https://glyt.net/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Glyt MCP server?

Glyt is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as net.glyt/glyt. Human-in-the-loop approval for agent actions, with verifiable action-bound receipts. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://glyt.net/mcp).

Is the Glyt MCP server safe to use?

Glyt scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Glyt MCP server expose?

Glyt exposes 6 tools: discovery, verify_receipt, get_receipt, request_approval, check_approval, file_contest. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 562 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Glyt MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Glyt without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Glyt MCP server still maintained?

Glyt is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.