io.github.naeem-jtr/jtr-holidays
REMOTE · API.JTRHOLIDAYS.COM
Search tours, attraction tickets, and holiday packages across 24 countries.
Available components
Last scanned (3 hours ago)
Scores higher than 66% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category E-commerce
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security83
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability86
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 620 tokens (~62/item across 10 items; 8 tools + 2 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management20
- Stability observed for 6 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
- Schema quality: 541 → 620 ▼ functional
- Schema quality: good → excellent functional
- New tool “get_nearby_activities” functional
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 30 Oct 26 +37
- Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- First check of Judged manipulation: pass security
- MCP protocol: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → reachable ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- Schema quality: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- First check of Destructive annotations: pass functional
- Schema quality: excellent → good functional
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://api.jtrholidays.com/mcp/v1
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=jtrholidays.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 22 Oct 2026 | 20 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | c5091aec1b1ac3320ea7cdf38b1427a4 |
| SANs: jtrholidays.com, *.jtrholidays.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of api.jtrholidays.com. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| jtrholidays.com. | present | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| api.jtrholidays.com. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=0; includeSubDomains; preload |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://api.jtrholidays.com/mcp/v1 | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://api.jtrholidays.com/mcp/v1 | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://api.jtrholidays.com/mcp/v1 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_availability ~75
Check if an activity is available on a specific date and get pricing options
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| activity_id | string | yes | Activity UUID |
| date | string | yes | Date to check in Y-m-d format (e.g. "2025-12-25") |
| pax | integer | – | Number of people (default: 1) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
compare_activities ~78
Compare 2–5 JTR activities side-by-side on price, discount, rating, inclusions, and cancellation policy. Use this when a user asks "which is better?" or wants to choose between specific activities.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| activity_ids | array | yes | Array of 2–5 activity UUIDs to compare (from search_activities results) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_activity_details ~43
Get full details for a single activity including inclusions, exclusions, cancellation policy, and reviews
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| activity_id | string | yes | Activity UUID from search_activities results |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_current_offers ~81
Return activities with active discounts — where the current price is lower than the original price. Sorted by discount percentage. Use this when a user asks for deals, discounts, or best value.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| destination | string | – | Filter offers to a specific city or country |
| limit | integer | – | Max results (default: 20, max: 50) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_destinations ~29
List all destinations (countries) where JTR Holidays offers tours, with activity counts and popular picks
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_holiday_packages ~71
Browse multi-day holiday packages with itineraries, departures, and pricing
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| destination | string | – | Filter by country or region |
| duration_days | integer | – | Filter by exact number of days |
| limit | integer | – | Max results to return (default: 20, max: 50) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_nearby_activities ~79
List up to 6 other kinds of activity in the same city as one activity, nearest first. Similar activities (same category) are left out. Each has distance_km (null when unknown). Use this when a user asks what else to do nearby.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| activity_id | string | yes | Activity UUID from search_activities results |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_activities ~105
Search JTR Holidays activity/tour catalog by destination, category, and budget
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| budget_max | number | – | Maximum price per person in the activity's local currency |
| category | string | – | Activity category (e.g. "Desert Safari", "Sightseeing") |
| destination | string | – | City or country name (e.g. "Dubai", "Singapore") |
| limit | integer | – | Max results to return (default: 20, max: 50) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the io.github.naeem-jtr/jtr-holidays MCP server?
io.github.naeem-jtr/jtr-holidays is a hosted endpoint at https://api.jtrholidays.com/mcp/v1, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · api.jtrholidays.com
claude mcp add --transport http naeem-jtr-jtr-holidays 'https://api.jtrholidays.com/mcp/v1'
What is the io.github.naeem-jtr/jtr-holidays MCP server?
io.github.naeem-jtr/jtr-holidays is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.naeem-jtr/jtr-holidays. Search tours, attraction tickets, and holiday packages across 24 countries. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.jtrholidays.com/mcp/v1).
Is the io.github.naeem-jtr/jtr-holidays MCP server safe to use?
io.github.naeem-jtr/jtr-holidays scores 76 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.naeem-jtr/jtr-holidays MCP server expose?
io.github.naeem-jtr/jtr-holidays exposes 8 tools: search_activities, get_activity_details, check_availability, get_destinations, get_holiday_packages, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 561 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the io.github.naeem-jtr/jtr-holidays MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to io.github.naeem-jtr/jtr-holidays without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the io.github.naeem-jtr/jtr-holidays MCP server still maintained?
io.github.naeem-jtr/jtr-holidays is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.